Research Article

On (p, q) and (q, k)-extensions of a double-inequality bounding a ratio of Gamma functions

Volume: 4 Number: 2 October 30, 2016
Kwara Nantomah , Edward Prempeh , Stephen Boakye Twum
EN

On (p, q) and (q, k)-extensions of a double-inequality bounding a ratio of Gamma functions

Abstract

In this paper, the authors present the (p, q) and (q, k)-extensions of a double inequality involving a ratio of Gamma functions. The method is based on some monotonicity properties of certain functions associated with the (p, q) and (q, k)-extensions of the Gamma function.

Keywords

Gamma function, psi function, inequality, (pˏ q)-extension, (qˏk)-extension

References

  1. [1] C. Alsina and M. S. Tomás, A geometrical proof of a new inequality for the gamma function, J. Ineq. Pure Appl. Math., 6(2)(2005), Art. 48.
  2. [2] T. M. Apostol, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory, Springer-Verlag, 1976.
  3. [3] R. Díaz and E. Pariguan, On hypergeometric functions and Pachhammer k-symbol, Divulgaciones Matemtícas, 15(2)(2007), 179-192.
  4. [4] R. Díaz and C. Teruel, q, k-generalized gamma and beta functions, J. Nonlin. Math. Phys., 12(2005), 118-134.
  5. [5] F. H. Jackson, On a q-Definite Integrals, Quarterly Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 41(1910), 193-203.
  6. [6] V. Krasniqi and F. Merovci, Some Completely Monotonic Properties for the (p, q)-Gamma Function, Mathematica Balkanica, New Series, 26(2012), Fasc. 1-2.
  7. [7] K. Nantomah, Some Inequalities for the Ratios of Generalized Digamma Functions, Advances in Inequalities and Applications, 2014(2014), Article ID 28.
  8. [8] K. Nantomah and M. M. Iddrisu, The k-analogue of some inequalities for the Gamma function, Electron. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 2(2)(2014), 172-177.
  9. [9] K. Nantomah, E. Prempeh and S. B. Twum, The (q, k)-extension of some Gamma function inequalities, Konuralp Journal of Mathematics, 4(1)(2016), 148-154.
  10. [10] N. V. Vinh and N. P. N. Ngoc, An inequality for the Gamma Function, International Mathematical Forum, 4(28)(2009), 1379-1382.
APA
Nantomah, K., Prempeh, E., & Twum, S. B. (2016). On (p, q) and (q, k)-extensions of a double-inequality bounding a ratio of Gamma functions. Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes, 4(2), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.36753/mathenot.421447
AMA
1.Nantomah K, Prempeh E, Twum SB. On (p, q) and (q, k)-extensions of a double-inequality bounding a ratio of Gamma functions. Math. Sci. Appl. E-Notes. 2016;4(2):23-28. doi:10.36753/mathenot.421447
Chicago
Nantomah, Kwara, Edward Prempeh, and Stephen Boakye Twum. 2016. “On (p, Q) and (q, K)-Extensions of a Double-Inequality Bounding a Ratio of Gamma Functions”. Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes 4 (2): 23-28. https://doi.org/10.36753/mathenot.421447.
EndNote
Nantomah K, Prempeh E, Twum SB (October 1, 2016) On (p, q) and (q, k)-extensions of a double-inequality bounding a ratio of Gamma functions. Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes 4 2 23–28.
IEEE
[1]K. Nantomah, E. Prempeh, and S. B. Twum, “On (p, q) and (q, k)-extensions of a double-inequality bounding a ratio of Gamma functions”, Math. Sci. Appl. E-Notes, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 23–28, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.36753/mathenot.421447.
ISNAD
Nantomah, Kwara - Prempeh, Edward - Twum, Stephen Boakye. “On (p, Q) and (q, K)-Extensions of a Double-Inequality Bounding a Ratio of Gamma Functions”. Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes 4/2 (October 1, 2016): 23-28. https://doi.org/10.36753/mathenot.421447.
JAMA
1.Nantomah K, Prempeh E, Twum SB. On (p, q) and (q, k)-extensions of a double-inequality bounding a ratio of Gamma functions. Math. Sci. Appl. E-Notes. 2016;4:23–28.
MLA
Nantomah, Kwara, et al. “On (p, Q) and (q, K)-Extensions of a Double-Inequality Bounding a Ratio of Gamma Functions”. Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes, vol. 4, no. 2, Oct. 2016, pp. 23-28, doi:10.36753/mathenot.421447.
Vancouver
1.Kwara Nantomah, Edward Prempeh, Stephen Boakye Twum. On (p, q) and (q, k)-extensions of a double-inequality bounding a ratio of Gamma functions. Math. Sci. Appl. E-Notes. 2016 Oct. 1;4(2):23-8. doi:10.36753/mathenot.421447