A Collaborative Design for a Finnish Teacher Education Development Programme

Abstract

This paper describes a collaborative design for the Finnish Teacher Education Development Programme in a decentralised education system where teachers, schools, municipalities and universities have high autonomy. The development programme was designed by 70 experts from the universities and stakeholders. The research outcomes related to teacher education were described, and brainstorming related to the renewal of teacher education was organised at the national level. Brainstorming was aiming to capture opinions of teacher educators and teachers. Moreover, several meetings were organised all over the country. The development programme set out three strategic competence goals for teachers’ pre- and in-service education and continuous life-long professional learning: a broad and solid knowledge base; competences for generating novel ideas and educational innovations; and competences for developing teachers’ own expertise as well as and their schools. Furthermore, the development programme included six concrete strategic guidelines, which helped determine the direction for the development of teacher education.

Keywords

• Teacher education,education policy,teacher standards

References

1. Akiba, M., & LeTendre, G. (2018). The Routledge International Handbook of Teacher Quality and Policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
2. APST. (2014). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Melbourne: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers/standards/list
3. Beach, D., Bagley, C. Eriksson, A., & Player-Koro, C. (2016). Changing teacher education in Sweden: Using Meta-ethnographic Analysis to Understand and Describe Policy Making and Educational Changes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 160–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.011
4. Beijaard, D., Korthagen, F., & Verloop, N. (2007). Understanding How Teachers Learn as a Prerequisite for Promoting Teacher Learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600601152298
5. Blömeke, S., Eklöf, H. Fredriksson, U. Halldórsson, A.M. Jensen, S. S. Kavli, A.-B. Kjærnsli, M. Kjeldsen, C. Nilsen, T. Nissinen, K. Ólafsson, R. F. Oskarsson, M. Rasmusson, M. Rautopuro, J. Reimer, D. Scherer, R. Sortkær, B. Sørensen, H. Wester, A., & Vettenranta. J. (2018). Northern Lights on TIMSS and PISA 2018. TemaNord 2018:524. Cobenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. https://karvi.fi/app/uploads/2018/09/Northern_Lights_on_TIMSS_and_PISA_2018.pdf
6. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. DOI 10.3316/QRJ0902027.
7. Burns,T., & Köster, F. Eds. (2016). Governing Education in a ComplexWorld. Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255364-en
8. Caena, F. (2014). Teacher Competence Frameworks in Europe: Policy-as-Discourse and Policy-as-Practice. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 311–31. DOI:10.1111/ejed.12088

