Determination and Evaluation of Alternatives for Post-Earthquake Temporary Sheltering Area

Abstract

After natural disasters like earthquakes, identifying the locations of disaster victims and establishing temporary shelter areas are essential for their mental and physical well-being. Evaluating and determining such areas has been a key focus for researchers to provide decision-makers with data to create suitable solutions. Türkiye, located in a disaster-prone region, experienced two major earthquakes centered in Kahramanmaraş in February 2023. This study focuses on determining the temporary shelter areas in Hatay, a severely affected province. The research consists of two main parts: (i) The suitability of neighborhoods and districts for post-disaster settlement is evaluated based on logistics, transportation, and infrastructure. Additionally, seismicity and liquefaction safety coefficients were used to calculate the suitability values. Findings show that the neighborhoods in the Reyhanlı district align well with the determined criteria. (ii) Temporary shelter areas are selected using the p-median model, which is applied to solve the location selection problems. Results indicate that if five shelter sites are to be established, one should be located in Kumlu, while the remaining four should be in the Erzin district. These findings aim to provide a systematic approach for planning post-disaster temporary shelters in earthquake-affected regions.

Keywords

• Temporary Shelter Areas
• Site Selection
• p-Median
• Multi-Criteria Decision Making
• Mathematical Modeling

References

1. Anadolu Ajansı. (2023, Şubat 7). Adana, Hatay ve Osmaniye'de depremden etkilenenler geçici barınma alanları ve çadırlarda konaklıyor. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/adana-hatay-ve-osmaniyede-depremden-etkilenenler-gecici-barinma-alanlari-ve-cadirlarda-konakliyor/2811475 google scholar
2. Aman, D. D., & Aytaç, G. (2022). Multi-criteria decision making for city-scale infrastructure of post-earthquake assembly areas: Case study of Istanbul. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 67, 102668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102668 google scholar
3. Amudha, M., Ramachandran, M., Saravanan, V., Anusuya, P., & Gayathri, R. (2021). A study on TOPSIS MCDM techniques and its application. Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 9-14. google scholar
4. Arca, D., & Keskin Çıtıroğlu, H. (2023). GIS-based evaluation of disaster and emergency assembly areas with AHP in local scale. In Interdisciplinary studies on contemporary research practices in engineering in the 21st century–III (pp. 131–148). Özgür Yayınevi. google scholar
5. Aşıkkutlu, H. S., Aşık, Y., & Kaya, L. G. (2021). Determination of temporary shelter areas by the analytic hierarchy process method: The case of Burdur City Center, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 9(4), 807-813. google scholar
6. Aydin, N., & Seker, S. (2021). Determining the location of isolation hospitals for COVID‐19 via Delphi‐based MCDM method. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36(6), 3011-3034. google scholar
7. Baharmand, H., & Comes, T. (2015, May). A Framework for Shelter Location Decisions by Ant Colony Optimization. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM). google scholar
8. Bayram, V., Tansel, B. Ç., & Yaman, H. (2015). Compromising system and user interests in shelter location and evacuation planning. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 72, 146-163. google scholar

