Research Article

University Students’ Sustainable Earthquake Awareness and its Determinants: Toward a Culture of Disaster Preparedness

Volume: 9 Number: 1 December 26, 2025

University Students’ Sustainable Earthquake Awareness and its Determinants: Toward a Culture of Disaster Preparedness

Abstract

Earthquakes are among the most frequent and destructive natural disasters in Türkiye, underscoring the critical need for promoting sustainable disaster awareness among young populations. This study examined university students’ sustainable earthquake awareness and explored the factors associated with their awareness levels. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 429 students who voluntarily participated between November 2024 and January 2025. Data were collected online through a structured questionnaire that included sociodemographic characteristics, past disaster experiences, preparedness-related behaviors, and the Sustainable Earthquake Awareness Scale (SEAS). Descriptive statistics, appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests, and linear regression analyses were used to assess the relationships among variables. The mean SEAS score was 51.80 (SD = 13.27), indicating that overall awareness levels were lower than expected. Regression analysis revealed that being male, having a psychiatric condition, possessing knowledge of disaster preparedness plans, and having personal or family plans were significant predictors of higher sustainable earthquake awareness. These findings highlight the need for targeted educational and institutional initiatives to enhance disaster preparedness and build a more resilient culture within university settings.

Keywords

sustainable earthquake awareness , earthquake awareness , disaster preparedness , Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) , risk perception

References

  1. AFAD. (2014). Türkiye afet farkındalığı ve afetlere hazırlık araştırması. T.C. İçişleri Bakanlığı Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı. https://www.afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/afad.gov.tr/3923/xfiles/turkiye-afet-farkindaligi-ve-afetlere-hazirlik-arastirmasi_-2014-edited.pdf
  2. AFAD. (2023). Türkiye deprem tehlike haritası. T.C. İçişleri Bakanlığı Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı. https://www.afad.gov.tr
  3. Açıklamalı Afet Yönetimi Terimleri Sözlüğü. (n.d.). T.C. İçişleri Bakanlığı Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı. Retrieved December 14, 2025, from https://www.afad.gov.tr/aciklamali-afet-yonetimi-terimleri-sozlugu
  4. Aydın, S., & Demirtaş, S. (2022). Üniversite öğrencilerinin afet bilinci ve hazırlık düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, 3(1), 24–37.
  5. Erkin, Ö., Coşğun, M., Güler, B., Karaaslan, Ö., Almaç, C., & Dağ, Z. (2025). Bir kamu üniversitesindeki öğrencilerin afetlere ilişkin bilgi, tutum ve davranışlarının belirlenmesi: İzmir örneği. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, 8(1), 196–212.
  6. Fazeli, S., Haghani, M., Mojtahedi, M., & Rashidi, T. H. (2024). The role of individual preparedness and behavioural training in natural hazards: A scoping review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 104, Article 104379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104379
  7. Genç, M., & Sözen, E. (2021). The sustainable scale of earthquake awareness, development, validity and reliability study. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 11(1), 24–41.
  8. Gündüz, F. (2024). A phenomenological study on women's disaster experience in Türkiye. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 100, Article 104196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104196
  9. Harrington, L. M. B. (2016). Sustainability theory and conceptual considerations: A review of key ideas for sustainability and the rural context. Sustainability, 2(4), 365–382.
  10. Kapucu, N., Elmuti, D., & Aslan, A. (2020). Emergency preparedness and readiness of university students in the United States. Journal of Emergency Management, 18(2), 137–147.
APA
Öztürk, G., Karayilanoğlu, B., & Sakar, F. S. (2025). University Students’ Sustainable Earthquake Awareness and its Determinants: Toward a Culture of Disaster Preparedness. Lectio Socialis, 9(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.47478/lectio.1800490