OPTIMIZATION OF 3D PRINTING PARAMETERS FOR PLA/PCL FILAMENT USING THE TAGUCHI METHOD: EFFECTS ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES AND SHAPE MEMORY PERFORMANCE

Abstract

This study investigates the optimization of 3D printing process parameters for PLA/PCL filament using the Taguchi method. A Taguchi L9 orthogonal array design was employed to explore the effects of print speed (40, 60, 80 mm/s), temperature (185,190,200°C), and infill pattern (the Lines, Gyroid, Triangle) on both mechanical and shape memory properties of the printed parts. The experiments were conducted using a Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D printer. The mechanical properties, including tensile strength, and shape memory properties such as shape recovery ratio, were evaluated for each combination of process parameters. The experiments revealed that a print speed of 40 mm/s, a nozzle temperature of 185°C, and the Lines infill pattern produced the best shape memory performance, achieving the shape recovery rate of 78.60% and the recovery time of 69 seconds. For tensile strength, the optimal conditions were found to be 40 mm/s, 185°C, and the Gyroid infill pattern, resulting in the highest tensile strength of 21.985 MPa. However, for simplicity and faster production, the Lines infill pattern is preferred. This research provides valuable insights for optimizing the 3D printing process of PLA/PCL filament and enhancing its mechanical and shape memory performance, which is crucial for various applications in biomedical, textile, and packaging industries.

Keywords

• 3D Printing
• Mechanical Properties
• PLA/PCL Filament
• Shape Memory Properties
• Taguchi Method

References

1. O. Öztürk, M. A. Şen, and M. Aydın, “The influence of fused filament fabrication parameters on the fracture behavior of PLA specimens considering energy consumption,” Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 451–464, 2024.
2. S. Solechan, A. Suprihanto, S.A. Widyanto, J. Triyono, D. F. itriyana, J. P. Siregar, and T. Cionita, “Investigating the effect of PCL concentrations on the characterization of PLA polymeric blends for biomaterial applications,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 20, Art. no. 7396, 2022.
3. T. C. Mokhena, M. B. Chabalala, S. Mapukata, A. Mtibe, L. Hlekelele, Z. Cele, and K. Shingange. “Electrospun PCL‐based materials for health‐care applications: an overview,” Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, vol. 309, no. 8. Art. no. 2300388, 2024.
4. T. Patrício, M. Domingos, A. Gloria, U. D'Amora, J.F. Coelho, and P.J. Bártolo, “Fabrication and characterisation of PCL and PCL/PLA scaffolds for tissue engineering,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 145-156, 2014.
5. A. Alafaghani and A. Qattawi, “Investigating the effect of fused deposition modeling processing parameters using Taguchi design of experiment method,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 36, Dec., pp. 164-174, 2018.
6. H. Hasdiansah, R. I. Yaqin, P. Pristiansyah, M. L. Umar, and B. H. Priyambodo, “FDM-3D printing parameter optimization using taguchi approach on surface roughness of thermoplastic polyurethane parts,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 3011-3024, 2023.
7. S. Singh, R.K. Attri, and S. Trivedi, “Optimization of FDM 3D printing process parameters for improving wear characteristics of PLA-nGr composite using taguchi DOE”. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Oct., pp. 1-9. 2024.
8. Y. Meyva‐Zeybek and C. Kaynak, “Electrospinning of PLA and PLA/POSS nanofibers: use of taguchi optimization for process parameters,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 138, no.3, Art. no. 49685, 2021.