9. Bayram, V., & Yaman, H. (2018). A stochastic programming approach for shelter location and evacuation planning. RAIRO-Operations Research-Recherche Opérationnelle, 52(3), 779-805. google scholar
10. Boonmee, C., Naotaka, I., Takumi, A., & Mikiharu, A. (2016). Multi-model optimization for shelter-site selection: A case study in Banta municipality, Thailand. Proc. of Infrastructure Planning in Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 53, 2175-2181. google scholar
11. Boostani, A., Jolai, F., & Bozorgi-Amiri, A. (2018). Optimal location selection of temporary accommodation sites in Iran via a hybrid fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making approach. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 144(4), 04018039. google scholar
12. Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. P. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer-Verlag. google scholar
13. Celik, E. (2017). A cause and effect relationship model for location of temporary shelters in disaster operations management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 257-268. google scholar
14. Chu, J., & Su, Y. (2012). The application of TOPSIS method in selecting fixed seismic shelter for evacuation in cities. Systems Engineering Procedia, 3, 391-397. google scholar
15. Current, J., Daskin, M., & Schilling, D. (2002). Discrete network location models. In Z. Drezner & H. W. Hamacher (Eds.), Facility location: Applications and theory (Vol. 1, pp. 81–118). Springer. google scholar
16. Çınar, A. K., Akgün, Y., & Maral, H. (2018). Analyzing The Planning Criteria for Emergency Assembly Points and Temporary Shelter Areas: Case of İzmir-Karşıyaka. Planning, 28(2), 179-200. google scholar
17. Dabiri, M., Sarvari, H., Chan, D. W., & Olawumi, T. O. (2022). Developing a hybrid risk assessment method for prioritizing the critical risks of temporary accommodation sites after destructive earthquakes. Habitat International, 128, 102667. google scholar
18. Dayanır, H., Çınar, A. K., Akgün, Y. & Çorumluoğlu, Ö. (2022). Post-Disaster Temporary Shelter Area Selection and Planning by Using Delphi Method: Izmir/Seferihisar Case, Journal of Natural Hazards and Environment, 8(1), 87-102. google scholar
19. Doğruyol, F. Y., & Taktak, F. (2022). Assessment of the post-disaster assembly areas in the Merkez District of Uşak Province in Turkey. Advanced Land Management, 2(1), 1-12. google scholar
20. Erdin, H. E., Çelik, H. Z., Aydın, M. B. S., & Partigöç, N. S. (2023). Afet ve acil durumlarda sosyal altyapı alanlarının toplanma alanı olarak belirlenme kriterleri ve yöntemi. Türk Deprem Araştırma Dergisi, 5(1), 1-21. google scholar
21. Eriskin, L., & Karatas, M. (2022). Applying robust optimization to the shelter location–allocation problem: a case study for Istanbul. Annals of Operations Research, 1-47. google scholar
22. Ersöz F., & Kabak M. (2010). Savunma Sanayi Uygulamalarında Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemlerinin Literatür Araştırması. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 97-125. google scholar
23. Félix, D., Branco, J. M., & Feio, A. (2013). Temporary housing after disasters: A state of the art survey. Habitat International, 40, 136-141. google scholar
24. Geng, S., Hou, H., & Zhou, Z. (2021). A hybrid approach of VIKOR and bi-objective decision model for emergency shelter location– allocation to respond to earthquakes. Mathematics, 9(16), 1897. google scholar
25. Gerdan, S., & Şen, A. (2020). Kocaeli/Başiskele İlçesi Afet ve Acil Durum Toplanma Alanlarının Yeterliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 8(2), 489-500. google scholar
26. Givechi, S., Attar, M. A., Rashidi, A., & Nasbi, N. (2013). Site selection of temporary housing after earthquake by GIS and AHP method Case study: Region 6 of Shiraz. Urban-Regional Studies and Research Journal, 5(17), 29-32. google scholar
27. Güler, E., Avcı, S., & Aladağ, Z. (2022). Evaluation of Crıieria Effecting The Selection Of Temporary Shelter Areas By DEMATEL-SWARA Methods. International Journal of Western Black Sea Engineering and Science, 4(2), 57-74. google scholar
28. Güngör, S., & Dikgöz, E. (2023). Evaluation of the Capacity and Sufficiency of Sakura Park in Selçuklu District of Konya Province as a PostDisaster Assembly Area. International Congresses of Turkish Science and Technology Publishing, 39-45. google scholar
29. Hosseini, S. A., De la Fuente, A., & Pons, O. (2016). Multicriteria decision-making method for sustainable site location of post-disaster temporary housing in urban areas. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(9), 04016036. google scholar
30. Hosseini, K. A., Tarebari, S. A., & Mirhakimi, S. A. (2022). A new index-based model for site selection of emergency shelters after an earthquake for Iran. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 77, 103110. google scholar
31. Işık, F., Bahadır, M., & Uzun, A. (2019). Karaçam Deresi Havzası'nda Çığa Duyarlı Alanların Belirlenmesi (Trabzon, Türkiye). Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 24(42), 1-15. google scholar
32. Junian, J., & Azizifar, V. (2018). The evaluation of temporary shelter areas locations using geographic information system and analytic hierarchy process. Civil Engineering Journal, 4(7), 1678-1688. google scholar
33. Kalkan, M. (2022). Uşak Kentinde Belirlenen Afet ve Acil Durum Toplanma Alanlarının Yeterliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Resilience, 6(2), 269-285. google scholar
34. Karaman, B., & Çerçioğlu, H. (2015). 0-1 hedef programlama destekli bütünleşik ahp–vikor yöntemi: hastane yatirimi projeleri seçimi. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(4), 567-576. google scholar
35. Karaman, H., & Erden, T. (2014). Net earthquake hazard and elements at risk (NEaR) map creation for city of Istanbul via spatial multicriteria decision analysis. Natural Hazards, 73, 685-709. google scholar
