Kranial Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Videolarını Değerlendirmek İçin Akıllı Telefon Kullanma: Gözlemciler Arası Çalışma

Year 2022, Volume: 14 Issue: 2, 337 - 343, 29.06.2022

İbrahim Feyyaz Naldemir , Ahmet Kürşat Karaman , Mustafa Boğan , Hasan Baki Altınsoy , Mehmet Karadağ

https://doi.org/10.18521/ktd.1080194

Abstract

Amaç: Birçok klinisyen akıllı telefonlarından Beyin Bilgisayarlı Tomografi (BBT) görüntüleri veya videoları ile hasta değerlendirmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, akıllı telefon aracılığıyla paylaşılan BBT videolarının tanıda güvenilirliğini değerlendirmektir.
Metod: WhatsApp üzerinden gönderilen BBT videoları 9 bölgeye ayrılarak değerlendirildi: yumuşak doku, kemik yapısı, parankim, ventrikül, damar yapıları, orta kulak, orbita, sinüsler ve ekstra aksiyel alan.
Bulgular: BBT videoları 9 bölümde incelendi; bu bölümlerden birinde uzmanlar arasında mükemmel uyum, 6'sında iyi uyum, 2'sinde zayıf uyum vardı. Altın standart ile karşılaştırıldığında, 9 bölümden 5'inin altın standardına alternatif olabileceği gösterildi.
Sonuç: BBT videolarının değerlendirilmesinin ucuz, hızlı ve yaygın bir uygulama olan WhatsApp gibi mesajlaşma uygulamaları ile sağlanabileceği düşünülebilir. Ancak bu çalışma, bir messenger uygulaması tarafından akıllı telefon üzerinden paylaşılan tanısal görüntü ve videoların standart değerlendirmelere alternatif olamayacağını göstermektedir.

Keywords

Whatsapp, Çok kesitli bilgisayarlı tomografi, Video kayıt, Akıllı telefon

Using Smartphone to Evaluate Cranial Computed Tomography Videos: An Inter-Observer Study

Abstract

Objective: Many clinicians receive Cranial Computed Tomography (CCT) images or videos by their smartphone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the CCT videos that are shared through smartphone in the diagnosis.
Method: The CCT videos that were sent via WhatsApp were examined in 9 sections: soft tissue, bone structure, parenchyma, ventricle, vascular structures, middle ear, orbits, sinuses and the extra axial space.
Result: The CCT videos were analyzed in 9 sections; there was a perfect agreement among specialists in one of these sections, good agreement in 6 and poor agreement in 2. When compared with the gold standard, it was shown that 5 out of 9 sections could be an alternative to the gold standard.
Conclusion: It may be thought that evaluation of the CCT videos can be obtained with messenger applications such as WhatsApp, which is a cheap, fast and common application. But this study shows that diagnostic images and videos shared through the smartphone by a messenger application can not be an alternative to standard evaluations.

Keywords

whatsapp, Multidedector Computed Tomography, Video Recording, Smartphone

References

• 1. Yıldız ÖÖ, Eraybar S, Kaya H, et al. Acil serviste yapılan bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntüleme istemleri ne kadar etkin?  J Contemp Med 2019; 9: 249-54
• 2. Gulacti U, Lok U, Hatipoglu S, et al. An analysis of WhatsApp usage for communication between consulting and emergency physicians.  J Med Syst 2016; 40: 130.
• 3. Handelman GS, Rogers AC, Babiker Z, et al. Media messaging in diagnosis of acute CXR pathology: an interobserver study among residents.  Intern Emerg Med 2018; 13: 1257-1263.
• 4. Giordano V, Koch HA, Mendes CH, et al. WhatsApp Messenger is useful and reproducible in the assessment of tibial plateau fractures: inter-and intra-observer agreement study.  Int J Med Inform 2015; 84: 141-148.
• 5. Alper R. Uygulamalı İstatistik ve Geçerlik-Güvenirlik. Detay Yay: Ankara 2010: 350
• 6. Goost H, Witten J, Heck A, et al. Image and diagnosis quality of X-ray image transmission via cell phone camera: a project study evaluating quality and reliability. PLoS One 7 2012: e43402
• 7. Prakash AK, Kotalwar SG, Datta B, et al. To evaluate the inter and intraobserver agreement in the initial diagnosis by digital chest radiograph sent via whatsapp messenger. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: PA4820
• 8. Sevenoaks H, Houghton N, Mehta, J. Sharing CT images via smartphone video. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2016; 98: 232-233.
• 9. Ramdurg P, Naveen S, Mendigeri V, et al. Smart app for smart diagnosis: Whatsapp a bliss for oral physician and radiologist. J Oral Med Oral Surg Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016; 2: 219-225.
• 10. Petruzzi M, De Benedittis, M. WhatsApp: a telemedicine platform for facilitating remote oral medicine consultation and improving clinical examinations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016; 121: 248-254.
• 11. Graziano F, Maugeri R, Iacopino DG. Telemedicine versus WhatsApp: from tradition to evolution. Neuroreport 2015; 26: 602-603.
• 12. Koparal M, Ünsal HY, Alan H, et al. WhatsApp messaging improves communication in an oral and maxillofacial surgery team. Int J Med Inform 2019; 132: 103987.
• 13. Sener TE, Butticè S, Sahin B, et al. WhatsApp use in the evaluation of hematuria. Int J Med Inform 2018; 111: 17-23.
• 14. Stahl I, Dreyfuss D, Ofir D, et al. Reliability of smartphone-based teleradiology for evaluating thoracolumbar spine fractures. Spine J 2017; 17: 161-167.
• 15. Stahl I, Katsman A, Zaidman M, et al. Reliability of smartphone-based instant messaging application for diagnosis, classification, and decision-making in pediatric orthopedic trauma. Pediatr Emerg Care 2019; 35: 403-406.
• 16. Yurtseven A, Altıntop İ, Bayram MK, et al. Acil Serviste Bilgisayarlı Beyin Tomografisini Fazla Mı Kullanıyoruz? Are We Overuse Computerized Tomography In Emergency Department? JAMER 2016; 1: 1-6.
• 17. Hukkelhoven CW, Steyerberg EW, Rampen AJJ, et al. Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury: an analysis of 5600 patients. J Neurosurg 2003; 99:666-673.
• 18. Osmond MH, Klassen TP, Wells GA, et al. CATCH: clinical decision rule for the use of computed tomography in children with minor head injury.  Can Med Assoc J 2010; 182: 341-348