BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Floating Fish Farm Unit (3FU). Is it an Appropriate Method for Salmonid Production?

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 9 - 13, 23.07.2013

Öz

Off-shore aquaculture has become an important issue nowadays because of environmental sensitivities and rising conflicts between coastal zone users. From this point of view, a Turkish company has converted a ship into a fish farm in order to gain benefit from the open seas. A 19030 dead weight ton freight ship was transformed into an integrated fish farm to produce salmonids. A 60 m long suction pipe with 1 m diameter, was used for sea water intake from a desirable depth. Sea water was pumped into the fish culture tanks by using 5 pumps each with a capacity of 2500 m3h-1. Pure oxygen generated from an oxygen generator was added to seawater through diffusers for increasing stocking density by means of raised dissolved oxygen of culture media. In this floating fish farm, the initial average weight of Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) was 25±2.7 g. The trout reached 3.7±0.4 kg at the end of 11 months during the production on board. Feed conversion ratio, specific growth rate and stocking density were 1.1±0.1, 1.51±0.3 and 101±2.1 kgm-3, respectively. As a result of the study, trout production on a vessel that enables the use of water from different depth and regulate the water temperature and salinity according to the optimum levels of fish requirements. However, the high costs of crew and energy should be taken into consideration in terms of sustainability of efficient production.

Kaynakça

  • Ayer, N.W. and P.H., Tyedmers. 2009. Assessing alternative aquaculture technologies: life cycle assessment of salmonid culture systems in Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17 (3): 362–373.
  • Ablett, R.F., C.R. Marr, and J.D., Roberts. 1989. Influence of chronic subsurface retention on swimming activity of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in cold temperate conditions. Aquac. Eng., 8: 1–13.
  • Einen, O. 1998. Product quality in Atlantic salmon — influence of dietary fat level, feed ration and starvation before slaughter. Doctor Scientiarum Theses, Norges landbrukshøgskole, Ås, Norway.
  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2012. p. 230.The State Of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. FAO, Rome (2010) Fisheries Technical Paper.
  • Huguenin, J.E. 1997. The design, operations and economics of cageculture systems. Aquacultural Engineering, 16 (3): 167–203.
  • Korsøen, O.J., T. Dempster, F. Oppedal, and T.S., Kristiansen. 2012. Individual variation in swimming depth and growth in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) subjected to submergence in sea-cages. Aquaculture, 334: 142-151.
  • Teskeredžić, E., Z. Teskeredžić, M. Tomec, and Z. Modrušan. 1989. A comparison of the growth performance of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) in fresh and brackish water in Yugoslavia. Aquaculture, 77 (1): 1–10.
  • TUIK. 2012. p. 71. Fishery Statistics. Turkish Statistical Institute.
  • Wu, R.S.S. 2000. The environmental impact of marine fish culture: Towards a sustainable future. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 31 (4–12): 159–166.
  • Yiğit, M. ve O. Aral. 1999. Gökkuşağı Alabalığının (Oncorhynchus mykiss W.,1792) Tatlısu ve Denizsuyundaki Büyüme Farklılıklarının Karşılaştırılması (A Comparison of the Growth Differences of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss W.,1792) in Freshwater and Seawater-The Black Sea). Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 23: 53-59.
  • Yiğit M., E. Güven and S. Özesen Çolak. 2006. Karadeniz’de Ağ Kafeslerde Balık Yetiştiriciliğinin Gelişimi ve Karşılaşılan Sorunlar (Developments and Problems of Cage Aquaculture in the Black Sea). Su Ürünleri Mühendisleri Derneği Dergisi, 25-26: 33-39
Yıl 2013, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 9 - 13, 23.07.2013

