ÖAİ’de tür analizi: Aşama analizi modelleri ve üstsöylem taksonomileri üzerine bir inceleme

Year 2021, , 67 - 85, 29.04.2021

Rabia Ötügen , Mehmet Takkaç , Oktay Yağız

https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.877595

Abstract

Tür analizi, son yıllarda büyük ilgi görmektedir. Hem akademik hem de pedagojik amaçlarla, farklı türlerden metinler retorik özellikleri açısından analiz edilmektedir. Özel Amaçlı İngilizce (ÖAİ) yaklaşımında tür analizi, aşamalar ve adımlar şeklinde tanımlanan iletişimsel işlevler ve bu işlevlerin dilsel özelliklerine odaklanır. Hem yapısal hem de dilsel yönleri olan böyle bir analiz için araştırmacılar genellikle model ve taksonomiler kullanmaktadırlar. Ancak, alan yazında araştırmacıların farklı türlerin analizi için kullanabileceği birçok model ve taksonomi bulunmaktadır. Bu nedenle, bu çalışma, uzun yıllar boyunca ortaya konulan aşama analizi modellerini ve üstsöylem taksonomilerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, tür analizinde ÖAİ yaklaşımını açıklamakta ve ardından yirminci yüzyılın ikinci yarısından bu yana sunulan modellerin ve taksonomilerin kapsamlı bir incelemesini sunmaktadır. Çalışmanın, ÖAİ'de tür analizinin temelleri belirtmek ve tür analizi alanında yaygın olarak kullanılan model ve taksonomilerin kapsamlı bir özetini sunmak suretiyle, hem alandaki araştırmacılara hem de akademik yazım eğitimi alanlara yardımcı olması beklenmektedir.

Genre analysis in ESP: A review of move analysis models and metadiscourse taxonomies

Abstract

Genre analysis has received much attention in the last decades. For both academic and pedagogical purposes, different genres have been analysed in terms of their rhetorical features. In English for Specific Purposes (ESP) tradition, genre analysis focuses on communicative functions described in terms of moves and steps, and linguistic properties of these functions. For such an analysis having both structural and linguistic aspects, researchers typically use models and taxonomies. However, there are several models and taxonomies in the literature that researchers can use for the analysis of different genres. Therefore, this study aims to review the move analysis models and metadiscourse taxonomies presented over many years. It clarifies the ESP approach to genre analysis and then provides a comprehensive review of the models and taxonomies offered since the second half of the twentieth century. It is expected that the study will help both researchers in the field and learners of academic writing by specifying the basics of genre analysis in ESP and providing a comprehensive account of the models and taxonomies used commonly in the genre analysis literature.

Keywords

Genre analysis, English for specific purposes (ESP), move analysis models, metadiscourse taxonomies

