Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2019, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 1 - 10, 12.04.2019

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Avcı, Ü. & Aşkar, P. (2012). The comparison of the opinions of the university students on the usage of Blog and Wiki for their courses. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 194-205.
  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
  • Brown, J. S. (2000). Growing up: Digital: How the web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(2), 11-20.
  • Calvó-Armengol, A., Patacchini, E. & Zenou, Y. (2009). Peer effects and social networks in education. The Review of Economic Studies, 76(4), 1239-1267.
  • Conole, G., & Alevizou, P. (2010). A literature review of the use of Web 2.0 tools in higher education. A report commissioned by the Higher Education Academy.
  • Cormode, G. & Krishnamurthy, B. (2008). Key differences between web 1.0 and web 2.0. First Monday, 13(6). Retrieved on May 15, 2018 from http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2125/1972
  • Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Dodor, B.A., Sira, N. & Hausafus, C.O., (2010). Breaking down the walls of teacher isolation. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences Education, 28(1), 1–12.
  • Ekici, M. & Kıyıcı, M. (2012). Using social networks in educational context. Journal of Social Sciences of Uşak University, 5(2); 156-167.
  • Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American educational research journal, 38(3), 653-689.
  • Giroux, H., (1985). Teachers as transformative intellectuals. Social Education, 49(5), 376–379.
  • Growth on social media platforms (2015). Pew Research Center, Retrieved on May 22, 2018 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/mobile-messaging-and-social-media-2015/2015-08-19_social-media-update_02/
  • İşman, A. & Albayrak, E. (2014). Sosyal ağlardan Facebook’un eğitime yönelik etkililiği. [Effectiveness of Facebook as a social network in education]. Journal of Education of Trakya University, 4(1), 129-138.
  • Jones, N., Blackey, H., Fitzgibbon, K. &Chew, E. (2010). Get out of Myspace! Computers & Education, 54 (3), 776-782.
  • Kadushin, C. (2012). Understanding social networks: theories, concepts, and findings. Oxford University Press.
  • Kamalodeen, V. J. & Jameson-Charles, M. (2016). A mixed methods research approach to exploring teacher participation in an online social networking website, International Journal of Qualitative Methods. Retrieved on May 27, 2018 from http://ijq.sagepub.com/content/15/1/1609406915624578.full
  • Koçer, M. (2012). Erciyes Üniversitesi öğrencilerinin internet ve sosyal medya kullanım alışkanlıkları. [Internet and social media habits of Erciyes University students]. Akdeniz Journal of Communication, 18(70-85).
  • Korucu, A. T. & Çakır, H. (2014). The view about dynamic Web technologies of computer teacher candidates. XVI. Paper presented at Academic Information System Conference, Mersin University.
  • Köşkeroğlu, Büyükimdat, M.K., Albayrak, D., Erdoğmuş, F.U., Yıldırım, S., Eryol, G. ve Ataman, Y.E. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının facebook kullanımları ve facebook’un mesleki geliģimlerindeki yeri konusundaki görüşleri. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2): 119-134.
  • Labaree, D.F., (2004). The trouble with ed schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M. J. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. Paper presented at Ascilite Conference, 2-5 December, Singapore.
  • MoNE (2008). Teacher qualifications: General and special areas. State Books Directorate. Ankara.
  • O'Reilly, T. (2009). What is Web 2.0? CA: O'Reilly Media Inc.
  • Öztürk, D. S., Öztürk, F., & Özen, R. (2016). Teachers’ use of social media tools for their professional development, Journal of Human Sciences. 7-21. Retrieved on May 20, 2018 from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3515
  • Sheldon, P. (2008). Student favorite: Facebook and motives for its use. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 23(2), 39- 53.
  • Sönmez, B. (2013) Sosyal medya ve ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin Facebook kullanım alışkanlıkları [Social media and Facebook usage habits of high school teachers]. Unpublished MA Thesis, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
  • TALIS (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First Results from TALIS, OECD Publishing.
  • Tufekci, Z. (2008). Grooming, gossip, Facebook and Myspace, Information, Communication & Society, 11, 544-564.
  • Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901.
  • www.statista.com (2016). Retrieved on May 15, 2018 from www.statista.com/chart/5194/active-users-of-social-networks-and-messaging-services/

Like, Follow, Share or Tweet? English Instructors' Use of Social Networking Sites for Professional Development

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 1 - 10, 12.04.2019

Öz

The aim of the study is to investigate the views of English
instructors on the use of social media tools and determine which social media
tools they use and which ones they use for their professional development (PD).
A questionnaire including three sections which aimed to provide personal
information about the participants, investigate their aspects of types,
frequencies and underlying reasons of using social media tools and examine their
perceptions on the use of social media tools for their PD was administered to a
group of instructors working at state universities. According to the findings,
there are differences in the type, frequency, and
reasons underlying the use of social media tools. It was also concluded that
teachers describe positive and collaborative professional activity facilitated
by social media tools and most of them noted how social media tools help them
tackle various forms of classroom related problems. 


