Assessment of water stress effects on red beet under the Mediterranean conditions

Year 2022, Volume: 35 Issue: 3, 167 - 173, 02.12.2022

Ahmet Kurunc , Kıvanç Hayri Doğanay

https://doi.org/10.29136/mediterranean.1095291

Abstract

Although there are numerous scientific data on the response of various plants to water stress, there are few studies on red beet in the literature, and non-specifically under the Mediterranean conditions. This study aimed to investigate the effects of water stress (WS) levels (control-WS0, low-WS20, medium-WS40, high-WS60, and extreme-WS80) on water use, growth, yield parameters, and yield response factor of red beet (Beta vulgaris) in Mediterranean conditions. During the growing season, the highest daily evapotranspiration values were 3.7, 2.8, 2.1, 1.4, and 0.7 mm for the control treatment, low, medium, high, and extreme water stresses, respectively. Soil salinity, plant height, fresh leaf yield, and storage-root yield values were decreased as water stress increased. However, there were no significant differences in soil pH, taproot length, and plant water use efficiency between treatments. Significantly important strong- or moderate-positive linear correlations were observed between soil salinity, evapotranspiration, plant height, fresh leaf yield, and storage-root yield values. The yield response factors for red beet storage-root and fresh leaf yields were found to be 0.88 and 0.98, respectively. The results revealed that red beet is slightly tolerant to water stress, with comparatively lower storage-root and fresh leaf yield reductions under the reduced evapotranspiration caused by water stress.

Keywords

Red beet, Water stress, Water use efficiency, Yield, Yield response factor

References

• Albouchi A, Bejaoui Z, El Aouni MH (2003) Influence d’un stress hydrique modéré ou sévère sur la croissance de jeunes plants de Casuarina glauca. Se´ cheresse 14: 137-142.
• Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop Evapotranspiration - Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
• Anonymous (2021) Long-Year Climate Data for Antalya Province. Antalya Meteorology Regional Directorate. Antalya.
• Bartels D, Sunkar R (2005) Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 24: 23-58.
• Boyer JS (1982) Plant productivity and environment. Science 218: 443-448.
• Carter MR, Gregorich EG, Pennock D, Yates T, Braidek J (2007) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Second Edition.
• Cemek B, Unlukara A, Kurunc A (2011) Nondestructive leaf-area estimation and validation for green pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) grown under different stress conditions. Photosynthetica 49: 98-106.
• Doorenbos J, Kassam A (1986) Yield Response to Water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33. FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
• Duzdemir O, Kurunc A, Unlukara A (2009a) Response of pea (Pisum sativum) to salinity and irrigation water regime. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 15: 400-409.
• Duzdemir O, Unlukara A, Kurunc A (2009b) Response of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) to salinity and irrigation regimes. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 37: 271-280.
• Hancioglu NE, Kurunc A, Tontul I, Topuz A (2020) Growth, water use, yield and quality parameters in oregano affected by reduced irrigation regimes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 101: 952-959.
• Hanson BR, Grattan SR, Fulton A (2006) Agricultural Salinity and Drainage. Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis.
• Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Gill SS, Fujita M (2013) Drought stress responses in plants, oxidative stress, and antioxidant defense. In: Tuteja N, Gill SS (eds) Climate Change and Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Weinheim, pp. 209-250.
• IBM SPSS Inc. (2012) SPSS Statistics for Windows.
• Kirigwi FM, van Ginkel M, Trethowan R, Sears RG, Rajaram S, Paulsen GM (2004) Evaluation of selection strategies for wheat adaptation across water regimes. Euphytica 135: 361-371.
• Kurunc A, Unlukara A, Cemek B (2011) Salinity and drought affect yield response of bell pepper similarly. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B: Soil and Plant Science 61: 514-522.
• Lobell DB, Schlenker W, Costa-Roberts J (2011) Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 333: 616-620.
• Peck R, Devore J (2012) Statistics: The Exploration & Analysis of Data. 7 ed. Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning, Boston.
• Pereira A (2016) Plant abiotic stress challenges from the changing environment. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 1-3.
• Richards L (1954) Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. USDA Handbook No:60. USDA, Washington D.C.
• Şalk A, Deveci M, Arın L, Polat S (2008) Özel Sebzecilik. Onur Grafik Matbaa ve Reklam Hizmetleri, İstanbul.
• Shrivastava P, Kumar R (2015) Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 22: 123-131.
• Stagnari F, Galieni A, Speca S, Pisante M (2014) Water stress effects on growth, yield and quality traits of red beet. Scientia Horticulturae 165: 13-22.
• Stewart JI, Hagan RM (1973) Functions to predict effects of crop water deficits. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division 99: 421-439.
• Ünlükara A, Kurunç A, Cemek B (2015) Green long pepper growth under different saline and water regime conditions and usability of water consumption in plant salt tolerance. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 21: 167-176.
• Viera HJ, Bergamaschi H, Angelocci LR, Libardi PL (1989) Performance of two bean cultivars under two water availability regimes. II. Stomatal resistance to vapour diffusion, transpiration flux density and water potential in the plant. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 24: 1045-1053. (in Portugal).
• Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A (2003) Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: Towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 218: 1-14.