Co-digestion of spoiled maize silage with cattle manure

Year 2021, Volume: 34 Issue: 3, 287 - 291, 01.12.2021

Ali Aybek , Mehmet Solak , Kamil Ekinci

https://doi.org/10.29136/mediterranean.891722

Cited By: 1

Abstract

In this study, spoiled maize silage (SMS) and cattle manure were co-digested at five different mixtures by the Hohenheim Batch Yield Test unit under mesophilic conditions to explore biogas production possibilities of these wastes together. The mixtures were 100% cattle manure, 100% SMS, 85% cattle manure + 15% SMS, 70% cattle manure + 30% SMS, and 55% cattle manure + 45% SMS. Chemical properties of raw materials and mixtures, including crude fat, dry matter, organic matter, and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents were determined. As the amount of SMS in the mixtures increased, biogas and methane production increased. The highest cumulative specific biogas and methane production were determined for 100% SMS as 0.62 Nm3 kg-1 organic matter (OM) and 0.31 Nm3 kg-1 OM, respectively, where Nm3 is the volume of biogas under normal conditions. Methane content of the mixture containing SMS (49.99% to 51.87%) was higher than that of cattle manure only (44.01%). Furthermore, the mixtures which had lower ADF content yielded more methane and biogas. In conclusion, the efficiency of biogas and methane production can be increased by applying the co-digestion technique.

Keywords

Spoiled maize silage, Cattle manure, Co-digestion, Biogas, HBT

Supporting Institution

KSÜ BAP Birim Koordinatörlüğü

Project Number

2017/6-5 YLS

References

• Angelidaki I, Ahring BK (1993) Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of livestock waste: The effect of ammonia. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology 38: 560-564.
• AOAC (1990) Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC. The US.
• Arıcı Ş, Koçar G (2015) Effect of adding maize silage as co-substrate for anaerobic animal manure digestion. International Journal of Green Energy 12(5): 453-460.
• Aybek A, Üçok S, Bilgili ME, İspir MA (2015) Digital mapping and determination of biogas energy potential of usable animal manure and cereal straw wastes in turkey. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty 12(3): 109-120.
• Aybek A, Üçok S (2017) Determination and evaluation of biogas and methane productions of vegetable and fruit wastes with HBT method. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 10(4): 207-215.
• Ayhan AA (2013) Research on determination of biogas quantity from cattle manure and maize silage at different mixing ratio under mesophilic conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, Uludağ University, Bursa.
• Borreani G, Tabacco E (2010a) The relationship of silage temperature with the microbiological status of the face of corn silage bunkers. Journal of Dairy Science 93(6): 2620-9.
• Borreani G, Tabacco E (2010b) Use of new plastic stretch films with enhanced oxygen impermeability to wrap baled alfalfa silage. Transactions of the ASABE 53(2): 635-41.
• Driehuis F, Elferink SO (2000) The impact of the quality of silage on animal health and food safety: A review. Veterinary Quarterly 22(4): 212-6.
• Ergüneş G, Tarhan S, Yardım MH, Kasap A, Demir F, Önal I, Uçar T, Tekelioğlu O, Çalışır S, Yumak H, Yağcıoğlu A (2009) Farm Machinery. Nobel Science and Research Center, Publish No: 49, 544, Ankara, Turkey.
• Heffrich D, Oechsner H (2003) Comparison of different laboratory techniques for the digestion of biomass. Landtechnik 9: 27-30.
• Hutňan M, Špalková V, Bodík I, Kolesárová N, Lazor M. (2010) Biogas production from maize grains and maize silage. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 19(2): 323-329.
• Hutňan M (2016) Maize silage as substrate for biogas production. Advances in Silage Production and Utilization 16: 173-96.
• IEA (2015) Key World Energy Statistics https://www.ourenergypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/KeyWorld2016.pdf. Accessed 4 March 2021.
• Jimenez S, Cartagena MC, Aree A (1990) Influence of lignin on the methanation of lignocellulosic waste. Biomass and Bioenergy 21: 43-54.
• Khan NA, Tewoldebrhan TA, Zom RL, Cone JW, Hendriks WH (2012) Effect of corn silage harvest maturity and concentrate type on milk fatty acid composition of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 95(3): 1472-83.
• Klang J, Theuerl S, Szewzyk U, Huth M, Tölle R, Klocke M (2015) Dynamic variation of the microbial community structure during the long‐time mono‐fermentation of maize and sugar beet silage. Microbial biotechnology 8(5): 764-75.
• Korkmaz Y, Aykanat S, Çil A (2012) Biogas and energy production from organic wastes. SAU Journal of Science and Letters 12: 489-497.
• Mittweg G, Oechsner H, Lemmer A, Hanisch AR (2012a) Repeatability of a laboratory batch method to determine the specific biogas and methane yields. Engineering in Life Sciences 12(3): 270-278.
• Mittweg G, Oechsner H, Hahn V, Lemmer A, Reinhardt‐Hanisch A (2012b) Repeatability of a laboratory batch method to determine the specific biogas and methane yields. Engineering in Life Sciences 12(3): 270-278.
• Oslaj M, Mursec B, Vindis P (2010) Biogas production from maize hybrids. Biomass and Bioenergy 34: 1538-1545.
• Onurbaş Avcıoğlu A, Türker U, Demirel Atasoy Z, Koçtürk D (2011) Renewable energies of agricultural origin - biofuels. Nobel Academic Publishing Education Consultancy LLC, No: 72, Ankara, Turkey.
• Phipps RH, Sutton JD, Jones BA (1995) Forage mixtures for dairy cows: The effect on dry-matter intake and milk production of incorporating either fermented or urea-treated whole-crop wheat, brewers' grains, fodder beet or maize silage into diets based on grass silage. Animal Science 61(3): 491-6.
• Sun C, Cao W, Banks CJ, Heaven S, Liu R (2016) Biogas production from undiluted chicken manure and maize silage: a study of ammonia inhibition in high solids anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology 218: 1215-23.
• Temiz D, Gökmen A (2010) The importance of renewable energy sources in Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 2(2): 23-30.
• Ulusoy Y, Ulukardeşler AH, Ünal H, Alibaş K (2009) Analysis of biogas production in Turkey utilizing three different materials and two scenarios. African Journal of Agricultural Research 4(10): 996-1003.
• Üçgül D, Akgül G (2010) Biomass Technology. YEKARUM Journal (1): 3-11.
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583-3597.
• VDI 4630 (2006) Fermentation of organic material, characterisation of substrate, collectıon of material data, fermentatıon tests, VDI Gesellschaft Energietechnik.
• VDI-Richtlinie 4630 (2006) Verg¨arung organischer stoffe. VDIGesellschaft energietechnik, Dusseldorf, ICS 13.030.30; 27.190, pp. 59.
• Wilkinson JM, Davies DR (2013) The aerobic stability of silage: Key findings and recent developments. Grass and Forage Science (1): 1-9.
• Yaldız O (2000) Biogas Technology, Course Book. Akdeniz University Publications, Publication No: 78, pp. 181.
• Yılmaz M (2012) Turkey's energy potential of renewable energy and importance of the topic from the point of electric power generation. Ankara University Journal of Environmental Sciences 4(2): 33-54.