Adana kenti Çukurova ilçesi aktif yeşil alanlarının çok ölçütlü değerlendirmesi

Abstract

Günümüzde hızlı kentleşme ve yoğun nüfus artışı yeşil alanlar üzerindeki baskıların artmasına sebep olmaktadır. Giderek azalan yeşil alanlar halkın ihtiyaç ve isteklerine cevap vermekte yetersiz kalmaktadır. Kentlerde bireylerin doğaya olan özlemlerini ve rekreasyon etkinliklerini gerçekleştirebilecekleri alanlar olan aktif yeşil alanların kent içindeki işlevlerini yerine getirebilmeleri için nitelik ve nicelik olarak yeterli olması gerekir. Bu bağlamda, Adana kenti Çukurova ilçesinde aktif yeşil alanların nitelik ve niceliklerinin saptanmasında kullanılabilecek ölçütlerin belirlenmesi ve mevcut alanların bu ölçütlere uygunluğunun saptanarak geliştirme önerilerinin getirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada, ağırlıklandırılmış ölçütler yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu yöntem, araştırma alanında aktif yeşil alanların miktarını ve kalitesini belirlemek için, ölçütlere değer atama ve hesaplamaları içermektedir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, araştırma alanında herhangi bir aktif yeşil alanın en yüksek uygunluk sınıfında bulunmadığı saptanmıştır; Semt parkları orta uygunluk seviyesinde, mahalle parklarının % 8.33'ü en düşük,% 66.67'si düşük ve % 25'i orta uygunluk sınıfında; Oyun alanlarının % 2.7'si en düşük, % 16.23'ü düşük, % 67.56'sı orta, % 13.51'i yüksek; Spor alanlarının ise yarısı düşük, diğer yarısı yüksek uygunluk sınıfındadır. Çalışmadaki ölçütlerin dikkate alınmasıyla yapılacak düzenlemeler yeşil alanların mevcut durumun iyileştirilmesini sağlayacaktır.

Keywords

• Adana,Aktif yeşil alanlar,Uygunluk sınıfları,Ağırlıklandırılmış ölçütler yöntemi

Multi-criteria evaluation of active green spaces in Cukurova district in Adana

Abstract

Today, rapid urbanization and rapid population growth increase the pressure on green spaces which have become insufficient to meet public demands. The active green spaces – the places essential for individuals to satisfy their longing for nature and to realize their recreational activities – need to be sufficient in quality and quantity in function in urban areas. To form green spaces to meet the needs, these spaces need to be designed properly by determining their quantity and quality. In this regard, it was aimed to establish the criteria to determine the quality and the quantity of active green spaces in Cukurova district in Adana, Turkey. In the study, the weighted criteria method was used. This method involves assigning values and calculations to defined criteria for determining the quality and quantity of active green spaces in the research area. According to the results, none of the active green spaces within the studied area is suitable for the highest appropriateness level; all local parks are at middle appropriateness level, 8.33% of neighborhood parks are the lowest, 66.67% of them are low and 25% of them are middle regarding appropriateness levels; 2.7% of the playgrounds are the lowest, while 16.23% of them are low, 67.56% of them are middle and 13.51% of them high; half of the sport areas are low, while the other half is high according to appropriateness level. The arrangements, which were made by taking into account the criteria in the study and based on the importance level priorities of active green spaces, will be able to raise the appropriateness levels of active green spaces.

