Construction of a Science Teacher's Topic-Specific Pedagogical Content Knowledge in the Gifted Class

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 378 - 401, 31.08.2024

Burak Çaylak , Jale Çakıroğlu

https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.1491730

Öz

This study examines a science teacher's pedagogical content knowledge during instruction on the topics work and energy, simple machines, and friction force in a gifted class. The research adopts a single case study approach, employing qualitative methods. The participant is a middle school science teacher, and data collection tools include interviews, observations, card-sorting activities, and lesson plans. The study’s data were analyzed in an in-depth analysis of explicit PCK. The main findings of the study are: (1) gifted students required additional science practice beyond the scope of the traditional curriculum, (2) the participating teacher encountered challenges when designing and implementing enrichment activities, (3) the characteristics of gifted students positively influenced the development of the teacher's pedagogical content knowledge, and (4) the presence of gifted students prompted a shift in the teacher's science teaching orientation from traditional methods to reform-based practices. Teachers need to have additional knowledge bases or pedagogical content knowledge components. Notably, the research underscores the relevance of the knowledge of enrichment curriculum and knowledge of characteristics of gifted students in the training of science teachers, along with the crucial role of STO in the education of gifted students, especially in the context of teaching physics. These findings offer significant implications for the curriculum designed for gifted students, particularly concerning the teaching and learning of physics topics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Characteristics of gifted students, enrichment activities in physics topics, pedagogical content knowledge, teacher preparation standards, qualitative design

