Incubation characteristics and their relation to the age of the parent flock for broiler production

Year 2024, , 99 - 103, 02.08.2024

Atanas Genchev Hristo Lukanov , Todor Petrov

https://doi.org/10.29136/mediterranean.1443067

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the incubation characteristics of hatching eggs from one of the widely distributed hybrid combinations of classic broilers globally and to trace the dynamics of their changes depending on the age of the parental flock. The study covered a 12-year period - between 2011 to 2023. The share of quality chicks hatched ranged from 76.8% to 91.6%, with average values of 84.1-84.3%, while the share of culled chickens was within the normal range (0.4 to 1.7%). The proportion of culled eggs during candling on the 7th day varied between 4.3% and 14.7%, with average values of 7.64-8.24%. With the increase in the age of the parental flock, there was a stable tendency to increase the share of culled eggs at the first test egg cull, particularly due to the increase of the share of infertile eggs. The age of the parental flock determined more than 38% of the manifestation of the egg fertility trait and about 45% of that of quality chicks. Its influence on total embryonic mortality was significantly weaker (R2= 0.1456). The study of the relationship between the traits “share of quality chicks” and “share of infertile eggs” showed that in the examined dataset, the correlation between them was moderate, negative (r= -0.472±0.100 at P<0.001), with a linear character (L= 0.046±0.062).

Keywords

Hatching eggs, Incubation, Hatchability, Vital chickens

Ethical Statement

Hereby, we consciously assure that for the manuscript "Incubation characteristics and their relation to the age of the parent flock for broiler production" the following is fulfilled: 1) This material is the authors' own original work, which has not been previously published elsewhere. 2) The paper is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 3) The paper reflects the authors' own research and analysis in a truthful and complete manner. 4) The paper properly credits the meaningful contributions of co-authors and co-researchers. 5) The results are appropriately placed in the context of prior and existing research. 6) All sources used are properly disclosed (correct citation). 7) All authors have been personally and actively involved in substantial work leading to the paper, and will take public responsibility for its content.

Supporting Institution

There is no supporting institution

References

• Aviagen (2021) Ross 308 Parent Stock. Performance objectives. Available at: https://aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_PS/Ross308-EuropeanParentStock-PerformanceObjectives-2021-EN.pdf. Accessed 15 October, 2010.
• Burtov YZ, Goldin YuS, Krivopishin IP (1990) Egg incubation. Handbook. Agropromizdat, Moscow. (in Russian)
• Buryan M (2006) Progress in genetics stimulates changes in incubation technology. Ptitsefabrika 10: 21-23. (in Russian)
• Cobb-Vantress (2020) Cobb500 Slow Feather Breeder: Management Supplement. Available at: https://www.cobb-vantress.com/assets/Cobb-Files/09cb72067f/Cobb500-Slow-Feather-Breeder-Management-Supplement.pdf. Accessed 08 October, 2023.
• Danilova AK, Naydenskiy MS, Shpits IS, Yavorskiy VS (1987) Hygiene of industrial egg production. 2nd ed., Rosselkhozizdat, Moscow. (in Russian)
• Dyadichkina LF (2016) Diagnosis of the causes of embryonic mortality in agricultural birds: a guide. 2nd ed. Sergiev Posad: VNITIP. (in Russian)
• EC (2008) Commission Regulation (EC) No 617/2008 of 27 June 2008 laying down detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards marketing standards for eggs for hatching and farmyard poultry chicks. Official Journal of the European Union, L 168/5.
• Fisinin VI, Stolyar TA, Tardatyan GA, Alexeev FF, Kovatskiy NS (1988) Poultry farming. Rosagropromizdat, Moscow. (in Russian)
• Genchev A, Lukanov H (2023) Incubation of agricultural birds based on biological control: Monograph. Academic Publishing House, Trakia University, Stara Zagora. (in Bulgarian)
• Hubbard Breeders (2022) Parent stock female. Performance objectives. Available at: https://www.hubbardbreeders.com/media/ps-performance-objectives-hep-enes-imp-20220704-ld.pdf. Accessed 12 October, 2023.
• Mailyan ES (2009) Features of incubation of modern crosses of meat poultry. In: V International Veterinary Congress on Poultry Farming, Moscow, pp. 37-48. (in Russian)
• Markaryan M, Tsonev T, Likov B (1986) Pathology of avian embryos and veterinary-sanitary measures in hatcheries. Zemizdat, Sofia. (in Bulgarian)
• Mymrin IA (1989) Broiler poultry farming. 2nd ed., Rosagropromizdat, Moscow. (in Russian)
• Official Gazette (2006) Ordinance 44 from April 20, 2006 on veterinary medical requirements for livestock facilities. Section IV. Veterinary-medical and zoohygienic requirements for hatcheries. Sofia: Official Gazette (NN 41/2006) Available at: https://dv.parliament.bg/DVWeb/showMaterialDV.jsp;jsessionid=3D051C354D99C58FA71A76A3FEE3D112?idMat=196747. Accessed 13 October, 2023.
• Orlov MV (1987) Biological control in incubation. Rosselkhozizdat, Moscow. (in Russian)
• Peñuela AS, Hernandez AV (2018) Characterization of embryonic mortality in broilers. Revista MVZ Córdoba 23(1): 6500-6513. doi: https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1245.
• Pizzari T (2017) Optimising fertility in British broiler breeder flocks - BBSRC Impact 7: 86-88. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21820/23987073.2017.7.86.
• Tullet S (2009) Ross Tech. Investigating Hatchery Practice. Aviagen. Available at: https://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Tech_Articles/RossTechInvestigatingHatcheryPractice.pdf. Accessed 05 December, 2023.
• Yassin H, Velthuis AGJ, Boerjan M, Riel J, Huirne RBM (2008) Field study on broiler eggs hatchability. Poultry Science 87(11): 2408-2417. doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00515.
• Yousaf A, Jabbar A, Shahnawaz R, Jamil T, Hassain A, Rais M (2018) Effect of hatch window upon intestinal development chick quality post hatch performance according to Ross-308 broiler breeder age. Journal of Dairy Veterinary & Animal Research 7(6): 293-297. doi: https://doi.org/10.15406/jdvar.2018.07.00229.