Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 519 - 534, 30.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1381548

Abstract

References

  • Akan, Y., ve Arslan, İ. (2008). Türkiye’de sektörel yatırım teşvik belgeleri ile istihdam analizi: Doğu Anadolu bölgesi üzerine bir uygulama (1980-2006). Çalışma ve Toplum, 1(16), 107-119.
  • Arestis, P., Mariscal, I. (1998). Capital shortages and asymmetries in UK unemployment. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 9, 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(97)00025-8
  • Balkan, B., Cilasun, S., and Turan, B. (2016). The impact of the Turkish employment subsidy programs on increasing the level of social protection for women. In Economic Research Forum Working Papers, 1022.
  • Bondonio, D., and Greenbaum, R. T. (2006). Do business investment incentives promote employment in declining areas? Evidence from EU objective-2 regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 13(3), 225-244, https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776406065432
  • Callaway, B., Sant’Anna, P. H. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200-230, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001
  • Cebeci, İ. (2012). Krizleri incelemede kullanılan nitel tercih modelleri: Türkiye için bir probit model uygulaması:(1988-2009). İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 62(1), 127-146.
  • Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, Electronic Data Delivery System (2022). Inflation rate, labor force participation rate. https://evds2.tcmb.gov.tr/
  • Cramer, J. S. (2003). Logit models from economics and other fields (First press). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615412
  • Emeç, H. (2021). İki durumlu modeller ve stata uygulamaları. In Birecik, Üçdoğruk Ş. ve Şengül S. (Eds.), Uygulamalarla mikroekonometri (Birinci baskı, 43-69). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  • Giovanis, E., Özdamar, Ö., and Akılotu, E. (2021). The effect of the regional “income tax withholding allowance” and “social security premium support” programmes on labour outcomes in Turkey. Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, 17(3), 111-138, https://doi.org/10.1515/rmeef-2020-0040
  • Gujurati, D. N., Porter, D.C. (2014). Temel ekonometri (Beşinci baskı). Literatür Yayıncılık.
  • Hazman, G. G., Büyükben, N. K. (2020). Vergi teşviklerinin yerel ekonomik büyüme ve istihdam üzerindeki etkisi: TR33 bölgesi açısından değerlendirme. Maliye Dergisi, 179, 186-212.
  • Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605-654, https://doi.org/10.2307/2971733
  • Ljungqvist, A., Smolyansky, M. (2014). To cut or not to cut? On the impact of corporate taxes on employment and income. National Bureau of Economic Research, (20753).
  • Mert, M. (2016). Yatay kesit veri analizi bilgisayar uygulamaları (Birinci baskı). Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Öz., E. ve Buyrukoğlu, S. (2017). Türkiye’de uygulanan yatırım teşvik politikalarının makroekonomik değişkenler üzerindeki etkisinin ampirik analizi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (27), 322-336, https://doi.org/10.550/pausbed.2017.67689
  • Polat, B., ve Aktakke, N. (2017). Etki değerlendirme yöntemleri. Kalkınma programlarının değerlendirmesinde etki analizi yöntemleri ve Türkiye’de uygulamalar (Birinci baskı, 19-50). Optimist Yayın Grubu.
  • Porsse, A., Haddad, E., Ribeiro, E. P. (2014). Economic effects of regional tax incentives: A general equilibrium approach. Latin American Business, 195-216, Routledge, https://doi.org/10.1300/J140v07n03_09
  • Ranchhod, V., Finn, A. (2016). Estimating the short run effects of South Africa's employment tax incentive on youth employment probabilities using a difference‐in‐differences approach. South African Journal of Economics, 84(2), 199-216, https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12121
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of Industry and Technology, General Directorate of Development Agencies (2019). Socio-economic development ranking of provinces and regions (2017). https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/merkez-birimi/b94224510b7b/sege/il-sege-raporlari
  • Rosenbaum, P. R., and Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
  • Schalk, H. J., Untiedt, G. (2000). Regional investment incentives in Germany: Impacts on factor demand and growth. The Annals of Regional Science, 34(2), 173-195.
  • Selim, S. , Koçtürk, O. M. & Eryiğit, P. (2014). Effect on employment of the investment incentives and fixed investments in Turkey: Panel data analysis. Ege Academic Review, 14(4), 661-674. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eab/issue/39934/474424
  • Shuai, X., Chmura, C. (2013). The effect of state corporate income tax rate cuts on job creation. Business Economics, 48(3), 183-193, https://doi.org/10.1057/be.2013.21
  • Stuart, E. A., Huskamp, H. A., Duckworth, K., Simmons, J., Song, Z., Chernew, M. E., Barry, C. L. (2014). Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 14(4), 166-182, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-014-0123-z
  • T.C. Resmi Gazete. (2009). 5838 sayılı bazı kanunlarda değişiklik yapılması hakkında kanun, https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2009/02/20090228M1-1.htm .
  • T.C. Resmi Gazete. (2012). Council of Ministers Decree on state aids in investments, 2012/3305. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2012/06/20120619-1.htm.
  • Tarı, R. (2016). Ekonometri (On ikinci baskı). Kocaeli Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Taylor, J., Bradley, S. (1997). Unemployment in Europe: A comparative analysis of regional disparities in Germany, Italy and The UK. Kyklos, 50, 221-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6435.00012
  • Toktas, Y., Sevinç, H., & Bozkurt, E. (2013). The evolution of regional development agencies: Turkey case. Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 15(2), 670-681.
  • Turner, T. M., Blagg, B. (2018). The short-term effects of the Kansas income tax cuts on employment growth. Public Finance Review, 46(6), 1024-1043, https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142117699274
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (Fifth edition). South-Western Cengage Learning.
  • Yavan, N. (2011). Teşviklerin bölgesel ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi: Ampirik bir analiz. Ekonomik Yaklaşım Dergisi, 22(81), 65-104, https://doi.org/10.5455/ey.20018
  • Yavuz, . Y. (2010). Bir maliye politikası aracı olarak yatırım teşviklerinin rekabet koşulları altında özel kesim yatırımları ve istihdam üzerine etkisi: Ekonometrik bir analiz. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 83-101