9. A. Nazir, N. Khenoussi, L. Schacher, T. Hussain, D. Adolphe, and A.H. Hekmati, “Using the taguchi method to investigate the effect of different parameters on mean diameter and variation in PA-6 nanofibres produced by needleless electrospinning,” RSC Advances, vol. 5, no.94, pp. 76892-76897, 2015.
10. A. Dey and N. Yodo, “A systematic survey of FDM process parameter optimization and their influence on part characteristics,” Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, vol. 3, no. 3, Art. no. 64, 2019.
11. O.A. Mohamed, S.H. Masood, and J.L. Bhowmik, “Mathematical modeling and FDM process parameters optimization using response surface methodology based on Q-optimal design,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 40, no. 23-24, pp. 10052–10073, 2016.
12. N. Vidakis, C. David, M. Petousis, D. Sagris, N. Mountakis, and A. Moutsopoulou, “The effect of six key process control parameters on the surface roughness, dimensional accuracy, and porosity in material extrusion 3D printing of polylactic acid: prediction models and optimization supported by robust design analysis,” Advances in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, vol. 5, Nov., Art. no. 100104, 2022.
13. L. Le, M. A. Rabsatt, H. Eisazadeh, and M. Torabizadeh, “Reducing print time while minimizing loss in mechanical properties in consumer FDM parts,” International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 197-212, 2022.
14. H. Liu, H. He, and B. Huang, “Favorable thermoresponsive shape memory effects of 3D printed poly (lactic acid)/poly (ε‐caprolactone) blends fabricated by fused deposition modeling”. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, vol. 305, no. 11, Art. no. 2000295, 2020.
15. H. M. Qiu, K. W. Hou, J. P. Zhou, W. J. Liu, J. B. Wen, and Q. F. Gu, “Preparation of biodegradable PLA/PCL composite filaments: effect of PLA content on strength,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 770, no. 1, Art. no. 012059, 2020.
16. K. Saptaji, C. O. Rochmad, O. A. Juniasih, G. K. Sunnardianto, F. Triawan, A. I. Ramadhan, and A. Azhari, “Enhancing shape-recovery ratio of 4D printed polylactic acid (PLA) structures through processing parameter optimization,” Progress in Additive Manufacturing, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1869-1881, 2024.
17. M. Hosseinzadeh, M. Ghoreishi, and K. Narooei, “An investigation into the effect of thermal variables on the 3D printed shape memory polymer structures with different geometries,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 715-726, 2022.
18. M. Eryildiz, “Influence of process parameters on the shape recovery properties of 4D-printed polylactic acid parts produced by fused deposition modeling,” Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 4258-4269, 2023.
19. P. Kumar, P. B. Barua, J. L. Gaindhar, “Quality optimization (multi‐characteristics) through Taguchi's technique and utility concept,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 475-485, 2000.
20. D. Syrlybayev, B. Zharylkassyn, A. Seisekulova, M. Akhmetov, A. Perveen, and D. Talamona, “Optimisation of strength properties of FDM printed parts—A critical review,” Polymers, vol. 13, no. 10, Art. no. 1587, 2021.
21. T. Liu, L. Liu, C. Zeng, Y. Liu, and J. Leng, “4D printed anisotropic structures with tailored mechanical behaviors and shape memory effects,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 186, Jan., Art. no. 107935, 2020.
22. J. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. Song, L. Ren, Q. Liu, and L. Ren, “Programming multistage shape memory and variable recovery force with 4D printing parameters,” Advanced Materials Technologies, vol. 4, no. 11, Art. no. 1900535, 2019.
23. Y. S. Alshebly, and M. Nafea, “Effects of printing parameters on 4D-printed PLA actuators,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 32, no. 6, Art. no. 064008, 2023.
24. D. Kong, A. Guo, H. Wu, X. Li, J. Wu, Y. Hu, and S. Guo, “Four-dimensional printing of polymer-derived ceramics with high-resolution, reconfigurability, and shape memory effects,” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 83, Mar., Art. no. 104050, 2024.
25. S. Ma, Z. Jiang, M. Wang, L. Zhang, Y. Liang, Z. Zhang, and L. Ren, “4D printing of PLA/PCL shape memory composites with controllable sequential deformation,” Bio-Design and Manufacturing, vol. 4, Jul., pp. 867-878, 2021.
26. P. Kiani, M. Sedighi, M. Kasaeian-Naeini, and A. H. Jabbari, “High cycle fatigue behavior and thermal properties of PLA/PCL blends produced by fused deposition modeling,” Journal of Polymer Research, vol. 30, no. 7, Art. no. 264, 2023.
27. C. Hamzaçebi, P. Li, P.A.P. Pereira, and H. Navas, “Taguchi method as a robust design tool. Quality Control-Intelligent Manufacturing,” in Quality Control - Intelligent Manufacturing, Robust Design and Charts, P. Li, P. A. R. Pereira, and H. Navas, Eds. London: IntechOpen, Mar., pp. 1-19, 2020.
28. S. H. Ahn, M. Montero, D. Odell, S. Roundy, and P. K. Wright, “Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS,” Rapid prototyping journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 248-257, 2002.