9. Cochran-Smith, M. (2006). Policy, Practice, and Politics in Teacher Education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
10. Cochran-Smith, M., Keefe, E.S., & Carney, M.C. (2018) Teacher Educators as Reformers: Competing Agendas. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(5), 572–90. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2018.1523391
11. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999) Reshaping Teaching Policy, Preparation and Practice: influences on the National Board for Teaching Professional Standards. Washington, DC, AACTE Publications. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED432570.pdf
13. Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Research on Teaching and Teacher Education and Its Influences on Policy and Practice. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16639597
14. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher Education around the World: What Can We Learn from International Practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40 (3), 291–309. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
15. Department for Education. (2011), updated 2013. Teachers' Standards: Guidance for School Leaders, School Staff and Governing Bodies. London: DfE. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/665520/Teachers__Standards.pdf
16. Eklund, G. (2018). Master’s Thesis as Part of Research-Based Teacher Education: A Finnish Case. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 8(1), 5-20.
17. European Commission. (2013). Supporting Teacher Competence Development for Better Learning Outcomes. Brussels: EC. https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/education/experts-groups/2011-2013/teacher/teachercomp_en.pdf
18. Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, Professionality and the Development of Education Professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00392.x
19. Evetts, J. (2012). Similarities in Contexts and Theorizing: Professionalism and Inequity. Professions and Professionalism, 2(2), 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.7577/
20. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2008). Teacher learning: how do teachers learn to teach? In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D. Mcintyre (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. Enduring Questions in Changing Context (pp. 697–705). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis,
21. Finland Government Programme. (2015). Finland Government Programme. http://valtioneuvosto.fi/documents/10184/1427398/Ratkaisujen+Suomi_EN_YHDISTETTY_netti.pdf/8d2e1a66-e24a-4073-8303-ee3127fbfcac
22. Flores, M.A. (2019). Learning to Be a Teacher: Mentoring, Collaboration and Professional Practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(5), 535–38. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2019.1680207.
23. Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. 2012. Reconceptualizing the Knowledge Base of Language Teacher Education. Tesol Quarterly, 32(3), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588114|
24. Garm, N., & Karlsen, G. E. (2004). Teacher Education Reform in Europe: The Case of Norway; Trends and Tensions in a Global Perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education 20,(7): 731–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.07.004
25. Goe, L., Bell, C., & Little, O. (2008). Approaches to Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness: A Research Synthesis. Washington. DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
26. Guerriero, S., & Deligiannidi, K. (2017). The Teaching Profession and Its Knowledge Base. In S. Guerriero (Ed.). Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264270695-3-en.
27. Hargreaves, D. (1996). Teaching as a Research-based Profession: Possibilities and Prospects. London: The Teacher Training Agency.
28. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. (2002). A Knowledge Base for the Teaching Profession: What Would It Look Like and How Can We Get One? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031005003
29. Holappa, A-S. (2007). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelma 2000-luvulla – uudistus paikallisina prosesseina kahdessa kaupungissa [The Renewal of the Basic Education Curriculum: Case study in two cuties]. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis. series E 94. Oulun yliopisto. Kasvatustieteiden tiedekunta.
30. Husu J., & Toom A. (2016). Opettajat ja opettajankoulutus – suuntia tulevaan: Selvitys ajankohtaisesta opettaja- ja opettajankoulutustutkimuksesta opettajankoulutuksen kehittämisohjelman laatimisen tueksi. [Teachers and teacher education – New directions for future: A report on current teacher education research for the Teacher Education Development Programme]. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja No. 33.
31. Ingvarson, L. (2002). Development of a National Standards Framework for the Teaching Profession. An Issues paper prepared for the MCEETYA Taskforce on Teacher Quality and Educational Leadership. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research. http://research.acer.edu.au/teaching_standards
32. Kitchen, J., & Figg, C. (2011). Establishing and Sustaining Teacher Educator Professional Development in a Self-Study Community of Practice: Pre-tenure Teacher Educators Developing Professionally. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 880–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.02.003
33. Koenraad, T., & van der Hoeff, A. (2013). National Competence Standards for Initial Teacher Education: A Result of Collaboration by Faculties of Education in the Netherlands. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 2(2), 167-194.
34. Korthagen, F. A. J. (2016). The Pedagogy of Teacher Education. In J. Loughran & M. L. Hamilton (Eds.). International Handbook of Teacher Education, Volume 1 (pp. 311–46). Dordrecht: Springer.
35. Korthagen, F. A. J. (2017). A Foundation for Effective Teacher Education: Teacher Education Pedagogy Based on Situated Learning. In D. J. Clandinin & J. Husu (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. Volume 1. London: Sage.
36. Koster, B., & Dengerink, J. J. (2008). Professional standards for teacher educators: how to deal with complexity, ownership and function: Experiences from the Netherlands. European Journal of Teacher Education,31(2),135-149, DOI: 10.1080/02619760802000115
37. Lavonen, J. (2018). Educating professional teachers in Finland through the continuous improvement of teacher education programmes. In Y. Weinberger & Z. Libman (Eds.), Contemporary pedagogies in teacher education and development (pp. 3–22). London: IntechOpen.
38. Leana, C. R. (2011). The Missing Link in School Reform. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(4), 30–35. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_missing_link_in_school_reform
