Enhancing logistics terminology acquisition through game-based learning: A quasi-experimental study in maritime education

Year 2025, Volume: 14 Issue: 4, 180 - 190, 31.12.2025

Nergis Özispa , Taha Talip Türkistanlı

https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.1821727

Abstract

Logistics and maritime education present various challenges in effectively teaching the sector’s unique and complex terminology. To ensure students’ mastery of this terminology and to make the learning process more engaging, it is essential to develop innovative approaches that go beyond traditional methods. In this context, game-based learning emerges as a promising strategy for enhancing student engagement and motivation. This study aims to utilize game-based learning as an innovative instructional tool to make the teaching of domain-specific terminology in logistics education more effective, lasting, and engaging. For this purpose, a customized game inspired by the popular word game Taboo was developed and adapted to logistics terminology. By moving beyond conventional word-teaching techniques, this game fosters active student participation and collaboration, aiming to facilitate a more enjoyable and effective learning process for logistics terms. The study employed a quasi-experimental design as a quantitative research method and involved the development of a Logistics Terminology Game consisting of 130 term cards related to various aspects of logistics. The experiment was conducted with the participation of 48 students. Findings revealed that students who received instruction through game-based learning achieved approximately 18% higher learning outcomes compared to those who were taught using traditional methods. The results indicate that game-based learning in logistics education enhances knowledge retention, supports the association of concepts through new pathways, and increases learning motivation. Based on these findings, it is concluded that game-based approaches hold significant potential for teaching professional terminology in the fields of logistics and maritime studies. The study recommends integrating such methods into educational programs.

Keywords

Experimental design , Game-based learning , Logistics education , Logistics terminology game

Ethical Statement

The study has been approved by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee and have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Social and Human Sciences of Mersin University. The approval was granted on May 26, 2025, during the committee’s 5th meeting, under decision number 151.

References

• Akkuzu, N., & Uyulgan, M. A. (2016). How to improve students’ comprehension concerning the major terms of functional groups?--In the Experiment of OrCheTaboo Game. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), 196–212.
• Burney, E., Arora, M., Gaillard, M., Herzig, M., Lester, L., Park, S., & Coleman, C. (2024). A game-based tool for reducing jargon use by medical trainees. MedEdPORTAL, 20, 11411. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11411
• Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004
• Cvetić, B., & Vasiljević, D. (2012). Game-based enhancement of teaching logistics and supply chain management. The New Educational Review, 29(3), 162-173.
• Dabbous, M., Kawtharani, A., Fahs, I., Hallal, Z., Shouman, D., Akel, M., ... & Sakr, F. (2022). The role of game-based learning in experiential education: Tool validation, motivation assessment, and outcomes evaluation among a sample of pharmacy students. Education Sciences, 12(7), 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070434
• de Freitas, S., & Jarvis, S. (2006). A framework for developing serious games to meet learner needs. Proceedings of The Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation & Education Conference, USA. pp. 2742.
• Eugenijus, L. (2023). The effectiveness of multimodal task design in second language teaching. Research and Advances in Education, 2(12), 1-6.
• Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work?--A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, USA. pp. 3025-3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
• Kondayya, A. (2024). The games people play: using the game of Taboo to develop indigenous concepts. Decision, 209-215.
• Lestari, S. D., & Damanik, E. S. D. (2024). Students’ perceptions on the effectiveness of the taboo game in enhancing English vocabulary acquisition. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 6(2), 172-184. https://doi.org/10.31849
• Liu, C. L. (2017). Using a video game to teach supply chain and logistics management. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(8), 1009-1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1242503
• Lumbangaol, R. R. (2021). The effect of taboo word game in improving vocabulary ability. MELT (Medium for English Language Teaching) Journal, 4(2), 155-169.
• Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
• Pituxcoosuvarn, M., Tanimura, M., Murakami, Y., & White, J. S. (2025). Enhancing EFL speaking skills with AI-powered word guessing: A comparison of human and AI partners. Information, 16(6), 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16060427
• Qian, M., & Clark, K. R. (2016). Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.023
• Rosyidi, M. A., Fahriany, F., & Nahartini, D. (2022). The use of Undercover Game to enhance students’ vocabulary achievement. The Journal of English Literacy Education, 9(1), 1–12.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78
• Rzeczycki, A., Chrzastek, G., & Niemcewicz, P. (2024). Serious games in logistics education: Analysis of effectiveness and students’ decision-making processes. European Research Studies Journal, XXVII(Special Issue A), 925-967. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/3758
• Sari, S. D. N., & Agung, W. K. S. (2023). The effectiveness of Taboo game to improve students’ vocabulary mastery. ELTALL (English Language Teaching, Applied Linguistics and Literature) Journal, 4(2), 88-98. https://doi.org/10.21154/eltall.v4i02.7439
• Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293977
• Selvi, M., & Çosan, A. Ö. (2018). The effect of using educational games in teaching kingdoms of living things. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(9), 2019–2028. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060921
• Shelton, B. E., & Wiley, D. A. (Eds.) (2007). The design and use of simulation computer games in education. Brill.
• Tefa, K. V. E., Billik, M. O., & Olbata, Y. (2024). The use of taboo game to enrich students’ vocabulary in junior high school. Jurnal Edusaintek, 2(1), 20-29.
• Toma, I., Alexandru, C. E., Dascalu, M., Dessus, P., & Trausan-Matu, S. (2017). Semantic taboo–A serious game for vocabulary acquisition. Romanian Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 10(2), 241-256.
• Tuna Gündoğdu, R., & Kartal, Ş. (2024). The effect of teaching English vocabulary with the taboo game on students’ vocabulary learning achievement. International Innovative Education Researcher, 4(2), 176-205. https://doi.org/10.29228/iedres.71247
• Van Eck R. (2007) Six ideas in search of a discipline. In B. E. Shelton & D. A. Wiley (Eds.), The design and use of simulation computer games in education (pp. 31–60). Sense Publishing, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903121_005
• Wahyuni, S., & Junior, E. G. (2018). Gamification in English language teaching: Taboo and timeline. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on English Across Cultures, Indonesia. pp. 250-260.
• Wu, W. H., Hsiao, H. C., Wu, P. L., Lin, C. H., & Huang, S. H. (2012). Investigating the learning‐theory foundations of game‐based learning: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00437.x
• Yaacob, A., Narayanan, M., Suryani, I., Michael, P., & Yulianeta, Y. (2024a). Improving acquisition of business vocabulary using taboo word game. Journal of Human Development and Communication, 13, 79-84. https://doi.org/10.58915/johdec.v13.2024.1833
• Yaacob, Y., Narayanan, M., Alsaraireh, M. Y., Yulianeta, Y., MdHussin, H., & Suryani, I. (2024b). Effectiveness of taboo word game on augmenting business vocabulary competency through reflective action research. Arab World English Journal, 15(4), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no4.17