Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

An Open Label Prospective Randomized Trial to Compare The Efficacy Tolerability and Cost Effectiveness of Brand Name Versus Two Different Generic Drug of Fixed Combination Dorzolamide 2% and Timolol 0.5% in The Treatment of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 3, 55 - 60, 31.12.2018

Öz

Purpose: To compare the efficacy tolerability and cost
effectiveness of brand name versus two different generic drug of fixed
combination dorzolamide 2% and timolol 0.5% in the treatment of primary open
angle glaucoma.

Methods: Sixty-six eyes of 66 patients with newly diagnosed,
open-angle glaucoma were included in this prospective, examiner masked,
randomized study.
 All patients underwent routine ophthalmic
examinations 
at baseline and 6 months of treatment. After initial examination, patients were randomly divided into three groups and
prescribed to use fixed combination treatment of 
dorzolamide/timolol
(D/T) brand name and two different generic name drops.
 Retrobulbar blood
flow was assessed with color Doppler imaging (CDI).
 At
end-of-treatment assessments, patients were requested to fill in a
questionnaire based on "the Comparison of Ophthalmic Medications for
Tolerability".

Results: Intraocular pressure (IOP) and CDI measurements were
similar at baseline. Compared to baseline, the brand name drop
had a better resistive
index lowering effect than two other generic drugs
, however the
difference was not statistically significant (p=0.056). Brand name D/T fixed
combination provided greater significant mean IOP reductions from baseline than
two other generic name drops (p=0.001). There were no statistically significant
differences in the IOP lowering effect between generic drops
(p=0.562). Tolerability was similar between groups. 
Generic
bottles failed to last a month for 80% patients.







Conclusions: Brand name product of D/T fixed combination is exactly more
effective in IOP reduction and seems to be having a better lowering effect on
resistive index, even a statistically significant result was not found.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Januleviciene I, Ehrlich R, Siesky B, Nedzelskiene I, Harris A. Visual function, optic nerve structure, and ocular blood flow parameters after 1 year of glaucoma treatment with fixed combinations. Eur J Ophthalmol 2009;19:790-797.2. Chen SD, Wang L, Zhang XL. Neuroprotection in glaucoma: present and future. Chin Med J 2013;126:1567-1577.3. Siesky B, Harris A, Ehrlich R, et al. Short-term effects of brimonidine/timolol and dorzolamide/timolol on ocular perfusion pressure and blood flow in glaucoma. Adv Ther 2012;29:53-63.4. Martinez A, Sanchez M. Effects of dorzolamide 2% added to timolol maleate 0.5% on intraocular pressure, retrobulbar blood flow, and the progression of visual field damage in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma: a single-center, 4-year, open-label study. Clin Ther 2008;30:1120-1134.5. Martinez A, Sanchez M. A comparison of the effects of 0.005% latanoprost and fixed combination dorzolamide/timolol on retrobulbar haemodynamics in previously untreated glaucoma patients. Curr Med Res Opin 2006;22:67-73.6. Harris A, Arend O, Kagemann L, Garrett M, Chung HS, Martin B. Dorzolamide, visual function and ocular hemodynamics in normal-tension glaucoma. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 1999;15:189-197.7. Martinez A, Sanchez-Salorio M. A comparison of the long-term effects of dorzolamide 2% and brinzolamide 1%, each added to timolol 0.5%, on retrobulbar hemodynamics and intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma patients. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2009;25:239-248.8. Martinez A, Sanchez-Salorio M. Predictors for visual field progression and the effects of treatment with dorzolamide 2% or brinzolamide 1% each added to timolol 0.5% in primary open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 2010;88:541-552.9. Fiscella RG, Jensen MK. Cost analysis of glaucoma medications. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:1108-1109; author reply 1109.10. Ikeda H, Tsukamoto H, Sawa A, Sugimoto A, Mishima H, Kihira K. Comparison of annual cost between brand and generic ocular beta-adrenergic blockers. Yakugaku Zasshi 2005;125:463-467.11. Schlenker MB, Trope GE, Buys YM. Comparison of United States and canadian glaucoma medication costs and price change from 2006 to 2013. J Ophthalmol 2015;2015:547960.12. Mehl B, Santell JP. Projecting future drug expenditures--2000. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2000;57:129-138.13. Barber BL, Strahlman ER, Laibovitz R, Guess HA, Reines SA. Validation of a questionnaire for comparing the tolerability of ophthalmic medications. Ophthalmol 1997;104:334-342.14. Beckers HJ, Schouten JS, Webers CA, van der Valk R, Hendrikse F. Side effects of commonly used glaucoma medications: comparison of tolerability, chance of discontinuation, and patient satisfaction. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246:1485-90.15. Alm A. Latanoprost in the treatment of glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol 2014;8:1967-1985.16. Dubois VD. Are generic topical prostanoids the way forward in the care of glaucoma patients? - No. Eye 2013;27:1002-1003.17. Titcomb LC. Are generic topical prostanoids the way forward in the care of glaucoma patients? - Yes. Eye 2013;27:999-1001.18. Chambers WA. Ophthalmic generics--are they really the same? Ophthalmology 2012;119:1095-1096.19. Aref AA. Generic drugs for the treatment of ocular conditions: changing the treatment landscape. Expert Rew of Clin Pharmacol 2014;7:551-553.20. Mammo ZN, Flanagan JG, James DF, Trope GE. Generic versus brand-name North American topical glaucoma drops. Can J Ophthalmol 2012;47:55-61.21. Stewart WC, Sharpe ED, Stewart JA, Hott CE. The safety and efficacy of timolol 0.5% in xanthan gum versus timolol gel forming solution 0.5%. Curr Eye Res 2002;24:387-391.22. Narayanaswamy A, Neog A, Baskaran M, et al. A randomized, crossover, open label pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xalatan in comparison with generic Latanoprost (Latoprost) in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Indian J Ophthalmol 2007;55:127-131.23. Egan P, Harris A, Siesky B, et al. Comparison of intraocular pressure in glaucoma subjects treated with Xalatan versus generic latanoprost. Acta Ophthalmol 2014;92:e415-416.24. Kim YI, Kim JH, Lee TY, Lee KW. Efficacy and Safety of Glaucoma Patients' Switch from a 2% Dorzolamide/0.5% Timolol Fixed-Combination Brand-Name Drug to Its Generic Counterpart. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2015;31:335-339.
Yıl 2018, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 3, 55 - 60, 31.12.2018

