İç Entegrasyonun Lojistik Hız Ve Güvenirlik Üzerindeki Etkisi: Müşteri Entegrasyonun Aracı Rolü

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı firmalarda birimler arası iç entegrasyonun lojistik hız ve güvenirlik üzerine etkisinde müşteri entegrasyonunun arracı rolünü araştırmaktır. Bu kapsamda Gaziantep’de faaliyet gösteren 161 üretim firmasından anket ile veri toplanmıştır. Araştırma için gerekli analizler, SPSS ve AMOS paket programları ile yapılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda iç entegrasyonun müşterientegrasyonunu ve müşteri entegrasyonun lojistik hız ve güvenirliğini pozitif yönde anlamlı olarak etkilediği bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. İç entegrasyonun lojistik hız ve güvenirlik üzerindeki etkisi yapısal eşitlik modelinde bulunamazken process macro yöntemi ile bulgulanmıştır. Ayrıca process macro yöntemiyle yapılan aracılık testi neticesinde iç entegrasyonun lojistik hız ve güvenirlik üzerindeki etkisinde müşteri entegrasyonunun aracı rolünün bulunduğu ispatlanmıştır.

Keywords

• Tedarik Zinciri Entegrasyonu
• İç Entegrasyon
• Müşteri Entegrasyonu
• Lojistik Performansı
• Process Macro

The Impact of Internal Integration on Logistics Speed and Reliability: The Mediating Role of Customer Integration

Abstract

The objective of this research is to investigate the impact of internal integration on speed and reliability in logistics and the mediating role of customer integration. Toward this aim, the study collected data from 161 manufacturing companies operating in Gaziantep by applying the scales through questionnaires. The analysis essential to the research have been conducted using the programs SPSS and AMOS. The results prove internal integration to positively impact customer integration, and customer integration to positively impact logistics speed and reliability. Internal integration’s impact on logistic speed and reliability could not be proven with the structural equation model. However, the process macro results revealed internal integration to positively impact speed and reliability in logistics. Furthermore, the results from the mediation test that was applied using the process macro method have proven customer integration to have an intermediary role in internal integration’s impact on speed and reliability in logistics.

Keywords

• Supply Chain Integration
• Customer Integration
• Internal Integration
• Logistics Performance
• Process Macro

References

1. Bowersox, D.J., Closs, D.J. ve Stank, T.P. (1999). 21st Century Logistics: Making Supply Chan Integration a Reality. Michigan State University.USA: Council of Logistics Management. google scholar
2. Byrnes, J.L., Copacino, W.C, and Metz, P. (1987). Froge Service Into a Weapon With Logistics. Transportation & Distribution, Presidential Issue, Vol. 28, google scholar
3. Chavez, R., Yu, W., Gimenez, C., Fynes, B. ve Wiengarten, F. (2015). Customer integration and operational performance: The mediating role of information quality. Decision Support Systems 80 (2015) 83-95 google scholar
4. Cheng, Y., Chaudhuri, A. ve Farooq, S. (2016). Interplant coordination, supply chain integration, and operational performance of a plant in a manufacturing network: a mediation analysis. Supply Chain Manag.: Int. J. 21, 550-568. google scholar
5. Chow G., Heaver, T.D. and Henriksson, L.E. (1994). Logistics Performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 24(1): 17- 28. google scholar
6. Chow, G., Heaver, T.T, Henriksson, L.E. (1995). Strategy, structure and performance: A framework for logistics research. Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 31, Iss. 4,285. google scholar
7. Çetindaş, A. ve Çelik, M. (2018). İmalat İşletmelerinde Tedarik Zinciri Entegrasyonunun Lojistik Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisinde Çevresel Belirsizliğin Düzenleyici Rolü. Toros Üniversitesi İİSBF Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 4, Sayı 7 google scholar
8. Daugherty, P., Ellinger, A. and Gustin, C. (1996). Integrated logistics: achieving logistics performance improvements. Supply Chain Management, 1: 25-33. google scholar