Kaynakça

• Abdul Razak, R., Mat Yusoff, S., Hai Leng, C., & Mohamadd Marzaini, AF. (2023). Evaluating teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in implementing classroom-based assessment: A case study among esl secondary school teachers in Selangor, Malaysia. PLOS ONE 18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293325
• Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 1105-1151). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1405-1416.
• Ahtee, M., & Johnston, J. (2006). Primary student teachers' ideas about teaching a physics topic. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50, 207–219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600576021
• Akar, I. (2020). Consensus on the competencies for a classroom teacher to support gifted students in the regular classroom: A Delphi study. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16, 67-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.6
• Akgül, G. (2021). Teachers’ metaphors and views about gifted students and their education. Gifted Education International, 37, 273-289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429421988927
• Antoun, M., Plunkett, M., & Kronborg, L. (2022). Gifted education in Lebanon: Time to rethink teaching the gifted, Roeper Review, 44, 94-110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2043502
• Aydın, S. (2012). Examination of chemistry teachers’ topic-specific nature of pedagogical content knowledge in electrochemistry and radioactivity. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara.
• Ayvacı, H. Ş., & Bebek, G. (2023). The effect of STEM-based activity designed for gifted students on students' scientific creativity and cognitive achievement. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 12, 422-441. doi: https://doi.org/10.52963/PERR_Biruni_V12.N2.05
• Bangel, N. J., Moon, S. M., & Capobianco, B. M. (2010). Preservice teachers’ perceptions and experiences in a gifted education training model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 209–221. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210369257
• Baxter, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Assessment and content measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp.147-162). Boston: Kluwer.
• Benny, N., & Blonder, R. (2016). Factors that promote/inhibit teaching gifted students in a regular class: Results from a professional development program for chemistry teachers. Education Research International, (1-11). doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2742905
• Benny, N., & Blonder, R. (2018). Interactions of chemistry teachers with gifted students in a regular high-school chemistry classroom. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 19, 122-134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00127D
• Bélanger, J., & Gagné, F. (2006). Estimating the size of the gifted/talented population from multiple identification criteria. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 131–163. doi: https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2006-258
• Brevik, L. M., Gunnulfsen, A. E., & Renzulli, J. S. (2018). Student teachers’ practice and experience with differentiated instruction for students with higher learning potential. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 34-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.003.
• Callahan, C. M., Moon T. R., & Oh, S. (2014). National surveys of gifted programs, executive summary 2014. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented University of Virginia Curry School of Education. Charlottesville, Virginia.
• Carlson, J., & Daehler, K. R. (2019). The refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching science (pp.77–92). Springer.
• Chan, D. W. (2001). Characteristics and competencies of teachers of gifted learners: The Hong Kong teacher perspective. Roeper Review, 23, 197-202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190109554098
• Chan, D.W. (2011). Characteristics and competencies of teachers of gifted learners: The Hong Kong student perspective. Roeper Review, 33, 160-169. doi:10.1080/02783193.2011.580499
• Chan, K. K. H., & Hume, A. (2019). Towards a consensus model: Literature review of how science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge is investigated in empirical studies. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching science, (pp.3–76). Springer.
• Clark, B. (2008). Growing up gifted (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Coleman, L. J. (2003). Gifted‐child pedagogy: Meaningful chimera? Roeper Review, 25, 163-164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554222
• Coleman, L. J. (2014). The cognitive map of a master teacher conducting discussions with gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37, 40-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214521493
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
• Croft, L. J. (2003). Teachers of the gifted: Gifted teachers. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.) Handbook of Gifted Education (pp. 558-571). Allyn & Bacon.
• Çalıkoğlu, B. S., & Kahveci, N. G. (2015). Altering depth and complexity in the science curriculum for the gifted: Results of an experiment. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16(1), 1-22.
• Edinger, M. J. (2017). Online teacher professional development for gifted education: Examining the impact of a new pedagogical model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 300-312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217722616
• Edinger, M. J. (2020). What’s in your gifted education online teacher professional development? Incorporating theory- and practice-based elements of instructional learning design. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64, 1–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220938051
• Eilam, B., & Vidergor, H. E. (2011). Gifted Israeli students' perceptions of teachers' desired characteristics: A case of cultural orientation. Roeper Review, 33, 86-96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.554156
• Erduran Avcı, D. (2019). İş. In C. Laçin Şimşek (Ed), Fen öğretiminde kavram yanılgılarının tespiti ve giderilmesi (pp. 191-218). Pegem Akademi: Ankara.
• Fiddyment, G. (2014). Implementing enrichment clusters in elementary schools: Lessons learned. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(4), 287-296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214547635