Analysis of the Effect of Reduced Corporate Income Tax Implementation on Employment in Turkey

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 519 - 534, 30.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1381548

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of regional differences in corporate income tax reduction rates on employment within the scope of the reduced corporate income tax implementation put into effect in 2009. The implementation aims to encourage and increase investments, production, employment, and large-scale investments to increase international competitiveness, foreign direct investment and support Research and Development (R&D) activities, and eliminate regional development differences by reducing corporate income tax rates by region. This paper focuses on employment outcome in particular. The analysis relies on the "TurkStat Household Labor Force Survey Micro Dataset" in 2004-2021 for Turkey. Difference in Differences (DID) and Difference in Differences with Propensity Score Matching (DID-PSM) methods were used in the impact analysis of the tax policy discussed in the study. We employ DID and DID-PSM methods, designating respondents in regions with the highest corporate income tax reduction rates as treated subjects, and those with the lowest corporate income tax reduction rates as control subjects. The effects of regional differences in corporate income tax reduction rates on employment have been empirically demonstrated. The findings show that the regional differences in corporate income tax reduction rates on employment significantly and positively affect employment.

References

  • Akan, Y., ve Arslan, İ. (2008). Türkiye’de sektörel yatırım teşvik belgeleri ile istihdam analizi: Doğu Anadolu bölgesi üzerine bir uygulama (1980-2006). Çalışma ve Toplum, 1(16), 107-119.
  • Arestis, P., Mariscal, I. (1998). Capital shortages and asymmetries in UK unemployment. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 9, 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(97)00025-8
  • Balkan, B., Cilasun, S., and Turan, B. (2016). The impact of the Turkish employment subsidy programs on increasing the level of social protection for women. In Economic Research Forum Working Papers, 1022.
  • Bondonio, D., and Greenbaum, R. T. (2006). Do business investment incentives promote employment in declining areas? Evidence from EU objective-2 regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 13(3), 225-244, https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776406065432
  • Callaway, B., Sant’Anna, P. H. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200-230, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001
  • Cebeci, İ. (2012). Krizleri incelemede kullanılan nitel tercih modelleri: Türkiye için bir probit model uygulaması:(1988-2009). İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 62(1), 127-146.
  • Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, Electronic Data Delivery System (2022). Inflation rate, labor force participation rate. https://evds2.tcmb.gov.tr/
  • Cramer, J. S. (2003). Logit models from economics and other fields (First press). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615412
  • Emeç, H. (2021). İki durumlu modeller ve stata uygulamaları. In Birecik, Üçdoğruk Ş. ve Şengül S. (Eds.), Uygulamalarla mikroekonometri (Birinci baskı, 43-69). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  • Giovanis, E., Özdamar, Ö., and Akılotu, E. (2021). The effect of the regional “income tax withholding allowance” and “social security premium support” programmes on labour outcomes in Turkey. Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, 17(3), 111-138, https://doi.org/10.1515/rmeef-2020-0040
  • Gujurati, D. N., Porter, D.C. (2014). Temel ekonometri (Beşinci baskı). Literatür Yayıncılık.
  • Hazman, G. G., Büyükben, N. K. (2020). Vergi teşviklerinin yerel ekonomik büyüme ve istihdam üzerindeki etkisi: TR33 bölgesi açısından değerlendirme. Maliye Dergisi, 179, 186-212.
  • Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605-654, https://doi.org/10.2307/2971733
  • Ljungqvist, A., Smolyansky, M. (2014). To cut or not to cut? On the impact of corporate taxes on employment and income. National Bureau of Economic Research, (20753).
  • Mert, M. (2016). Yatay kesit veri analizi bilgisayar uygulamaları (Birinci baskı). Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Öz., E. ve Buyrukoğlu, S. (2017). Türkiye’de uygulanan yatırım teşvik politikalarının makroekonomik değişkenler üzerindeki etkisinin ampirik analizi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (27), 322-336, https://doi.org/10.550/pausbed.2017.67689