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Ayer, N.W. and P.H., Tyedmers. 2009. Assessing alternative aquaculture technologies: life cycle assessment of salmonid culture systems in Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17 (3): 362–373.
  • Ablett, R.F., C.R. Marr, and J.D., Roberts. 1989. Influence of chronic subsurface retention on swimming activity of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in cold temperate conditions. Aquac. Eng., 8: 1–13.
  • Einen, O. 1998. Product quality in Atlantic salmon — influence of dietary fat level, feed ration and starvation before slaughter. Doctor Scientiarum Theses, Norges landbrukshøgskole, Ås, Norway.
  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2012. p. 230.The State Of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. FAO, Rome (2010) Fisheries Technical Paper.
  • Huguenin, J.E. 1997. The design, operations and economics of cageculture systems. Aquacultural Engineering, 16 (3): 167–203.
  • Korsøen, O.J., T. Dempster, F. Oppedal, and T.S., Kristiansen. 2012. Individual variation in swimming depth and growth in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) subjected to submergence in sea-cages. Aquaculture, 334: 142-151.
  • Teskeredžić, E., Z. Teskeredžić, M. Tomec, and Z. Modrušan. 1989. A comparison of the growth performance of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) in fresh and brackish water in Yugoslavia. Aquaculture, 77 (1): 1–10.
  • TUIK. 2012. p. 71. Fishery Statistics. Turkish Statistical Institute.
  • Wu, R.S.S. 2000. The environmental impact of marine fish culture: Towards a sustainable future. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 31 (4–12): 159–166.
  • Yiğit, M. ve O. Aral. 1999. Gökkuşağı Alabalığının (Oncorhynchus mykiss W.,1792) Tatlısu ve Denizsuyundaki Büyüme Farklılıklarının Karşılaştırılması (A Comparison of the Growth Differences of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss W.,1792) in Freshwater and Seawater-The Black Sea). Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 23: 53-59.
  • Yiğit M., E. Güven and S. Özesen Çolak. 2006. Karadeniz’de Ağ Kafeslerde Balık Yetiştiriciliğinin Gelişimi ve Karşılaşılan Sorunlar (Developments and Problems of Cage Aquaculture in the Black Sea). Su Ürünleri Mühendisleri Derneği Dergisi, 25-26: 33-39
Toplam 11 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA42KT34SD
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Soner Bilen Bu kişi benim

Volkan Kızak Bu kişi benim

Aslı Müge Gezen Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 23 Temmuz 2013
Gönderilme Tarihi 11 Temmuz 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2013 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Bilen, S., Kızak, V., & Gezen, A. M. (2013). Floating Fish Farm Unit (3FU). Is it an Appropriate Method for Salmonid Production?. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 2(1), 9-13.
AMA Bilen S, Kızak V, Gezen AM. Floating Fish Farm Unit (3FU). Is it an Appropriate Method for Salmonid Production?. Mar. Sci. Tech. Bull. Temmuz 2013;2(1):9-13.
Chicago Bilen, Soner, Volkan Kızak, ve Aslı Müge Gezen. “Floating Fish Farm Unit (3FU). Is It an Appropriate Method for Salmonid Production?”. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin 2, sy. 1 (Temmuz 2013): 9-13.
EndNote Bilen S, Kızak V, Gezen AM (01 Temmuz 2013) Floating Fish Farm Unit (3FU). Is it an Appropriate Method for Salmonid Production?. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin 2 1 9–13.
IEEE S. Bilen, V. Kızak, ve A. M. Gezen, “Floating Fish Farm Unit (3FU). Is it an Appropriate Method for Salmonid Production?”, Mar. Sci. Tech. Bull., c. 2, sy. 1, ss. 9–13, 2013.
ISNAD Bilen, Soner vd. “Floating Fish Farm Unit (3FU). Is It an Appropriate Method for Salmonid Production?”. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin 2/1 (Temmuz 2013), 9-13.
JAMA Bilen S, Kızak V, Gezen AM. Floating Fish Farm Unit (3FU). Is it an Appropriate Method for Salmonid Production?. Mar. Sci. Tech. Bull. 2013;2:9–13.
MLA Bilen, Soner vd. “Floating Fish Farm Unit (3FU). Is It an Appropriate Method for Salmonid Production?”. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, c. 2, sy. 1, 2013, ss. 9-13.
Vancouver Bilen S, Kızak V, Gezen AM. Floating Fish Farm Unit (3FU). Is it an Appropriate Method for Salmonid Production?. Mar. Sci. Tech. Bull. 2013;2(1):9-13.

27116