• Friedrichsen, P. M., & Dana, T. M. (2003). Using a card-sorting task to elicit and clarify science-teaching orientations. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14, 291-309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000009551.37237.b3
• Friedrichsen, P. M., & Dana, T. M. (2005). Substantive-level theory of highly regarded secondary biology teachers' science teaching orientations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 218–244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20046
• Friedrichsen, P., van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95, 358–376. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20428
• Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15, 119–147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000314682
• Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28-42). Routledge.
• Gilbert, J. K., & Newberry, M. (2007). The characteristics of the gifted and exceptionally able in science. In K. S. Taber (Ed.), Science education for gifted learners (pp. 15-31). Routledge.
• Gilson, T. (2009). Creating school programs for gifted students at the high school level: An administrator’s perspective. Gifted Child Today, 32, 36–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2009-878
• Godor, B. P. (2019). Gifted metaphors: Exploring the metaphors of teachers in gifted education and their impact on teaching the gifted. Roeper Review, 41, 51-60, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1553219
• Gómez-Arízaga, M. P., Conejeros-Solar, M. L., & Martin, A. (2016). How good is good enough? A community-based assessment of teacher competencies for gifted students. SAGE Open, 61-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016680687
• Gubbins, E. J, Siegle, D., Ottone-Cross, K., McCoach, D. B., Langley, S. D., Callahan, C. M., Brodersen, A. V., & Caughey, M. (2021). Identifying and serving gifted and talented students: Are identification and services connected? Gifted Child Quarterly, 65, pp. 115–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220988308
• Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64, 1316–1325. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.18376
• Han, K. S. (2017). Why & how we apply PBL to science-gifted education? Creative Education, 8, 912-924. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.86066
• Heilbronner, N. N., & Renzulli, J. S. (2016). Developing Blended Knowledge in Science using the enrichment triad; Practical applications of an enquiry-based learning model. In K. S. Taber & M. Sumida (Eds.), International perspectives on science education for the gifted; key issues and challenges (pp.72-83). Routledge.
• Hernández-Torrano, D., & Kuzhabekova, A. (2020). The state and development of research in the field of gifted education over 60 years: A bibliometric study of four gifted education journals (1957–2017). High Ability Studies, 31, 133-155, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2019.1601071
• Johnsen, S. K. (2012). Standards in gifted education and their effects on professional competence. Gifted Child Today, 35, 49-57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217511427430
• Kaplan, S. N. (2009). Myth 9: There is a single curriculum for the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 257-258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346934
• Kaplan, S. N. (2012). Alternative routes to teacher preparation. Gifted education and the political scene. Gifted Child Today, 35, 37-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217511427510
• Kaplan, S. N., McComas, W. F., & Manzone, J. A. (2016). Teaching science and gifted students; using depth, complexity and authentic enquiry in the discipline. In K. S. Taber & M. Sumida (Eds.), International perspectives on science education for the gifted; key issues and challenges (pp.27-42). Routledge.
• Kidman, G. (2016). Extending the gifted science student; what the teacher needs to do during enquiry-based teaching. In K. S. Taber & M. Sumida (Eds.), International perspectives on science education for the gifted; key issues and challenges (pp.154-165). Routledge.
• Kim, M. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216630607
• Koniceck-Moran, R., & Keeley, P. (2015). Teaching for conceptual understanding in science. NSTA Press. Laine, S., Kuusisto, E., & Tirri, K. (2016). Finnish teachers' conceptions of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39, 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216640936
• Laine, S., & Tirri, K. (2016) How Finnish elementary school teachers meet the needs of their gifted students, High Ability Studies, 27, 149-164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1108185 Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Sense Publishers.
• Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 370–391. doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20007
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95-132). Kluwer. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Design qualitative research. Sage.
• Marulcu, I., & Barnett, M. (2013). Fifth graders’ learning about simple machines through engineering design-based instruction using LEGO materials. Research in Science Education, 43, 1825–1850. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9335-9
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Ministry of National Education (2006). Ortaokul 6.,7. ve 8. Sınıf fen bilimleri öğretim programı [Middle school 6th, 7th, and 8th grades science and technology curriculum]. National Ministry of Education Publications.
• National Association for Gifted Children & Council for Exceptional Children (2013). Teacher preparation standards in gifted and talented education. Retrieved March 1, 2024, from https://cdn.ymaws.com/nagc.org/resource/resmgr/knowledge-center/nagc-_cec_caep_standards__20.pdf
• Newman, J. L., & Hubner, J. P. (2012). Designing challenging science experiences for high-ability learners through partnerships with university professors. Gifted Child Today, 35, 103-115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217511436093
• Öztuna Kaplan, A. (2019). Kuvvet ve hareket. In C. Laçin Şimşek (Ed), Fen öğretiminde kavram yanılgılarının tespiti ve giderilmesi (pp. 147-189). Pegem Akademi: Ankara.
• Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2009). The translation of teachers' understanding of gifted students into instructional strategies for teaching science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 333–351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9138-7