36. Kaya, N. S., Dengiz, O., & Dedeoğlu, M. (2022, December 2–3). Remote estimation of the relationship between erosion risk classes using the Neutrosophic Fuzzy-AHP and RE-OSAVI for Sinop Province. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Samsun, Turkey. google scholar
37. Kınay, Ö. B., Kara, B. Y., Saldanha-da-Gama, F., & Correia, I. (2018). Modeling the shelter site location problem using chance constraints: A case study for Istanbul. European Journal of Operational Research, 270(1), 132-145. google scholar
38. Kılcı, F., Kara, B. Y., & Bozkaya, B. (2015). Locating temporary shelter areas after an earthquake: A case for Turkey. European Journal of Operational Research, 243(1), 323-332. google scholar
39. Li, A. C., Nozick, L., Xu, N., & Davidson, R. (2012). Shelter location and transportation planning under hurricane conditions. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(4), 715-729. google scholar
40. Liou, J. J., Chang, M. H., Lo, H. W., & Hsu, M. H. (2021). Application of an MCDM model with data mining techniques for green supplier evaluation and selection. Applied Soft Computing, 109, 107534. google scholar
41. Liu, K. (2022). GIS-based MCDM framework combined with coupled multi-hazard assessment for site selection of post-earthquake emergency medical service facilities in Wenchuan, China, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 73, 102873. google scholar
42. Ma, Y., Xu, W., Qin, L., Zhao, X., & Du, J. (2019). Emergency shelters location-allocation problem concerning uncertainty and limited resources: a multi-objective optimization with a case study in the Central area of Beijing, China. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 10(1), 1242-1266. google scholar
43. Nappi, M. M. L., Nappi, V., & Souza, J. C. (2019). Multi-criteria decision model for the selection and location of temporary shelters in disaster management. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 4(1), 1-19. google scholar
44. Omidvar, B., Baradaran‐Shoraka, M., & Nojavan, M. (2013). Temporary site selection and decision‐making methods: a case study of Tehran, Iran. Disasters, 37(3), 536-553. google scholar
45. Ozbay, E., Çavuş, Ö., & Kara, B. Y. (2019). Shelter site location under multi-hazard scenarios. Computers & Operations Research, 106, 102-118. google scholar
46. Ömürgönülşen, M., & Menten, C. (2021). Bulanık TOPSIS yöntemi ile Ankara ili için olası afet sonrası geçici barınma alanlarının seçimi. Doğal Afetler ve Çevre Dergisi, 7(1), 159-175. google scholar
47. Öztürk, F., & Kaya, G. K. (2020). Afet Sonrası Toplanma Alanlarının PROMETHEE Metodu ile Değerlendirilmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(3), 1239-1252. google scholar
48. Partigöç, N. S. (2023). Afet Sonrası Toplanma Alanlarına Yönelik Kapasite Yeterliliğinin Değerlendirilmesi: Merkezefendi İlçesi (Denizli) Örneği. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, 6(1), 128-147. google scholar
49. Perrucci, D., & Baroud, H. (2020). A review of temporary housing management modeling: Trends in design strategies, optimization models, and decision-making methods. Sustainability, 12(24), 10388. google scholar
50. Saadatseresht, M., Mansourian, A., & Taleai, M. (2009). Evacuation planning using multiobjective evolutionary optimization approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 198(1), 305-314. google scholar
51. Saaty, T. L. (1988). What is the analytic hierarchy process? In R. W. Faulkner, B. L. Golden, & E. A. Wasil (Eds.), The analytic hierarchy process: Applications and studies (pp. 109–121). Springer. google scholar
52. Sayar, M. A. (2018). Çadırkent tesisi için en uygun yerin AHP yöntemiyle belirlenmesi: Suruç ilçesi örneği (Doctoral dissertation, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey). National Thesis Center of Turkey. google scholar
53. Şahin, Y., & Altın, F. G. (2016). An assignment model for shelter site selection problem: a case of Isparta. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(16), 323-336. google scholar
54. Şahin, Y., & Hazırcı, M. (2019). Geçici İskân Alanlarının Seçimi için AHP Temelli P-Medyan Modeli: Burdur Örneği. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 7(2), 403-417. google scholar
55. Şekkeli, Z. H. (2020). Afet ve acil durum lojistiği kapsamında acil durum toplanma merkezi seçiminde AHP yöntemi: Kahramanmaraş on iki şubat belediyesinde bir uygulama. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 903-930. google scholar
56. Şentürk, E., & Erener, A. (2017). Determination of temporary shelter areas in natural disasters by gis: A case study, Gölcük/Turkey. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 2(3), 84-90. google scholar
57. Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77-87. google scholar
58. Triantaphyllou, E., & Mann, S. H. (1995). Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice, 2(1), 35-44. google scholar
59. Trivedi, A., & Singh, A. (2017). A hybrid multi-objective decision model for emergency shelter location relocation projects using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and goal programming approach. International Journal of Project Management, 35(5), 827-840. google scholar
60. Widener, M. J., Horner, M. W. (2011). A hierarchical approach to modeling hurricane disaster relief goods distribution, Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 821-828. google scholar
61. Yüzer, V., et al. (2024). Şubat 2023 depremlerinin bölgede oluşturduğu etkiler ve yapay zeka ile afet yönetim planlaması (Güdümlü Proje No. 5734). Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi. google scholar
62. Zengin Çelik, H., Sılaydın Aydın, M. B., Partigöç, N. S., & Erdin, H. E. (2018, May). Deprem riskleri bağlamında toplanma alanlarının güvenlik kriterleri temelinde değerlendirilmesi: Bayraklı (İzmir) örneği. In International Symposium on Natural Hazards and Disaster Management (pp. 612-624). google scholar
63. Zimmermann, H. J., & Zysno, P. (1985). Quantifying vagueness in decision models. European Journal of Operational Research, 22(2), 148-158. google scholar