39. Madalińska-Michalak, J., O’Doherty, T., & Flores, M. A. (2018). Teachers and Teacher Education in Uncertain Times. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(5), 567–71. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2018.1532024
40. Maier, R., & Schmidt, A. (2015). Explaining Organizational Knowledge Creation with a Knowledge Maturing Model. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(4), 361–81. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.56.
41. Malm, B. (2009). Towards a New Professionalism: Enhancing Personal and Professional Development in Teacher Education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 35(1), 77–91. DOI: 10.1080/02607470802587160.
42. Maviş, F. Ö, Çaycı, D., & Arslan, M. (2014). Evaluation of Turkey’s Teacher Training System from the Viewpoint of Experienced Teachers (Past, Present and Future). Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 3(1), 91-108.
43. Ministry of Education and Culture (MEC). (2016). Opettajankoulutuksen kehittämisohjelma [Development programme for teachers’ pre- and in-service education]. https://minedu.fi/artikkeli/-/asset_publisher/opettajankoulutuksen-kehittamisohjelma-julkistettiin-opetnitelmallisesti-lapi-tyour
44. MEC (2018a). Asetus varhaiskasvatuksesta tarkentaa varhaiskasvatuslain säännöksiä [The Decree on Early Childhood Education Clarifies the Provisions of the Early Childhood Education Act]. Helsinki: Ministry of Education and Culuture. https://minedu.fi/artikkeli/-/asset_publisher/asetus-varhaiskasvatuksesta-tarkentaa-varhaiskasvatuslain-saannoksia
45. MEC (2018b). Peruskoulufoorumi luovutti esityksensä peruskoulun kehittämislinjauksiksi [The Basic School Forum Published the Developmental plan for the basic school]. Helsinki: Ministry of Education and Culuture. http://minedu.fi/artikkeli/-/asset_publisher/peruskoulufoorumi-luovutti-esityksensa-peruskoulun-kehittamislinjauksiksi
46. MEC (2018c). The Eleven Most Important Changes in the Reform of General Upper Secondary Education. Helsinki: Ministry of Education and Culuture. https://minedu.fi/documents/1410845/5394394/11+most+important+changes.pdf/df474839-9c46-4040-b339-0dbfa1bc0eae/11+most+important+changes.pdf.pdf
47. Müller, J., Norrie, C., Hernández, F., & Goodson, I. (2010). Restructuring Teachers’ Work-Lives and Knowledge in England and Spain. Compare, 40(3), 265–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057920902830061
48. Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2017). Forskrift om rammeplan for grunnskolelærerutdanningene for 1.–7. trinn og 5.–10. trinn. Oslo: Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/6a4066c77c3c45b08044487d8a571a8f/forskrift_rammeplan_grunnskolelaererutdanningene.pdf
49. OECD (2013). PISA 2012. Results in Focus. What 15-Year-Olds Know and What They Can Do with What They Know. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
50. OECD (2014). Talis 2013 Results: An International Perspective on Teaching and Learning. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/talis-2013-results_9789264196261-en
51. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52. Plecki, M., & Loeb, H. (2004) Lessons for Policy Design and Implementation: Examining State and Federal Efforts to Improve Teacher Quality. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education 103(1), 348 – 389. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7984.2004.tb00040.x
53. Printy, S. M. (2008). Leadership for Teacher Learning: A Community of Practice Perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 187–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X07312958
54. Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2014). Comprehensive School Teachers’ Professional Agency in Large-Scale Educational Change. Journal of Educational Change, 15(3), 303–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-013-9215-8
55. Révai, N. (2018). What Difference Do Standards Make to Educating Teachers?: A Review with Case Studies on Australia, Estonia and Singapore. OECD Education Working Paper No. 174. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/WKP(2018)10&docLanguage=En
56. Russell, T., McPherson, S., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Coherence and Collaboration in Teacher Education Reform. Canadian Journal of Education, 26(1), 37-55. DOI: 10.2307/1602144
57. Sachs, J. (2003) Teacher Professional Standards: Controlling or developing teaching? Teachers and Teaching, 9(2), 175-186, DOI: 10.1080/13540600309373
58. Slater, L. (2010) Collaboration: A Framework for School Improvement. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ984546.pdf
59. Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish Miracle of PISA: Historical and Sociological Remarks on Teaching and Teacher Education. Comparative Education 41, 455–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060500317810
60. Stronge, J. H., & Hindman, J. (2003). Hiring the Best Teachers. Educational Leadership 60, 48–52. //www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/may03/vol60/num08/Hiring-the-Best-Teachers.aspx
61. Surowiecki, J. (2005). The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Anchor Books.
62. Swedish Council for Higher Education. (2017). Qualifications Ordinance. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Higher Education. https://www.uhr.se/en/start/laws-and-regulations/Laws-and-regulations/The-Higher-Education-Ordinance/Annex-2/
63. Tellez, K. (2003). Three Themes on Standards in Teacher Education: Legislative Expediency, the Role of External Review, and Test Bias in the Assessment of Pedagogical Knowledge. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 9–18. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23478413
64. Torrance, D., & Forde, C. (2017). Redefining What It Means to Be a Teacher through Professional Standards: Implications for Continuing Teacher Education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 110–26. doi:10.1080/02619768.2016.1246527
65. Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. C. (2001). Teacher Knowledge and the Knowledge Base of Teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 441–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00003-4
66. Westbury, J. Hansén, S.-H., Kansanen, P., & Björkvist, O. (2005) Teacher Education for Research‐based Practice in Expanded Roles: Finland's experience. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(5), 475-485, DOI: 10.1080/00313830500267937
67. Williams, J. (2014). Teacher Educator Professional Learning in the Third Space: Implications for Identity and Practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 315–26. DOI: 10.1177/0022487114533128
68. Young, J.C., Hall, C., & Clarke, A. (2007). Challenges to University Autonomy in Initial Teacher Education Programmes: The Cases of England, Manitoba, and British Columbia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 81–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.008