A Collaborative Design for a Finnish Teacher Education Development Programme

Year 2020, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 241 - 262, 31.08.2020

Jari Lavonen , Seija Mahlamäki-kultanen Sanna Vahtıvuori-hännınen Armi Mikkola

Abstract

This paper describes a collaborative design for the Finnish Teacher Education Development Programme in a decentralised education system where teachers, schools, municipalities and universities have high autonomy. The development programme was designed by 70 experts from the universities and stakeholders. The research outcomes related to teacher education were described, and brainstorming related to the renewal of teacher education was organised at the national level. Brainstorming was aiming to capture opinions of teacher educators and teachers. Moreover, several meetings were organised all over the country. The development programme set out three strategic competence goals for teachers’ pre- and in-service education and continuous life-long professional learning: a broad and solid knowledge base; competences for generating novel ideas and educational innovations; and competences for developing teachers’ own expertise as well as and their schools. Furthermore, the development programme included six concrete strategic guidelines, which helped determine the direction for the development of teacher education.

Keywords

Teacher education, education policy, teacher standards

References

• Akiba, M., & LeTendre, G. (2018). The Routledge International Handbook of Teacher Quality and Policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
• APST. (2014). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Melbourne: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers/standards/list
• Beach, D., Bagley, C. Eriksson, A., & Player-Koro, C. (2016). Changing teacher education in Sweden: Using Meta-ethnographic Analysis to Understand and Describe Policy Making and Educational Changes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 160–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.011
• Beijaard, D., Korthagen, F., & Verloop, N. (2007). Understanding How Teachers Learn as a Prerequisite for Promoting Teacher Learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600601152298
• Blömeke, S., Eklöf, H. Fredriksson, U. Halldórsson, A.M. Jensen, S. S. Kavli, A.-B. Kjærnsli, M. Kjeldsen, C. Nilsen, T. Nissinen, K. Ólafsson, R. F. Oskarsson, M. Rasmusson, M. Rautopuro, J. Reimer, D. Scherer, R. Sortkær, B. Sørensen, H. Wester, A., & Vettenranta. J. (2018). Northern Lights on TIMSS and PISA 2018. TemaNord 2018:524. Cobenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. https://karvi.fi/app/uploads/2018/09/Northern_Lights_on_TIMSS_and_PISA_2018.pdf
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. DOI 10.3316/QRJ0902027.
• Burns,T., & Köster, F. Eds. (2016). Governing Education in a ComplexWorld. Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255364-en
• Caena, F. (2014). Teacher Competence Frameworks in Europe: Policy-as-Discourse and Policy-as-Practice. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 311–31. DOI:10.1111/ejed.12088
• Cochran-Smith, M. (2006). Policy, Practice, and Politics in Teacher Education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
• Cochran-Smith, M., Keefe, E.S., & Carney, M.C. (2018) Teacher Educators as Reformers: Competing Agendas. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(5), 572–90. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2018.1523391
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1999) Reshaping Teaching Policy, Preparation and Practice: influences on the National Board for Teaching Professional Standards. Washington, DC, AACTE Publications. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED432570.pdf
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Research on Teaching and Teacher Education and Its Influences on Policy and Practice. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16639597
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher Education around the World: What Can We Learn from International Practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40 (3), 291–309. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
• Department for Education. (2011), updated 2013. Teachers' Standards: Guidance for School Leaders, School Staff and Governing Bodies. London: DfE. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/665520/Teachers__Standards.pdf
• Eklund, G. (2018). Master’s Thesis as Part of Research-Based Teacher Education: A Finnish Case. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 8(1), 5-20.
• European Commission. (2013). Supporting Teacher Competence Development for Better Learning Outcomes. Brussels: EC. https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/education/experts-groups/2011-2013/teacher/teachercomp_en.pdf
• Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, Professionality and the Development of Education Professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00392.x
• Evetts, J. (2012). Similarities in Contexts and Theorizing: Professionalism and Inequity. Professions and Professionalism, 2(2), 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.7577/
• Feiman-Nemser, S. (2008). Teacher learning: how do teachers learn to teach? In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D. Mcintyre (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. Enduring Questions in Changing Context (pp. 697–705). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis,