29. M. Domingo-Espin, J. M. Puigoriol-Forcada, A. A. Garcia-Granada, J. Llumà, S. Borros, and G. Reyes, “Mechanical property characterization and simulation of fused deposition modeling polycarbonate parts,” Materials & Design, vol. 83, Oct., pp. 670-677, 2015.
30. A. Li, X. G. Chen, L. Y. Zhang, and Y. F. Zhang, “Temperature and infill density effects on thermal, mechanical and shape memory properties of polylactic acid/poly (ε-caprolactone) blends for 4d printing,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 24, Art. No. 8838, 2022.
31. P. K. Mishra, P. Senthil, S. Adarsh, M. S. Anoop, “An investigation to study the combined effect of different infill pattern and infill density on the impact strength of 3D printed polylactic acid parts,” Composites Communications, vol. 24, Apr., Art. No. 100605, 2021.
32. T. S. Tamir, G. Xiong, Q. Fang, X. Dong, Z. Shen, and F. Y. Wang, “A feedback-based print quality improving strategy for FDM 3D printing: an optimal design approach,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 2777-2791, 2022.
33. A. R. Avdeev, A. A. Shvets, and I. S. Torubarov, “Investigation of kinematics of 3D printer print head moving systems,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICIE 2019), vol. I5, Dec., pp. 461-471, 2020.
34. G. Chouhan and G. Bala Murali, “Designs, advancements, and applications of three-dimensional printed gyroid structures: A review,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, vol. 238, no. 2, pp. 965-987, 2024.
35. A. H. Kadhum, S. Al-Zubaidi, and S. S. Abdulkareem, “Effect of the infill patterns on the mechanical and surface characteristics of 3D printing of PLA, PLA+ and PETG materials,” ChemEngineering, vol. 7, no. 3, Art. no. 46, 2023.
36. M. T. Birosz, D. Ledenyak, and M. Ando, “Effect of FDM infill patterns on mechanical properties”. Polymer Testing, vol. 113, Sep., Art. no. 107654, 2022.
37. M. F. Jasim, T. F. Abbas, and A. F. Huayier, “The effect of infill pattern on tensile strength of PLA material in fused deposition modeling (FDM) process,” Engineering and Technology Journal, vol. 40, no. 21, pp. 1723-1730, 2022.
38. A. Chalgham, A. Ehrmann, I. Wickenkamp, “Mechanical properties of FDM printed PLA parts before and after thermal treatment,” Polymers, vol. 13, no. 8, Art. no. 1239, 2021.
39. H. G. Şahin and A. Mardani, “Mechanical properties, durability performance and interlayer adhesion of 3DPC mixtures: a state‐of‐the‐art review,” Structural Concrete, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 5481-5505, 2023.
40. Y. Weng, M. Li, D. Zhang, M. Tan, and S. Qian, “Investigation of interlayer adhesion of 3D printable cementitious material from the aspect of printing process,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 143, May., Art. no. 106386, 2021.
41. T. Yang and C. Yeh, “Morphology and mechanical properties of 3D printed wood fiber/polylactic acid composite parts using fused deposition modeling (FDM): the effects of printing speed,” Polymers, vol. 12, no. 6, Art. no. 1334, 2020.
42. S. Mani and R. Khare, “Effect of chain flexibility and interlayer interactions on the local dynamics of layered polymer systems,” Macromolecules, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 576-588, 2018.
43. J. Yoon, H. Jin, I. Chin, C. Kim, and M. Kim, “Theoretical prediction of weight loss and molecular weight during random chain scission degradation of polymers,” Polymer, vol. 38, no. 14, pp. 3573-3579, 1997.
44. Y. Lyu, H. Zhao, X. Wen, L. Lin, A. Schlarb, and X. Shi, “Optimization of 3D printing parameters for high‐performance biodegradable materials,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 138, no. 32, Art. no. 50782, 2021.
45. K. Elhattab, S. Bhaduri, and P. Sikder, “Influence of fused deposition modelling nozzle temperature on the rheology and mechanical properties of 3D printed β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP)/polylactic acid (PLA) composite,” Polymers, vol. 14, no. 6, Art. no. 1222, 2022.
46. Z. Issabayeva and I. Shishkovsky, “Prediction of the mechanical behavior of polylactic acid parts with shape memory effect fabricated by FDM,” Polymers, vol. 15, no. 5, Art. no. 1162, 2023.
47. M. Barletta, A. Gisario, and M. Mehrpouya, “4D printing of shape memory polylactic acid (PLA) components: investigating the role of the operational parameters in fused deposition modelling (FDM),” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 61, Jan., pp. 473-480, 2021.
48. S. J. Zhen, “The effect of chain flexibility and chain mobility on radiation crosslinking of polymers,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 60, no. 4-5, pp. 445-451, 2001.
49. B. Aloyaydi, S. Sivasankaran, and A. Mustafa, “Investigation of infill-patterns on mechanical response of 3D printed poly-lactic-acid,” Polymer Testing, vol. 87, Jul., Art. no. 106557, 2020.
50. M. Othmani, K. Zarbane, and A. Chouaf, “Effect of infill and density pattern on the mechanical behaviour of ABS parts manufactured by FDM using Taguchi and ANOVA approach,” Archives of Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 66-77, 2021.