• Park, S., & Suh, J. K. (2019). The PCK map approach to capturing the complexity of enacted pck (ePCK) and pedagogical reasoning in science teaching. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Teachers' Knowledge for Teaching Science, (pp.185–200). Springer. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
• Pfeiffer, S., & Shaughnessy, M. F. (2015). A reflective conversation with Steven Pfeiffer: Serving the gifted. Gifted Education International, 31, 25–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429413486860
• Ramnarain, U., & Schuster, D. (2014). The pedagogical orientations of South African physical sciences teachers towards inquiry or direct instructional approaches. Res Sci Educ, 44, 627–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9395-5
• Reis-Jorge, J., Ferreira, M., Olcina-Sempere, G., & Marques, B. (2021). Perceptions of giftedness and classroom practice with gifted children – an exploratory study of primary school teachers. Qualitative Research in Education, 10, 291-315. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/qre.8097
• Renzulli, J.S. (1999). What is this thing called giftedness, and how do we develop it? A twenty-five-year perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 3-54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329902300102
• Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 150-159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212444901
• Renzulli, J. (2021). The major goals of gifted education and talent development programs. Academia Letters, Article 2585. doi: https://doi.org/10.20935/AL2585.
• Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2018). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental approach for promoting creative productivity in young people. In S. I.
• Pfeiffer, E. Schaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.). APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 163–184). Washington DC: APA.
• Rosemarin, S. (2014). Should the teacher of the gifted be gifted? Gifted Education International, 30(3), 263-270. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429413486577
• Sękowski, A. E., & Łubianka, B. (2015). Education of gifted students in Europe. Gifted Education International, 31, 73–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429413486579
• Shaughnessy, M. F., & Sak, U. (2015). A reflective conversation with Ugur Sak: Gifted education in Turkey. Gifted Education International, 31, 54–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429413510639
• Shaughnessy, M.F., & Senior, J. (2022). Teachers of gifted children: the essential core competencies. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 9(2), 219-225.
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching, Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and training: Foundations of the new reform. Hardward Educational Review, 57, 1-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
• Stargardter, J., Laine, S., & Tirri, K. (2023). Non-native gifted students in a Finnish teacher training school: A case study. Educ. Sci. 13, 659. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070659
• Sternberg, R. J. (2019). Teaching and assessing gifted students in STEM disciplines through the augmented theory of successful intelligence. High Ability Studies, 30, 103-126, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2018.1528847
• Sternberg, R. J., Ehsan, H., & Ghahremani, M. (2022). Levels of Teaching Science to Gifted Students. Roeper Review, 44, 198-211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2115178
• Stollman, S., Meirink, J., Westenberg, M., & van Driel, J. (2021). Teachers’ interactive cognitions of differentiated instruction: An exploration in regular and talent development lessons. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 44, 201-222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532211001440
• Stott, A., & Hobden, P. A. (2016). Effective learning: A case study of the learning strategies used by a gifted high achiever in learning science. Gifted Child Quarterly 60, 63–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215611961
• Subaşı, M. (2021). Ideal science teacher from perspective of gifted students: phenomenologicial study. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 10, 613-625. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/buefad.767783
• Şahin, F., & Levent, F. (2015). Examining the methods and strategies which classroom teachers use in the education of gifted students. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 5, 73-82.
• Taber, K. S. (2016). Giftedness, intelligence, creativity, and the construction of knowledge in the science classroom. In K. S. Taber & M. Sumida, (Eds.), International perspectives on science education for the gifted. Key issues and challenges, (pp. 1-12). Routledge.
• Taber, K. S., & Sumida, M. (Eds.). (2016). International perspectives on science education for the gifted; key issues and challenges. Routledge.
• Thomson, M. (2006). Supporting gifted and talented pupils in the secondary school. Sage Publications. Tirri, K. (2017). Teacher education is the key to changing the identification and teaching of the gifted, Roeper Review, 39, 210-212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1318996
• Tirri, K., & Laine, S. (2017). Teacher education in inclusive education. In The Sage Handbook of Research on Teacher Education; D. J. Clandin & J. Husu, (Eds.), (pp. 761–775). Publications Ltd.: Thousand Oaks.
• Ülger, B. B., & Çepni, S. (2020). Evaluating the effect of differentiated inquiry-based science lesson modules on gifted students' scientific process skills. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 10, 1289-1324. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2020.039
• VanTassel-Baska, J. (2021). Curriculum in gifted education: The core of the enterprise. Gifted Child Today, 44, 44-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217520940747
• VanTassel-Baska, J., Hubbard, G. F., & Robbins, J. I. (2020). Differentiation of instruction for gifted learners: Collated evaluative studies of teacher classroom practices. Roeper Review, 42, 153-164, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1765919
• Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (3rd Ed.) (WISC-III). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
• World Council for Gifted and Talented Children. (2021). Global principles for professional learning in gifted education. Retrieved March 1, 2024, from https://world-gifted.org/professional-learning-global-principles.pdf Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Sage.