• Finland Government Programme. (2015). Finland Government Programme. http://valtioneuvosto.fi/documents/10184/1427398/Ratkaisujen+Suomi_EN_YHDISTETTY_netti.pdf/8d2e1a66-e24a-4073-8303-ee3127fbfcac
• Flores, M.A. (2019). Learning to Be a Teacher: Mentoring, Collaboration and Professional Practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(5), 535–38. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2019.1680207.
• Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. 2012. Reconceptualizing the Knowledge Base of Language Teacher Education. Tesol Quarterly, 32(3), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588114|
• Garm, N., & Karlsen, G. E. (2004). Teacher Education Reform in Europe: The Case of Norway; Trends and Tensions in a Global Perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education 20,(7): 731–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.07.004
• Goe, L., Bell, C., & Little, O. (2008). Approaches to Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness: A Research Synthesis. Washington. DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
• Guerriero, S., & Deligiannidi, K. (2017). The Teaching Profession and Its Knowledge Base. In S. Guerriero (Ed.). Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264270695-3-en.
• Hargreaves, D. (1996). Teaching as a Research-based Profession: Possibilities and Prospects. London: The Teacher Training Agency.
• Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. (2002). A Knowledge Base for the Teaching Profession: What Would It Look Like and How Can We Get One? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031005003
• Holappa, A-S. (2007). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelma 2000-luvulla – uudistus paikallisina prosesseina kahdessa kaupungissa [The Renewal of the Basic Education Curriculum: Case study in two cuties]. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis. series E 94. Oulun yliopisto. Kasvatustieteiden tiedekunta.
• Husu J., & Toom A. (2016). Opettajat ja opettajankoulutus – suuntia tulevaan: Selvitys ajankohtaisesta opettaja- ja opettajankoulutustutkimuksesta opettajankoulutuksen kehittämisohjelman laatimisen tueksi. [Teachers and teacher education – New directions for future: A report on current teacher education research for the Teacher Education Development Programme]. Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja No. 33.
• Ingvarson, L. (2002). Development of a National Standards Framework for the Teaching Profession. An Issues paper prepared for the MCEETYA Taskforce on Teacher Quality and Educational Leadership. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research. http://research.acer.edu.au/teaching_standards
• Kitchen, J., & Figg, C. (2011). Establishing and Sustaining Teacher Educator Professional Development in a Self-Study Community of Practice: Pre-tenure Teacher Educators Developing Professionally. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 880–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.02.003
• Koenraad, T., & van der Hoeff, A. (2013). National Competence Standards for Initial Teacher Education: A Result of Collaboration by Faculties of Education in the Netherlands. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 2(2), 167-194.
• Korthagen, F. A. J. (2016). The Pedagogy of Teacher Education. In J. Loughran & M. L. Hamilton (Eds.). International Handbook of Teacher Education, Volume 1 (pp. 311–46). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Korthagen, F. A. J. (2017). A Foundation for Effective Teacher Education: Teacher Education Pedagogy Based on Situated Learning. In D. J. Clandinin & J. Husu (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. Volume 1. London: Sage.
• Koster, B., & Dengerink, J. J. (2008). Professional standards for teacher educators: how to deal with complexity, ownership and function: Experiences from the Netherlands. European Journal of Teacher Education,31(2),135-149, DOI: 10.1080/02619760802000115
• Lavonen, J. (2018). Educating professional teachers in Finland through the continuous improvement of teacher education programmes. In Y. Weinberger & Z. Libman (Eds.), Contemporary pedagogies in teacher education and development (pp. 3–22). London: IntechOpen.
• Leana, C. R. (2011). The Missing Link in School Reform. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(4), 30–35. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_missing_link_in_school_reform
• Madalińska-Michalak, J., O’Doherty, T., & Flores, M. A. (2018). Teachers and Teacher Education in Uncertain Times. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(5), 567–71. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2018.1532024
• Maier, R., & Schmidt, A. (2015). Explaining Organizational Knowledge Creation with a Knowledge Maturing Model. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(4), 361–81. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.56.
• Malm, B. (2009). Towards a New Professionalism: Enhancing Personal and Professional Development in Teacher Education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 35(1), 77–91. DOI: 10.1080/02607470802587160.
• Maviş, F. Ö, Çaycı, D., & Arslan, M. (2014). Evaluation of Turkey’s Teacher Training System from the Viewpoint of Experienced Teachers (Past, Present and Future). Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 3(1), 91-108.
• Ministry of Education and Culture (MEC). (2016). Opettajankoulutuksen kehittämisohjelma [Development programme for teachers’ pre- and in-service education]. https://minedu.fi/artikkeli/-/asset_publisher/opettajankoulutuksen-kehittamisohjelma-julkistettiin-opetnitelmallisesti-lapi-tyour
