Diyaliz Kateter Uygulamasında Youtube Videolarının Eğitimsel Değeri

Abstract

Amaç: Youtube, en popüler video paylaşım sitelerinden biridir ve sağlık bilgilerini yaymak için güçlü bir araç olabilir. Medikal alanda Youtube videolarının sayısı ve kullanımı giderek artmakta olup bu nedenle eğitici değerini araştırma ihtiyacı doğmuştur. Diyaliz kateter uygulama videolarının özelliklerini, kullanışlılığını ve bilimsel doğruluğunu inceledik. Yöntemler: Nisan 2022'de İngilizce dilinde herhangi bir filtre seçmeden "diyaliz kateteri" anahtar kelimeleri ile Youtube araması yaptık. Videoların içeriği, video kaynakları, videoda bahsedilen kateter tipi, animasyon varlığı ve bilgilerin doğruluğu değerlendirildi. Doğruluğun gücünü netleştirmek için mDISCERN skoru da belirlendi. Bulgular: Değerlendirme, doğru bilgi içeren video sayısının 171 (%83,4) olduğunu ve mDISCERN puanının (2,85±0,59) anlamlı derecede yüksek olduğunu gösterdi. Hedeflenen videolar arasında sağlık çalışanları ve resmi kurum tarafından yüklenen videoların mDISCERN puanı anlamlı olarak daha yüksek çıktı. Ortalama kullanışlılık puanı 1,96±0,23 idi ve kaynaklar arasında anlamlı bir fark yoktu. Sonuç: Eğitim ve güvenilirlik açısından seçilen videoların "YouTube Tıp Eğitimi" gibi bir alt başlık altında tıp profesyonellerinin kullanımına sunulması daha uygun olacaktır.

Keywords

• Hemodiyaliz
• Kateter
• Youtube
• İnternet
• Sosyal medya

Educational Value of Youtube Videos in Dialysis Catheter Application

Abstract

Objective: Youtube is one of the most popular video-sharing websites and can be a powerful tool for disseminating health information. The number and use of Youtube videos in the medical field is increasing, so there is a need to research its educational value. We examined dialysis catheter application videos' characteristics, usefulness, and scientific accuracy. Methods: We performed a Youtube search with the keywords of "dialysis catheter" without selecting any filter in the English language in April 2022. The content of the videos, video sources, type of catheter mentioned in the video, presence of animation, and the accuracy of the information was evaluated. mDISCERN score was also determined to clarify the power of the accuracy. Results: The evaluation showed that the number of videos with accurate information was 171 (83.4%) with a significantly higher mDISCERN score (2.85±0.59). Among the targeted videos, the mDISCERN score of the videos uploaded by healthcare professionals and the official institution was significantly higher. The average usefulness score was 1.96±0.23, and there was no significant difference between the sources. Conclusions: It would be more appropriate to present the videos selected in terms of education and reliability under a sub-title such as "YouTube Medical Education" for use by medical professionals.

Keywords

• Hemodialysis
• Catheter
• Youtube
• Internet
• Social media

References

1. 1. Murea M, Geary RL, Davis RP, Moossavi S. Vascular access for hemodialysis: A perpetual challenge. Semin Dial. 2019;32(6):527-34.
2. 2. Johansen KL, Chertow GM, Gilbertson DT, Herzog CA, Ishani A, Israni AK, et al. US Renal Data System 2021 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2022;79(4 Suppl 1): A8-A12.
3. 3. Fisher M, Golestaneh L, Allon M, Abreo K, Mokrzycki MH. Prevention of Bloodstream Infections in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;15(1):132-51.
4. 4. Jiang HY, Huang DJ, Bai YH, Li JS, Pi HY, Chen J, et al. Prognostic factors in patients undergoing early-start peritoneal dialysis within 24 h after catheter insertion. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2019;52(3):e8055.
5. 5. McCartan D, Gray R, Harty J, Blake G. Tenckhoff Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion in a Northern Ireland District General Hospital. Ulster Med J. 2015;84(3):166-70.
6. 6. Al-Hwiesh AK. Percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion by a nephrologist: a new, simple, and safe technique. Perit Dial Int. 2014;34(2):204-11.
7. 7. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015;21(3):173-94.
8. 8. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis – a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012; 39:899–903.

9. 9. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105–11.
10. 10. Lee JS, Seo HS, Hong TH. YouTube as a source of patient information on gallstone disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(14):4066-70.
11. 11. Ching T, Roake JA and Lewis DR. Net-based information on varicose vein treatments: a tangled web. N Z Med J 2010;123:9–15.
12. 12. Güneş T, Serinken M, Alur İ, Beydilli H, Karcioglu O, Eken C. YouTube as a source of information on varicose veins. Phlebology. 2016;31(7):501-5.
13. 13. Lee KN, Son GH, Park SH, Kim Y, Park ST. YouTube as a Source of Information and Education on Hysterectomy. J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35(25):e196.
14. 14. Trerotola SO. Hemodialysis catheter placement and management. Radiology. 2000;215(3):651-8.
15. 15. Crabtree JH, Chow KM. Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion. Semin Nephrol. 2017;37(1):17-29.
16. 16. Farag M, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N. Use of YouTube as a Resource for Surgical Education-Clarity or Confusion. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(3):445-49.
17. 17. Yaylaci S, Serinken M, Eken C, Karcioglu O, Yilmaz A, Elicabuk H, et al. Are YouTube videos accurate and reliable on basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Emerg Med Australas. 2014;26(5):474-7.
18. 18. Elsevier: What is Procedures Consult?; [cited 2023 March 1]. Available from: https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/12499/supporthub/ckjapan/