Research Article

Some Remarks on the Equalities of Predictors in Linear Mixed Models

Volume: 9 Number: 4 December 31, 2021
EN

Some Remarks on the Equalities of Predictors in Linear Mixed Models

Abstract


Consider a transformed linear mixed model (TLMM) obtained pre-multiplying a linear mixed model (LMM) M : y = Zα + Rγ + e by a given matrix. This work concerns the problem of the equalities of linear predictors under the considered two LMMs under general assumptions. We characterize the equalities between the best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) under the LMM and its TLMM by using various rank formulas of block matrices and elementary matrix operations.

Keywords

BLUP, equalities, linear mixed model, random vectors, transformed model

References

  1. [1] Alalouf, I. S., Styan, G. P. H.: Characterizations of estimability in the general linear model. Ann. Stat. 7, 194-200 (1979).
  2. [2] Arendacká, B., Puntanen, S.: Further remarks on the connection between fixed linear model and mixed linear model. Stat. Papers. 56 (4), 1235-1247 (2015).
  3. [3] Baksalary, J. K., Kala, S.: Linear transformations preserving best linear unbiased estimators in a general Gauss-Markoff model. Ann. Stat. 9, 913-916 (1981).
  4. [4] Dong, B., Guo, W., Tian, Y.: On relations between BLUEs under two transformed linear models. J. Multivariate Anal. 131, 279-292 (2014).
  5. [5] Drygas, H.: Sufficiency and completeness in the general Gauss-Markov model. Sankhya ̄, Ser A. 45, 88-98 (1983).
  6. [6] Goldberger, A. S.: Best linear unbiased prediction in the generalized linear regression model. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 57, 369-375 (1962).
  7. [7] Güler, N.: On relations between BLUPs under two transformed linear random-effects models. Commun. Statist. Simulation and Computation. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2020.1757709
  8. [8] Harville, D.: Extension of the Gauss-Markov theorem to include the estimation of random effects. Ann. Stat. 4, 384-395 (1976).
  9. [9] Haslett, S. J., Puntanen, S.: Equality of BLUEs or BLUPs under two linear models using stochastic restrictions. Stat. Papers. 51 (2), 465-475 (2010).
  10. [10] Haslett, S. J., Puntanen, S.: On the equality of the BLUPs under two linear mixed models. Metrika. 74, 381-395 (2011).
APA
Yiğit, M., Güler, N., & Eriş Büyükkaya, M. (2021). Some Remarks on the Equalities of Predictors in Linear Mixed Models. Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes, 9(4), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.36753/mathenot.892258
AMA
1.Yiğit M, Güler N, Eriş Büyükkaya M. Some Remarks on the Equalities of Predictors in Linear Mixed Models. Math. Sci. Appl. E-Notes. 2021;9(4):185-193. doi:10.36753/mathenot.892258
Chicago
Yiğit, Melike, Nesrin Güler, and Melek Eriş Büyükkaya. 2021. “Some Remarks on the Equalities of Predictors in Linear Mixed Models”. Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes 9 (4): 185-93. https://doi.org/10.36753/mathenot.892258.
EndNote
Yiğit M, Güler N, Eriş Büyükkaya M (December 1, 2021) Some Remarks on the Equalities of Predictors in Linear Mixed Models. Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes 9 4 185–193.
IEEE
[1]M. Yiğit, N. Güler, and M. Eriş Büyükkaya, “Some Remarks on the Equalities of Predictors in Linear Mixed Models”, Math. Sci. Appl. E-Notes, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 185–193, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.36753/mathenot.892258.
ISNAD
Yiğit, Melike - Güler, Nesrin - Eriş Büyükkaya, Melek. “Some Remarks on the Equalities of Predictors in Linear Mixed Models”. Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes 9/4 (December 1, 2021): 185-193. https://doi.org/10.36753/mathenot.892258.
JAMA
1.Yiğit M, Güler N, Eriş Büyükkaya M. Some Remarks on the Equalities of Predictors in Linear Mixed Models. Math. Sci. Appl. E-Notes. 2021;9:185–193.
MLA
Yiğit, Melike, et al. “Some Remarks on the Equalities of Predictors in Linear Mixed Models”. Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes, vol. 9, no. 4, Dec. 2021, pp. 185-93, doi:10.36753/mathenot.892258.
Vancouver
1.Melike Yiğit, Nesrin Güler, Melek Eriş Büyükkaya. Some Remarks on the Equalities of Predictors in Linear Mixed Models. Math. Sci. Appl. E-Notes. 2021 Dec. 1;9(4):185-93. doi:10.36753/mathenot.892258