• MEC (2018a). Asetus varhaiskasvatuksesta tarkentaa varhaiskasvatuslain säännöksiä [The Decree on Early Childhood Education Clarifies the Provisions of the Early Childhood Education Act]. Helsinki: Ministry of Education and Culuture. https://minedu.fi/artikkeli/-/asset_publisher/asetus-varhaiskasvatuksesta-tarkentaa-varhaiskasvatuslain-saannoksia
• MEC (2018b). Peruskoulufoorumi luovutti esityksensä peruskoulun kehittämislinjauksiksi [The Basic School Forum Published the Developmental plan for the basic school]. Helsinki: Ministry of Education and Culuture. http://minedu.fi/artikkeli/-/asset_publisher/peruskoulufoorumi-luovutti-esityksensa-peruskoulun-kehittamislinjauksiksi
• MEC (2018c). The Eleven Most Important Changes in the Reform of General Upper Secondary Education. Helsinki: Ministry of Education and Culuture. https://minedu.fi/documents/1410845/5394394/11+most+important+changes.pdf/df474839-9c46-4040-b339-0dbfa1bc0eae/11+most+important+changes.pdf.pdf
• Müller, J., Norrie, C., Hernández, F., & Goodson, I. (2010). Restructuring Teachers’ Work-Lives and Knowledge in England and Spain. Compare, 40(3), 265–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057920902830061
• Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2017). Forskrift om rammeplan for grunnskolelærerutdanningene for 1.–7. trinn og 5.–10. trinn. Oslo: Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/6a4066c77c3c45b08044487d8a571a8f/forskrift_rammeplan_grunnskolelaererutdanningene.pdf
• OECD (2013). PISA 2012. Results in Focus. What 15-Year-Olds Know and What They Can Do with What They Know. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
• OECD (2014). Talis 2013 Results: An International Perspective on Teaching and Learning. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/talis-2013-results_9789264196261-en
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Plecki, M., & Loeb, H. (2004) Lessons for Policy Design and Implementation: Examining State and Federal Efforts to Improve Teacher Quality. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education 103(1), 348 – 389. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7984.2004.tb00040.x
• Printy, S. M. (2008). Leadership for Teacher Learning: A Community of Practice Perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 187–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X07312958
• Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2014). Comprehensive School Teachers’ Professional Agency in Large-Scale Educational Change. Journal of Educational Change, 15(3), 303–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-013-9215-8
• Révai, N. (2018). What Difference Do Standards Make to Educating Teachers?: A Review with Case Studies on Australia, Estonia and Singapore. OECD Education Working Paper No. 174. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/WKP(2018)10&docLanguage=En
• Russell, T., McPherson, S., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Coherence and Collaboration in Teacher Education Reform. Canadian Journal of Education, 26(1), 37-55. DOI: 10.2307/1602144
• Sachs, J. (2003) Teacher Professional Standards: Controlling or developing teaching? Teachers and Teaching, 9(2), 175-186, DOI: 10.1080/13540600309373
• Slater, L. (2010) Collaboration: A Framework for School Improvement. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ984546.pdf
• Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish Miracle of PISA: Historical and Sociological Remarks on Teaching and Teacher Education. Comparative Education 41, 455–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060500317810
• Stronge, J. H., & Hindman, J. (2003). Hiring the Best Teachers. Educational Leadership 60, 48–52. //www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/may03/vol60/num08/Hiring-the-Best-Teachers.aspx
• Surowiecki, J. (2005). The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Anchor Books.
• Swedish Council for Higher Education. (2017). Qualifications Ordinance. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Higher Education. https://www.uhr.se/en/start/laws-and-regulations/Laws-and-regulations/The-Higher-Education-Ordinance/Annex-2/
• Tellez, K. (2003). Three Themes on Standards in Teacher Education: Legislative Expediency, the Role of External Review, and Test Bias in the Assessment of Pedagogical Knowledge. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 9–18. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23478413
• Torrance, D., & Forde, C. (2017). Redefining What It Means to Be a Teacher through Professional Standards: Implications for Continuing Teacher Education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 110–26. doi:10.1080/02619768.2016.1246527
• Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. C. (2001). Teacher Knowledge and the Knowledge Base of Teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 441–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00003-4
• Westbury, J. Hansén, S.-H., Kansanen, P., & Björkvist, O. (2005) Teacher Education for Research‐based Practice in Expanded Roles: Finland's experience. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(5), 475-485, DOI: 10.1080/00313830500267937
• Williams, J. (2014). Teacher Educator Professional Learning in the Third Space: Implications for Identity and Practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 315–26. DOI: 10.1177/0022487114533128
• Young, J.C., Hall, C., & Clarke, A. (2007). Challenges to University Autonomy in Initial Teacher Education Programmes: The Cases of England, Manitoba, and British Columbia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 81–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.008