Minör kafa travmalı pediatrik hastalarda PECARN algoritmasının retrospektif incelenmesi.

Abstract

Amaç: Pediatrik kafa travması olgularını nörolojik ve klinik durumları ışığında PECARN'a göre retrospektif olarak değerlendirmeyi ve incelemeyi amaçladık. Radyasyona bağlı karsinogenezi önlemek için minimum BT görüntüleme oranlarıyla TBI tespitine katkıda bulunmak istedik. Method: Minör kafa travması nedeniyle acil servise başvuran ve beyin cerrahi kliniğine başvuran 108 çocuk hasta retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Takip sırasında 9 hastanın yoğun bakıma ihtiyacı oldu ve 5 hastaya beyin cerrahisi ameliyatı uygulandı. En sık görülen travma etiyolojisi %53,7 ile kendi seviyesinden düşmeydi. En sık görülen tomografi patolojisi deplase olmayan kırıktı. PECARN algoritmasına göre yapılan değerlendirmelere göre 18 olguya (%16,7) BT önerildi; 32 olguya BT önerilmedi. Sonuç: Klinisyenin amacı, radyasyonun olumsuz etkilerinden korunmak için gereksiz BT görüntülemeden kaçınarak, klinik açıdan anlamlı TBI'yı hızlı ve doğru bir şekilde teşhis etmektir. Bu amaçla PECARN algoritmasını kullanmanızı öneririz.

Keywords

• kafa travması
• karsinogenez
• tomografi

Retrospective examination of the PECARN algorithm in pediatric patients with minor head trauma

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to retrospectively evaluate and examine pediatric head trauma cases according to PECARN in the light of their neurological and clinical conditions. We wanted to contribute to the detection of TBI with minimum CT imaging rates in order to avoid radiation-related carcinogenesis. Method: 108 pediatric patients who were admitted to the emergency department due to minor head trauma and were admitted to the neurosurgery clinic were evaluated retrospectively. Result: During follow-up, 9 patients required intensive care and 5 patients underwent neurosurgical surgery. The most common trauma etiology was falling from one's own level with 53.7%. The most common tomography pathology was non-displaced fracture. According to the evaluations made in accordance with the PECARN algorithm, CT was recommended in 18 cases (16.7%); CT was not recommended for 32 cases. Conclusion: The clinician's goal is to quickly and accurately diagnose clinically significant TBI while avoiding unnecessary CT imaging to protect against the adverse effects of radiation. We recommend using the PECARN algorithm for this purpose.

Keywords

• head trauma
• carcinogenesis
• tomography

References

1. 1.. Nigrovic LE, Kuppermann N. Children With Minor Blunt Head Trauma Presenting to the Emergency Department. Pediatrics. 2019;144(6).
2. 2. Pinto PS, Meoded A, Poretti A, Tekes A, Huisman TA. The unique features of traumatic brain injury in children. review of the characteristics of the pediatric skull and brain, mechanisms of trauma, patterns of injury, complications, and their imaging findings--part 2. J Neuroimaging. 2012;22(2):e18-41.
3. 3. Singh N, Singhal A. Challenges in minor TBI and indications for head CT in pediatric TBI-an update. Childs Nerv Syst. 2017;33(10):1677-81.
4. 4. Lumba-Brown A, Yeates KO, Sarmiento K, Breiding MJ, Haegerich TM, Giogia GA, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline on the Diagnosis and Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Among Children. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(11):e182853.
5. 5. Mayer AR, Quinn DK, Master CL. The spectrum of mild traumatic brain injury: A review. Neurology. 2017;89(6):623-32.
6. 6. Özsaraç M, Karcıoğlu Ö, Topaçoğlu H, Ayrık C, Kıyan S, Sener S, et al. Clinical indicators of traumatic brain injury and skull fracture in pediatric head trauma patients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2009;9(4):153-8.
7. 7. Babl FE, Borland ML, Phillips N, Kochar A, Dalton S, McCaskill M, et al. Accuracy of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE head injury decision rules in children: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2017;389(10087):2393-402. 8. Atabaki SM. Pediatric head injury. Pediatr Rev. 2007;28(6):215-24.
8. 9. Karaoğlu Gündoğdu D, Şahinoğlu M, Köktekir E, Karabağlı H. Pediatric Head Injuries. Türk Nöroşir Derg. 2020;30(2):287-92.