Kaynakça

  • Avcı, Ü. & Aşkar, P. (2012). The comparison of the opinions of the university students on the usage of Blog and Wiki for their courses. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 194-205.
  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
  • Brown, J. S. (2000). Growing up: Digital: How the web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(2), 11-20.
  • Calvó-Armengol, A., Patacchini, E. & Zenou, Y. (2009). Peer effects and social networks in education. The Review of Economic Studies, 76(4), 1239-1267.
  • Conole, G., & Alevizou, P. (2010). A literature review of the use of Web 2.0 tools in higher education. A report commissioned by the Higher Education Academy.
  • Cormode, G. & Krishnamurthy, B. (2008). Key differences between web 1.0 and web 2.0. First Monday, 13(6). Retrieved on May 15, 2018 from http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2125/1972
  • Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Dodor, B.A., Sira, N. & Hausafus, C.O., (2010). Breaking down the walls of teacher isolation. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences Education, 28(1), 1–12.
  • Ekici, M. & Kıyıcı, M. (2012). Using social networks in educational context. Journal of Social Sciences of Uşak University, 5(2); 156-167.
  • Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American educational research journal, 38(3), 653-689.
  • Giroux, H., (1985). Teachers as transformative intellectuals. Social Education, 49(5), 376–379.
  • Growth on social media platforms (2015). Pew Research Center, Retrieved on May 22, 2018 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/mobile-messaging-and-social-media-2015/2015-08-19_social-media-update_02/
  • İşman, A. & Albayrak, E. (2014). Sosyal ağlardan Facebook’un eğitime yönelik etkililiği. [Effectiveness of Facebook as a social network in education]. Journal of Education of Trakya University, 4(1), 129-138.
  • Jones, N., Blackey, H., Fitzgibbon, K. &Chew, E. (2010). Get out of Myspace! Computers & Education, 54 (3), 776-782.
  • Kadushin, C. (2012). Understanding social networks: theories, concepts, and findings. Oxford University Press.
  • Kamalodeen, V. J. & Jameson-Charles, M. (2016). A mixed methods research approach to exploring teacher participation in an online social networking website, International Journal of Qualitative Methods. Retrieved on May 27, 2018 from http://ijq.sagepub.com/content/15/1/1609406915624578.full
  • Koçer, M. (2012). Erciyes Üniversitesi öğrencilerinin internet ve sosyal medya kullanım alışkanlıkları. [Internet and social media habits of Erciyes University students]. Akdeniz Journal of Communication, 18(70-85).
  • Korucu, A. T. & Çakır, H. (2014). The view about dynamic Web technologies of computer teacher candidates. XVI. Paper presented at Academic Information System Conference, Mersin University.
  • Köşkeroğlu, Büyükimdat, M.K., Albayrak, D., Erdoğmuş, F.U., Yıldırım, S., Eryol, G. ve Ataman, Y.E. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının facebook kullanımları ve facebook’un mesleki geliģimlerindeki yeri konusundaki görüşleri. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2): 119-134.
  • Labaree, D.F., (2004). The trouble with ed schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M. J. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. Paper presented at Ascilite Conference, 2-5 December, Singapore.
  • MoNE (2008). Teacher qualifications: General and special areas. State Books Directorate. Ankara.
  • O'Reilly, T. (2009). What is Web 2.0? CA: O'Reilly Media Inc.
  • Öztürk, D. S., Öztürk, F., & Özen, R. (2016). Teachers’ use of social media tools for their professional development, Journal of Human Sciences. 7-21. Retrieved on May 20, 2018 from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3515
  • Sheldon, P. (2008). Student favorite: Facebook and motives for its use. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 23(2), 39- 53.
  • Sönmez, B. (2013) Sosyal medya ve ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin Facebook kullanım alışkanlıkları [Social media and Facebook usage habits of high school teachers]. Unpublished MA Thesis, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
  • TALIS (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First Results from TALIS, OECD Publishing.
  • Tufekci, Z. (2008). Grooming, gossip, Facebook and Myspace, Information, Communication & Society, 11, 544-564.
  • Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901.
  • www.statista.com (2016). Retrieved on May 15, 2018 from www.statista.com/chart/5194/active-users-of-social-networks-and-messaging-services/

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm Original Article
Yazarlar

Zeynep CANLI Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-1285-3364

Yayımlanma Tarihi 12 Nisan 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA CANLI, Z. (2019). Like, Follow, Share or Tweet? English Instructors’ Use of Social Networking Sites for Professional Development. Language and Technology, 1(1), 1-10.

Language and Technology