Measuring Digital Divide in E-Commerce by Log-Linear Models and Non-Parametric Tests: An Application of Turkey

Yıl 2020, , 93 - 104, 20.11.2020

Sultan Kuzu Yıldırım Çiğdem Arıcıgil Çilan

https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2020.0018

Öz

The purpose of the study is to examine the relationships between individuals who engage in e-commerce and their demographic factors and to investigate whether their status of e-commerce engagement differentiates according to demographic factors. In case of differences, demographic factors caused by the Digital Divide were examined. If Digital Division is not detected, the reasons for this are emphasized. For this purpose, the overall profile of the customer group engaged in e-commerce in Turkey was summarized, and the demographic variables that e-commerce is associated with were determined using Non-Parametric techniques. Then, utilizing the Log-Linear Models, one of the methods of the Advanced Contingency Table Analysis, the effects including two-way and three-way interactions were investigated. Consequently, among those who engage in e-commerce in Turkey, it was determined that education caused the digital divide, however, gender remained ineffective.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital Divide, E-Commerce, Contingency Table, Non-Parametric Tests, Log-Linear Models

Kaynakça

• Agresti, A., (1996). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons,Inc, USA.
• Agresti, A., (2002). Categorical data analysis, second edition, John Wiley & Sons,Inc, USA.
• Arıcıgil Çilan, Ç., (2009). Sosyal bilimlerde kategorik verilerle ilişki analizi, Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
• Canpolat, Önder, (2001). E-Ticaret ve Türkiye’deki gelişmeler, T.C. Sanayi ve Ticaret Bakanlığı Hukuk Müşavirliği.
• Kalaycı, C. (2013). Dijital bölünme, dijital yoksulluk ve uluslararası ticaret. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi,27(3), 145-162.
• Kılıç, Ç. (2011). Küreselleşen dünyada dijital bölünme sorunu. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 81-91
• Donna L. Hoffman, Thomas P. Novak, (1998). Bridging the Racial Divide on the Internet. Science, 280(5362), 390-391.
• Eric Tsetsi & Stephen A. Rains, (2017). Smartphone internet access and use: Extending the digital divide and usage gap. Mobile Media & Communication,5(3), 239–255
• Hargittai, E. (2003). The Digital Divide and What to Do about it?, New Economy Hand Book, Chapter 35, Elsevier Science USA.
• Keniston, K., & Kumar, D. (2003). The four digital divides, In Press at Sage Publishers
• Jan A.G.M. van Dijk, (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings, Poetics, 34(4-5), 221–235.
• Marı ́a Rosalı ́a Vicente Cuervo & Ana Jesu ́s Lo ́pez Mene ́ndez (2006). A multivariate framework for the analysis of the digital divide: evidence for the european union-15. Information & Management, 43(6), 756-766.
• Menzie D. Chinn Robert W. Fairlie, (2007). The determinants of the global digital divide: a cross-country analysis of computer and internet penetration. Oxford Economic Papers,59(1) 16-44.
• Dragulanescu, N. G. (2002). Social impact of the “Digital Divide” in a Central–Eastern European country. The International Information & Library Review,34(2), 139-151.
• OECD, (2007) Understanding the Digital Divide, https://www.oecd.org/sti/1888451.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 11.07.2017, 1-32.
• Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2007). Digital inequality: A five country comparison using microdata. Social Science Research, 36(3), 1135-1155.
• Brandtzæg, P. B., Heim, J., & Karahasanović, A. (2011). Understanding the new digital divide—A typology of Internet users in Europe. International journal of human-computer studies, 69(3), 123-138.
• Cohendet, P. (2003). The digital divide in the European enlarged economic scenario: an assessment of the socio-economic effects. Strasbourg: University Louis Pasteur.
• Friemel, T. N. (2014) The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 18(2), 313-331.
• Kennedy, T., Wellman, B., & Klement, K. (2003). Gendering the digital divide. IT & society,1(5), 72-9