References

• Adel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Allison, D. (2002). Approaching English language research. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
• Anthony, L. (1999). Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard model? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42(1), 38-46. doi:10.1109/47.749366
• Bawarshi, A. S., & Reiff, M. J. (2010). Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. West Lafayette, Ind: Parlor Press.
• Beauvais, P. J. (1989). A speech act theory of metadiscourse. Written Communication, 6(1), 11-30. doi:10.1177/0741088389006001002
• Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/ culture/ power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 47-59. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(94)90024-8
• Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher level metatext in Ph.D theses [Supplement 1]. English for Specific Purposes, 18, S41-S56. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2
• Cao, F., & Hu, G. (2014). Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences. Journal of Pragmatics, 66, 15-31. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.007
• Carter-Thomas, S., & Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2003). Analysing the scientific conference presentation (CP), A methodological overview of a multimodal genre. ASp. la revue du GERAS, 39-40, 59-72. doi:10.4000/asp.1295
• Cheng, S.W. (2012). “That’s it for today”: Academic lecture closings and the impact of class size. English for Specific Purposes, 31(4), 234-248. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2012.05.004
• Connor, U. (2000). Variation in rhetorical moves in grant proposals of US humanists and scientists. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 20(1), 1-28. doi:10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.1
• Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2017). A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating rigour and credibility. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 90-106. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001
• Crismore, A. (1983a). Metadiscourse: What it is and how it is used in school and non-school social science texts (Report No. 273). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
• Crismore, A. (1983b). The rhetoric of social studies textbooks: Metadiscourse. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED239226.pdf
• Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. S. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10(1), 39-71. doi:10.1177/0741088393010001002
• Crookes, G. (1986). Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 57-70. doi:10.1093/applin/7.1.57
• Ding, H. (2007). Genre analysis of personal statements: Analysis of moves in application essays to medical and dental schools. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 368-392. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2006.09.004
• Dos Santos, V.B.M.P. (2002). Genre analysis of business letters of negotiation. English for Specific Purposes, 21(2), 167-199. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00028-4
• Dubois, B. 1980. Genre and structure of biomedical speeches. Forum Linguisticum, 5(2), 140-168.
• Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 219-228). London: Routledge.
• Enkvist, (1978). Introduction: Text, Cohesion, and Coherence. In J.O.Ostman (Ed.), Reports on text linguistics: Cohesion and semantics (pp. 99-131). Finland: Abo Akademi. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED275183.pdf
• Flowerdew, J. (2002). Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach. In A.M.Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp.91-102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Halleck, G. B., & Connor, U. M. (2006). Rhetorical moves in TESOL conference proposals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 70-86. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2005.08.001
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). The functional basis of language. In J. Webster (Ed.), On language and linguistics (pp. 298-323). London: Continuum.
• Harris, Z. S. (1959a). The transformational model of language structure. Anthropological Linguistics, 1(1), 27-29. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/30022172
• Harris, Z. S. (1959b). Linguistic transformations for information retrieval. Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information:Vol.2. Organization of Information for Storage and Retrospective Search: Intellectual problems and equipment considerations in the design of new systems (pp. 937-951). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/10866.
• Hirano, E. (2009). Research article introductions in English for specific purposes: A comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English. English for Specific Purposes, 28(4), 240-250. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2009.02.001
• Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321-337. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00038-5
• Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7(2), 113-121. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(88)90029-4
• Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO's letter. The Journal of Business Communication, 35(2), 224-244. doi:10.1177%2F002194369803500203
• Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
• Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177. doi:10.1093/applin/25.2.156
• Jacobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and Poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in Language (pp. 350-377). Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
• Johns, A. M. (2013). Rhetorical genre studies (RGS) and the teaching of EFL reading and writing–or genre is much more than text structure. In X. Deng., & R. Seow (Eds.), Alternative pedagogies in the English language & communication classroom (pp. 1-8). Singapore: CELC.
• Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269-292. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
• Kwan, B. S. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 30-55. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2005.06.001
• Lakic, I. (1997). Genre analysis of article introductions in economics. ASp. la revue du GERAS, (15-18), 409-426. doi:10.4000/asp.3239
• Lautamatti, L. (1978). Observations on the development of the topic in simplified discourse. AFinLAn vuosikirja, 8(22), 71-104. Retrieved from https://journal.fi/afinlavk/article/view/57428
• Lee, J. J. (2009). Size matters: An exploratory comparison of small-and large-class university lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 42-57. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2008.11.001
• Lee, J. J. (2016). “There's intentionality behind it…”: A genre analysis of EAP classroom lessons. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 99-112. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2015.12.007
• Loi, C. K. (2010). Research article introductions in Chinese and English: A comparative genre-based study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(4), 267-279. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2010.09.004
• Martin, J. R. (2002). Meaning beyond the clause: SFL perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 52-74. doi:10.1017/S026719050200003X
• Mauranen, A. (1993a). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes, 12(1), 3-22. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-I
• Mauranen, A. (1993b). Cultural differences in academic discourse–problems of a linguistic and cultural minority. AFinLAn vuosikirja, 51, 157-174. Retrieved from https://journal.fi/afinlavk/article/view/57853
• Mežek, Š., & Swales, J. (2016). PhD defences and vivas. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp. 361-375). London: Routledge.
• Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151-167. doi: 10.1080/00335638409383686
• Nodoushan, M., & Khakbaz, N. (2011). Theses ‘Discussion’ sections: A structural move analysis. International Journal of Language Studies, 5(3), 111-132. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED521873.pdf
• Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119-138. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4
• Paltridge, B. (2011). Genre and English for specific purposes. Retrieved from https://genreacrossborders.org/research/genre-and-english-specific-purposes
• Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30(4), 479-497. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7
• Pérez-Llantada, C. (2015). Genres in the forefront, languages in the background: The scope of genre analysis in language-related scenarios. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 10-21. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.005
• Posteguillo, S. (1999). The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 139-160. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00001-5
• Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 1-17. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00023-5
• Shamsudin, S., & Ebrahimi, S. J. (2013). Analysis of the moves of engineering lecture introductions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1303-1311. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.191
• Swales, J. M. (1981). Aspects of article introductions (Report No. 1). Birmingham: University of Aston.
• Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Swales, J. M. (2011). Aspects of article introductions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (2nd ed). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• Taylor, G., Chen, T. (1991).Linguistic, cultural, and subcultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts. Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 319-336. doi:10.1093/applin/12.3.319
• Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 58-78. doi:10.1093/applin/22.1.58
• Thompson, S. (1994). Frameworks and contexts: A genre-based approach to analysing lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 171-186. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(94)90014-0
• Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36(1), 82-93. doi: 10.2307/357609
• Williams, I. A. (1999). Results sections of medical research articles: Analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 18(4), 347-366. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00003-9
• Williams, J. M. (1981). Style: Lessons in clarity and grace (9th ed.). New York: Pearson Longman.
• Yang, R., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365-385. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1
• Yang, W. (2015). “Call for papers”: Analysis of the schematic structure and lexico-grammar of CFPs for academic conferences. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 39-51. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.006
• Zhang, M., Sun, W., Peng, H., Gan, Q., & Yu, B. (2017). A multidimensional analysis of metadiscourse markers across spoken registers. Journal of Pragmatics, 117, 106-118. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.06.004