9. Daugherty, P.J., Chen, H., Mattioda, D.D. and Grawe, S.J. (2009). Marketing/Logistics Relationships: Influence on Capabilities and Performance. Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 1-18. google scholar
10. Deepen, J.M. (2007). Logistics Outsourcing Relationships Measurement, Antecedents, and Effects of Logistics Outsourcing Performance. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag Springer. google scholar
11. Feng, M., Yu, W., Chavez, R., Mangan, J. ve Zhang, X. (2017), "Guanxi and operational performance: the mediating role of supply chain integration", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 117 No. 8, pp. 1650-1668 google scholar
12. Flynn, B.B., Huo, B. ve Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management. 28, 58-71. google scholar
13. Franceschini, F. and Rafele, C. (2000). Quality evaluation in logistics services. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 2: 49-53. google scholar
14. Gimenez, C. and Ventura, E. (2005). Logistics-Production, Logistics-Marketing and External integration: Their Impact on Performance. Inter-national Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 231-249. google scholar
15. Gürbüz, S. (2019). Sosyal Bilimlerde Aracı, Düzenleyici ve Durumsal Etki Analizleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi google scholar
16. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York,NY: Guilford Press google scholar
17. Jajjaa, M.S.S., Chathaa, K.A. ve Farooqb, S. (2018).Impact of supply chain risk on agility performance: Mediating role of supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics 205 (2018) 118-138 google scholar
18. Johnson, W.H.A. ve Filippini, R. (2009) Internal vs. External Collaboration: What Works, Research-Technology Management, 52:3, 15-17, google scholar
19. Kahn, K.B. and Mentzer, J.T. (1996). Logistics and interdepartmental integration. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 26 (8), 6-14. google scholar
20. Kingman-Brundage, J. (1995), “Service mapping: back to basics”, in Glynn, W. and Barnes, J. (Eds), Understanding Services Management,Wiley, Chichester, pp. 119-42. google scholar
21. Koufteros, X., Vonderembse, M. and Jayaram, J. (2005). Internal and external integration for product development: the contingency effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy. Decision Sciences 36 (1), 97-133. google scholar
22. Lau, A.K.W., Tang, E. ve Yam, R.C.M. (2010). Effects of supplier and customer integration on product innovation and performance: empirical evidence in Hong Kong manufacturers. J. Prod. Innovat. Manag. 27, 761-777. google scholar
23. Li, G., Yang, H., Sun, L. and Sohal, A.S. (2009). The impact of IT implementation on supply chain integration and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 120, (1), 125-138 google scholar
24. Meydan, C. H. ve Şeşen, H. (2015). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi: AMOS uygulamaları, (2.Baskı). Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık. google scholar
25. Morash, E.A., Dröge, C. ve Vickery, S. (1997). Boundary-spanning interfaces between logistics, production, marketing and new product development. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 27 (5/6), 350-369. google scholar
26. Narasimhan, R. ve Kim, S.W. (2001). Information system utilization strategy for supply chain integration. J. Bus. Logist. 22, 51-75. google scholar
27. Pagell, M. (2004). Understanding the factors that enable and inhibit the integration of operations, purchasing and logistics. Journal of Operations Management 22, 459-487. google scholar
28. Rodrigues, A.M., Stank, T.P. and Lynch, D.F. (2004). Linking Strategy, Structure, Process and Performance in Integrated Logistics. Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 65-94. google scholar
29. Salvador, F., Forza, C., Rungtusantham, M. and Choi, T.Y. (2001). Supply Chain Interactions and Time-Related Performances. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 461-475.) google scholar
30. Sekaran, U. (1992). Research methods for business. Canada: John Wiley ve Sons, Inc. google scholar
31. Stank, T.P., Keller, S.B. ve Daugherty, P.J. (2001). Supplychain Collaboration and Logistical service Performance. Journal of Business Logistics, Vol.22, No.1, p. 29-48 google scholar
32. Waters, D. (2003). Logistics: An Introduction to Supply Chain Management. (1.Baskı). New York: Palgrave Macmillan google scholar
33. Wong, C.Y., Boon-itt, S. and Wong, C.W.Y. (2011). The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance. Journal of Operations Management 29 (2011) 604-615 google scholar
34. Wood, D.F., Barone, A.P., Murphy, P.R. and Wardlow, D.L. (2002). International Logistics. (2.nd. Ed). USA: Amacom google scholar
35. Yamak, O. (2001). Üretim Yönetimi (2. Baskı). İstanbul: Sinerji Yayınları google scholar
36. Yeung, A.C.L. (2006). The Impact of Third-Party Logistics Performance on the Logistics and Export Performance of Users: An Empirical Study, Maritime Economics & Logistics, 8, (121-139 google scholar
37. Zhao, X., Huo, B., Selen,W. ve Yeung, J.H.Yç (2011). The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration, Journal of Operations Management, Volume 29, Issues 1-2, Pages 17-32 google scholar