This paper examines collective punishment from the perspective of the social identity approach, demonstrating that targeting all members of a group tends to backfire by strengthening rather than weakening their shared social identity. The fundamental rationale behind collective punishment is to create pressure on innocent group members, expecting them to react internally against guilty individuals, thereby bringing about a behavioral change. However, three case analyses focusing on Western sanctions imposed on Russia, trade tariffs implemented by the Trump administration against Canada, and Israel’s systematic policies in the Palestinian territories indicate that this strategy generally fails to achieve its intended outcomes. In accordance with the social identity approach, such external threats generate a shared sense of fate and victimhood within the punished group, thereby reinforcing ingroup solidarity and the collective sense of “we”. Consequently, anger is directed not toward the perpetrators within the group but toward the external punisher, rendering the punishing actor’s objective of dividing the ingroup ineffective. The research concludes that collective punishment is a destructive instrument that deepens polarization, erodes trust, and ultimately proven ineffective, or even counterproductive, in achieving its goals. These findings strongly emphasize that punishment, beyond its ethical and legal dimensions, should be grounded in individual responsibility and applied exclusively to actual perpetrators to ensure fairness and effectiveness.
collective punishment collective financial punishment retaliatory policies retaliatory tariffs punitive policies
This study did not require ethics approval because it used publicly available secondary data and did not involve direct interaction with human participants.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Social Policy (Other) |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | October 25, 2025 |
| Acceptance Date | November 24, 2025 |
| Early Pub Date | December 16, 2025 |
| Publication Date | December 26, 2025 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 9 Issue: 1 |
Lectio Socialis is a prestigious, international, and peer-reviewed journal that aims to provide a platform for scholars and researchers to share their work and ideas on policy-relevant topics related to social sciences. The journal welcomes high-quality articles from a wide range of disciplines, including economics, political science, public administration, business administration, international relations, urban planning, sociology, psychology, history, jurisprudence, and philosophy. The primary objective of Lectio Socialis is to maintain a vibrant, independent, and unbiased environment for scholars and researchers from different parts of the world to present their research, exchange ideas, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in their respective fields.