9. 10. Dunning J, Daly JP, Lomas JP, Lecky F, Batchelor J, Mackway-Jones K. Derivation of the children's head injury algorithm for the prediction of important clinical events decision rule for head injury in children. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91(11):885-91.
10. 11. Klemetti S, Uhari M, Pokka T, Rantala H. Evaluation of decision rules for identifying serious consequences of traumatic head injuries in pediatric patients. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009;25(12):811-5.
11. 12. Er A, Akman C, Alataş İ, Ünlü HB, Ceylan I, Gün C, et al. Should Children with Minor Head Injury Routinely Have CT Scan?. JOPP Derg. 2013;5(3):131-135.
12. 13. Lyttle MD, Crowe L, Oakley E, Dunning J, Babl FE. Comparing CATCH, CHALICE and PECARN clinical decision rules for paediatric head injuries. Emerg Med J. 2012;29(10):785-94.
13. 14. Tomar Güneysu S, Derinöz Güleryüz O. Çocuklarda Minör Kafa Travmalarına Yaklaşım. 2022.
14. 15. Osmond MH, Klassen TP, Wells GA, Correll R, Jarvis A, Joubert G, et al. CATCH: a clinical decision rule for the use of computed tomography in children with minor head injury. CMAJ. 2010;182(4):341-8.
15. 16. Bressan S, Eapen N, Phillips N, Gilhotra Y, Kochar A, Dalton S, et al. PECARN algorithms for minor head trauma: Risk stratification estimates from a prospective PREDICT cohort study. Acad Emerg Med. 2021;28(10):1124-33.
16. 17. Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS, Hoyle JD, Atabaki SM, Holubkov R, et al. Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2009;374(9696):1160-70.
17. 18. McGraw M, Way T. Comparison of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE clinical decision rules for pediatric head injury in the emergency department. CJEM. 2019;21(1):120-4.
18. 19. Schutzman SA, Greenes DS. Pediatric minor head trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37(1):65-74.
19. 20. Easter JS, Bakes K, Dhaliwal J, Miller M, Caruso E, Haukoos JS. Comparison of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE rules for children with minor head injury: a prospective cohort study. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64(2):145-52, 52 e1-5.
20. 21. Furtado LMF, da Costa Val Filho JA, Dos Santos AR, Furfuro R, Sandes BL, Hon Y, et al. Pediatric minor head trauma in Brazil and external validation of PECARN rules with a cost-effectiveness analysis. Brain Inj. 2020;34(11):1467-71.
21. 22. Michiwaki Y, Maehara N, Ren N, Kawano Y, Nagaoka S, Maeda K, et al. Indications for computed tomography use and frequency of traumatic abnormalities based on real-world data of 2405 pediatric patients with minor head trauma. Surg Neurol Int. 2021;12:321.
22. 23. Andrade FP, Montoro RN, Oliveira R, Loures G, Flessak L, Gross R, et al. Pediatric minor head trauma: do cranial CT scans change the therapeutic approach? Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2016;71(10):606-10.
23. 24. Fundaro C, Caldarelli M, Monaco S, Cota F, Giorgio V, Filoni S, et al. Brain CT scan for pediatric minor accidental head injury. An Italian experience and review of literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012;28(7):1063-8.
24. 25. Cicogna A, Minca G, Posocco F, Corno F, Basile C, Dalt LD, et al. Non-ionizing Imaging for the Emergency Department Assessment of Pediatric Minor Head Trauma. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:881461.