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Januleviciene I, Ehrlich R, Siesky B, Nedzelskiene I, Harris A. Visual function, optic nerve structure, and ocular blood flow parameters after 1 year of glaucoma treatment with fixed combinations. Eur J Ophthalmol 2009;19:790-797.2. Chen SD, Wang L, Zhang XL. Neuroprotection in glaucoma: present and future. Chin Med J 2013;126:1567-1577.3. Siesky B, Harris A, Ehrlich R, et al. Short-term effects of brimonidine/timolol and dorzolamide/timolol on ocular perfusion pressure and blood flow in glaucoma. Adv Ther 2012;29:53-63.4. Martinez A, Sanchez M. Effects of dorzolamide 2% added to timolol maleate 0.5% on intraocular pressure, retrobulbar blood flow, and the progression of visual field damage in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma: a single-center, 4-year, open-label study. Clin Ther 2008;30:1120-1134.5. Martinez A, Sanchez M. A comparison of the effects of 0.005% latanoprost and fixed combination dorzolamide/timolol on retrobulbar haemodynamics in previously untreated glaucoma patients. Curr Med Res Opin 2006;22:67-73.6. Harris A, Arend O, Kagemann L, Garrett M, Chung HS, Martin B. Dorzolamide, visual function and ocular hemodynamics in normal-tension glaucoma. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 1999;15:189-197.7. Martinez A, Sanchez-Salorio M. A comparison of the long-term effects of dorzolamide 2% and brinzolamide 1%, each added to timolol 0.5%, on retrobulbar hemodynamics and intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma patients. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2009;25:239-248.8. Martinez A, Sanchez-Salorio M. Predictors for visual field progression and the effects of treatment with dorzolamide 2% or brinzolamide 1% each added to timolol 0.5% in primary open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 2010;88:541-552.9. Fiscella RG, Jensen MK. Cost analysis of glaucoma medications. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:1108-1109; author reply 1109.10. Ikeda H, Tsukamoto H, Sawa A, Sugimoto A, Mishima H, Kihira K. Comparison of annual cost between brand and generic ocular beta-adrenergic blockers. Yakugaku Zasshi 2005;125:463-467.11. Schlenker MB, Trope GE, Buys YM. Comparison of United States and canadian glaucoma medication costs and price change from 2006 to 2013. J Ophthalmol 2015;2015:547960.12. Mehl B, Santell JP. Projecting future drug expenditures--2000. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2000;57:129-138.13. Barber BL, Strahlman ER, Laibovitz R, Guess HA, Reines SA. Validation of a questionnaire for comparing the tolerability of ophthalmic medications. Ophthalmol 1997;104:334-342.14. Beckers HJ, Schouten JS, Webers CA, van der Valk R, Hendrikse F. Side effects of commonly used glaucoma medications: comparison of tolerability, chance of discontinuation, and patient satisfaction. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246:1485-90.15. Alm A. Latanoprost in the treatment of glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol 2014;8:1967-1985.16. Dubois VD. Are generic topical prostanoids the way forward in the care of glaucoma patients? - No. Eye 2013;27:1002-1003.17. Titcomb LC. Are generic topical prostanoids the way forward in the care of glaucoma patients? - Yes. Eye 2013;27:999-1001.18. Chambers WA. Ophthalmic generics--are they really the same? Ophthalmology 2012;119:1095-1096.19. Aref AA. Generic drugs for the treatment of ocular conditions: changing the treatment landscape. Expert Rew of Clin Pharmacol 2014;7:551-553.20. Mammo ZN, Flanagan JG, James DF, Trope GE. Generic versus brand-name North American topical glaucoma drops. Can J Ophthalmol 2012;47:55-61.21. Stewart WC, Sharpe ED, Stewart JA, Hott CE. The safety and efficacy of timolol 0.5% in xanthan gum versus timolol gel forming solution 0.5%. Curr Eye Res 2002;24:387-391.22. Narayanaswamy A, Neog A, Baskaran M, et al. A randomized, crossover, open label pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xalatan in comparison with generic Latanoprost (Latoprost) in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Indian J Ophthalmol 2007;55:127-131.23. Egan P, Harris A, Siesky B, et al. Comparison of intraocular pressure in glaucoma subjects treated with Xalatan versus generic latanoprost. Acta Ophthalmol 2014;92:e415-416.24. Kim YI, Kim JH, Lee TY, Lee KW. Efficacy and Safety of Glaucoma Patients' Switch from a 2% Dorzolamide/0.5% Timolol Fixed-Combination Brand-Name Drug to Its Generic Counterpart. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2015;31:335-339.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Klinik Tıp Bilimleri
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Mustafa Eliaçık

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi 26 Kasım 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Eliaçık M. An Open Label Prospective Randomized Trial to Compare The Efficacy Tolerability and Cost Effectiveness of Brand Name Versus Two Different Generic Drug of Fixed Combination Dorzolamide 2% and Timolol 0.5% in The Treatment of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. MRR. 2018;1(3):55-60.