  • Polat, B., ve Aktakke, N. (2017). Etki değerlendirme yöntemleri. Kalkınma programlarının değerlendirmesinde etki analizi yöntemleri ve Türkiye’de uygulamalar (Birinci baskı, 19-50). Optimist Yayın Grubu.
  • Porsse, A., Haddad, E., Ribeiro, E. P. (2014). Economic effects of regional tax incentives: A general equilibrium approach. Latin American Business, 195-216, Routledge, https://doi.org/10.1300/J140v07n03_09
  • Ranchhod, V., Finn, A. (2016). Estimating the short run effects of South Africa's employment tax incentive on youth employment probabilities using a difference‐in‐differences approach. South African Journal of Economics, 84(2), 199-216, https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12121
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of Industry and Technology, General Directorate of Development Agencies (2019). Socio-economic development ranking of provinces and regions (2017). https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/merkez-birimi/b94224510b7b/sege/il-sege-raporlari
  • Rosenbaum, P. R., and Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
  • Schalk, H. J., Untiedt, G. (2000). Regional investment incentives in Germany: Impacts on factor demand and growth. The Annals of Regional Science, 34(2), 173-195.
  • Selim, S. , Koçtürk, O. M. & Eryiğit, P. (2014). Effect on employment of the investment incentives and fixed investments in Turkey: Panel data analysis. Ege Academic Review, 14(4), 661-674. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eab/issue/39934/474424
  • Shuai, X., Chmura, C. (2013). The effect of state corporate income tax rate cuts on job creation. Business Economics, 48(3), 183-193, https://doi.org/10.1057/be.2013.21
  • Stuart, E. A., Huskamp, H. A., Duckworth, K., Simmons, J., Song, Z., Chernew, M. E., Barry, C. L. (2014). Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 14(4), 166-182, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-014-0123-z
  • T.C. Resmi Gazete. (2009). 5838 sayılı bazı kanunlarda değişiklik yapılması hakkında kanun, https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2009/02/20090228M1-1.htm .
  • T.C. Resmi Gazete. (2012). Council of Ministers Decree on state aids in investments, 2012/3305. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2012/06/20120619-1.htm.
  • Tarı, R. (2016). Ekonometri (On ikinci baskı). Kocaeli Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Taylor, J., Bradley, S. (1997). Unemployment in Europe: A comparative analysis of regional disparities in Germany, Italy and The UK. Kyklos, 50, 221-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6435.00012
  • Toktas, Y., Sevinç, H., & Bozkurt, E. (2013). The evolution of regional development agencies: Turkey case. Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 15(2), 670-681.
  • Turner, T. M., Blagg, B. (2018). The short-term effects of the Kansas income tax cuts on employment growth. Public Finance Review, 46(6), 1024-1043, https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142117699274
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (Fifth edition). South-Western Cengage Learning.
  • Yavan, N. (2011). Teşviklerin bölgesel ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi: Ampirik bir analiz. Ekonomik Yaklaşım Dergisi, 22(81), 65-104, https://doi.org/10.5455/ey.20018
  • Yavuz, . Y. (2010). Bir maliye politikası aracı olarak yatırım teşviklerinin rekabet koşulları altında özel kesim yatırımları ve istihdam üzerine etkisi: Ekonometrik bir analiz. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 83-101
There are 34 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Applied Microeconometrics, Employment, Turkiye's Regional Policy and Planning
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Elyasa Aksoy 0000-0003-2224-7568

Publication Date June 30, 2024
Submission Date October 26, 2023
Acceptance Date June 26, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 11 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Aksoy, E. (2024). Analysis of the Effect of Reduced Corporate Income Tax Implementation on Employment in Turkey. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 11(2), 519-534. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1381548

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The author(s) bear full responsibility for the ideas and arguments presented in their articles. All scientific and legal accountability concerning the language, style, adherence to scientific ethics, and content of the published work rests solely with the author(s). Neither the journal nor the institution(s) affiliated with the author(s) assume any liability in this regard.