Keywords

• Active green spaces,Adana,Appropriateness level,Weighted criteria method

References

1. Altunkasa MF (2004) “Adana's Urban Development Process and Green Areas”. Adana City Council Environmental Working Group Individual Report. Adana, pp. 23.
2. Ayaşlıgil T (1996) “Green Space System of Çanakkale City”, Environmental Problems of Canakkale Symposium” (9-13 September 1996), Çanakkale.
3. Bozkurt N (1994) “Analytical Approaches to Determination of Open and Green Spaces in Antakya City”, Cukurova University, Institute of Basic and Applied Sciences Department of Landscape Architecture, M. Science Thesis, Adana.
4. Ceylan A (2007) “The importance of urban green spaces in increasing the quality of life and Relate to Urban Transformation. University, Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Basic and Applied Sciences Department of Landscape Architecture, M. Science Thesis Istanbul. Çinçinoğlu A (2001) “Determination of Open and Green Space System in Antakya City and Evaluation in terms of Landscape Architecture” Mustafa Kemal University, Institute of Basic and Applied Sciences Department of Landscape Architecture, M. Science Thesis, pp. 99, Antakya.
5. Emür SH, Onsekiz D (2007) The Importance of Open and Green Areas in the Components of Urban Life Quality-the Analysis of Park Areas in Kayseri/Kocasinan District. Erciyes University, Journal of Social Sciences Institute, (22): 367–369.
6. Ersoy M (1994) Usage Norms of Urban Areas”, Middle East Technical University Faculty of Architecture Publications, Ankara.
7. Etli A (2002) “The Study of Open Green Area System of Edirne City As Regards Landscape Architectural Principles”, Trakya University Journal of Scientific Research, B series, 3, (1): 47–59 ISSN: 1302 647X.
8. Eymirli S (1994) Determination of Open and Green Spaces of Erzurum City. Cukurova Üniversity, Institute of Basic and Applied Sciences Department of Landscape Architecture, M. Science Thesis, Adana.

9. Gültekin E, Altunkasa MF (1983) Research on the Physical Examination and Sufficiency of Children's Playgrounds in Three Great Cities of Cukurova Region”. Cukurova University Faculty of Agriculture. Departments of Landscape Architecture, Adana.
10. Harris CW, Dines NT (1998) Time-Saver Standards for Landscape Architecture: Design and Construction Data, New York.
11. Hisarlı GA (1988) Research on Open and Green Spaces in Mersin. Cukurova University, Institute of Basic and Applied Sciences Department of Landscape Architecture, M. Science Thesis.
12. Levend ÖT (2008) Studying Open-Green Spaces in Bayrampaşa District of Istanbul. Selçuk University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, M. Science Thesis, s. 148, Konya.
13. Manavoğlu E, Ortaçeşme V (2007) Konyaaltı Kentsel Alanında Bir Yeşil Alan Sistem Önerisi Geliştirilmesi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2007(2): 261-271.
14. Oztürk S, Ozdemir Z (2013) The Effects of Urban Open and Green Spaces on Life Quality; A Case Study of Kastamonu”. Kastamonu Üniversity, Journal of Forestry Faculty, 13(1): 109-116.
15. Sorkun G (1996) “Evaluation of Playgrounds in Istanbul in terms of Landscape Architecture”. Istanbul University, Institute of Basic and Applied Sciences Department of Landscape Architecture, M. Science Thesis, Istanbul.
16. TUIK (2016) https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=95&locale=tr. (Accessed 10.09.2016).
17. Türk V (1993) “Today in Adana City Green Spaces and Studies to Be Done for the Future In the Light of Urban Development Perspective” Cukurova University, Institute of Basic and Applied Sciences Department of Landscape Architecture, M. Science Thesis, Adana.
18. TSI (1999) Turkish Standards Institution (TSI). Şehir İçi Yollar–Özürlü ve Yaşlılar İçin Sokak, Cadde, Meydan ve Yollarda Yapısal Önlemler ve İşaretlemelerin Tasarım Kuralları. Hazırlık Grubu: Şehir İçi Yollar Özel Daimi Komitesi, TS No: 12576.
19. Uzun G (1974) “A Research on the Determination of the Problems of Landscape Architecture of Adana City and the Solutions”. Cukurova University, Faculty of Agriculture, Adana.
20. Uzun G (1989) “Landscape Construction” Cukurova University, Faculty of Agriculture. No: 80 Adana.
21. Virtanen K (2017) Standard for Green Areas. Faculty of Technology Master Degree Programme in Environmental Technology Master Thesis. Lahti University of Applied Sciences. Finland.
22. Yağcı BS (2006) “Examination of Open and Green Areas in Adana North-East Urban Development Area” Cukurova University, Institute of Basic And Applied Sciences Department of Landscape Architecture, M. Science Thesis, pp. 242, Adana.
23. Zhang Y, Van den Berg AE, Dijk TV, Weitkamp G (2017) Quality over Quantity: Contribution of Urban Green Space to Neighborhood Satisfaction. International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health. 14(5): 535.