Domates hasat atıklarının farklı sıcaklıklarda prolizi ile elde edilen biyokömürün toprağın dönemsel besin elementi konsantrasyonlarına etkisi

Year 2019, Volume: 32 Issue: Special Issue, 75 - 78, 24.05.2019

İbrahim Erdal , Murat Memici Kamil Ekinci , Enise Sukuşu

https://doi.org/10.29136/mediterranean.558306

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Araştırmada farklı domates hasat kalıntılarından
farklı sıcaklıklarda yakılmasıyla elde edilmiş biyokömürün, toprağın bazı
yarayışlı besin elementi konsantrasyonlarına etkisini incelemek amaçlanmıştır.
Bunun için domates sapları 500 ve 700 derecede 80 dakika süreyle yakılarak
biyokömür elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen biyokömürler, arazi koşullarında 50x50
cm ölçülerinde hazırlanan parsellere dekara 3 ton olacak şekilde uygulanmış ve
doğal koşullarda beklemeye bırakılmıştır. Uygulamadan 2 ay sonra, 1 er ay
aralıklarla 4 dönemde toprak örnekleri alınmış ve bu örneklerde bitkiye
yarayışlı ve/veya çözeltiye geçebilen besin elementleri analizleri yapılmıştır.
Elde edilen sonuçlara göre biyokömür uygulamalarının toprakların besin elementi
içeriklerini genelde etkilemediği, hatta bazı besin elementleri üzerinde
olumsuz etki yaptığı görülmüştür. Yakma sıcaklıklarının biyokömürün etkinliği
üzerine bir etkisi görülmemiştir.

Keywords

Biyokömür, Besin elementi, Domates hasat kalıntısı, Toprak

Effects of tomato harvest residue derived biochars obtained from different pyrolysis temperature on periodical available nutrient concentrations of soils

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of biochars obtained by pyrolysis of the tomato harvest residues at different temperatures on some available nutrient concentrations of soil. For this purpose, biochars were obtained by pyrolysis of the tomato harvest residues at 500 and 700° C for 80 minutes. The biochars were applied to the parcels prepared in 50x50 cm dimensions under field conditions to 3 tons per decare and they were left to stand in natural conditions. 2 months after the application, soil samples were taken in 4 periods at one-month intervals. In these examples, plant available and/or extractable nutrients were determined. According to the results, it was observed that biochar applications did not affect the nutrient concentrations of the soil and had a negative effect on some nutrients. The pyrolysis temperatures had no effect on the efficiency of biochar on soil nutrient concentration.

Keywords

Biochar, Nutrients, Soil, Tomato, Harvest residue

References

• Allison LE, Moodie CD (1965) Carbonate. In C.A. Black et al. (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis. (pp. 1379–1400), Madison, WI, USA: Am. Soc. of Agron.Inc. Part 2, Agronomy 9.
• Bouyoucos GL (1951) A recalibration of the hydrometer for making mechanical analysis of soil. Agronomy Journal 43: 434–437.
• Erdal I, Memici M, Dogan A, Yaylaci C, Ekinci K (2018) Effects of tomato harvest residue derived biochars obtained from different pyrolysis temperature and duration on plant growth and nutrient concentrations of corn. In Proceedings 17th International Scientific Conference" Engineering for Rural Development", 23-25 May 2018, Jelgava, Latvia (pp. 547-553). Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies.
• FAO (1990) Nutrient Assessment at the Country Level: An International Study. FAO Soils Bulletin 63. Rome.
• Herath HMSK, Camps-Arbestain M, Hedley M (2013) Effect of biochar on soil physical properties in two contrasting soils: an Alfisol and an Andisol. Geoderma 209: 188-197.
• Jackson ML (1967) Soil chemical analysis, New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Private Limited.
• Jiang C, Yu G, Li Y, Cao G, Yang Z, Sheng W, Yu W (2012) Nutrient resorption of coexistence species in alpine meadow of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau explains plant adaptation to nutrient-poor environment. Ecological Engineering 44: 1-9.
• Lehmann J, da Silva JP, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant and Soil 249(2): 343-357.
• Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems a review, Mit. Adapt. Strat. Global Change 11: 403- 427.
• Lehmann J (2007) Bio-energy in the black, Front. Ecol. Environ 5: 381- 387.
• Lehmann J, Kuzyakov Y, Pan G, Ok YS (2015) Biochars and the plant-soil interface. Plant Soil 395: 1-5.
• Lehmann J, Joseph S (2015) Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. Routledge.
• Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1969) Development of a DTPA micronutrient soil test. Soil Science Society of American Proceeding 35: 600–602.
• Machado S, Awale R, Pritchett L, Rhinhart K (2018) Alkaline biochar amendmen increased soil pH, carbon, and crop yield. Crops and Soils 51(6): 38-39.
• Nigussie A, Kissi E, Misganaw M, Ambaw G (2012) Effect of biochar application on soil properties and nutrient uptake of lettuces (Lactuca sativa) grown in chromium polluted soils. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science 12(3): 369-376.
• Olsen SR (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department Of Agriculture; Washington.
• Peech M (1965) Hydrogen-ion activity. In C.A. Black (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, pp. 914–916.
• Peng XYLL, Ye LL, Wang CH, Zhou H, Sun B (2011) Temperature-and duration-dependent rice straw-derived biochar: Characteristics and its effects on soil properties of an Ultisol in southern China. Soil and Tillage Research 112(2): 159-166.
• Schmidt MWI, Noack AG (2000) Black carbon in soils and sediments: Analysis, distribution, implications, and current challenges. Global Biogeochem. Cyc. 14: 777-793.
• Silber A, Levkovitch I, Graber ER (2010) pH-dependent mineral release and surface properties of cornstraw biochar: agronomic implications. Environmental science & technology 44(24): 9318-9323.
• Sohi SP, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R (2010) A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. In: Donald LS, editor. Advances in agronomy. Chapter 2 – San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 47–82.
• Tryon EH (1948) Effect of charcoal on certain physical, chemical and biological properties of forest soils. Ecological Monographs 18: 81-115.
• Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan KY, Downie A, Rust J, Joseph S, Cowie A (2010) Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant and Soil 327(1-2): 235-246.
• Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37(1): 29–38.