Research Article

CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS OF TRADITIONAL AND NON-TRADITIONAL BRANDS

Volume: 3 Number: 1 June 30, 2017
EN

CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS OF TRADITIONAL AND NON-TRADITIONAL BRANDS

Abstract

This study aims to compare consumers' brand perception of traditional brands with brand perceptions of non-traditional brands.  Consumers living in Ankara constitute the universe of work, and data were gathered in a face-to-face interview using the survey method. the demographic characteristics of the participants was prepared with the aim of evaluating and comparing one traditional brand and one non traditional brand of brand equity related to the brand equity by the participants. According to the results of the study, the brand  equity perceptions of the traditional brands were found to be higher than the brand perceptions of the non-traditional brands. It has been found that there is a difference between perceptions of brand equity related to traditional and non-traditional brands, and that this difference is in favor of traditional brands. 

 

Keywords

References

  1. Aaker, David A. (1991). Managing brand equity: capitalizing on the value of a brand name, New York: Free Press.
  2. Aaker, David A. (1996). Building strong brands, New York: Free Press.
  3. Aaker, David A. (2004). Leveraging the corporate brand, california management review, 46 (3), 6–18.
  4. Alkibay, S. (2002). Marka değeri ve profesyonel spor kulüplerinin taraftar ilişkileri yoluyla marka değeri yaratmaları üzerine bir araştırma, Gazi Üniversitesi Ticaret ve Turizm Eğitim Fakültesi, Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi.
  5. Arjun Chaudhuri, Morris B. Halbrook, (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performence: the role of brand loyality, Journal of Marketing, Vol.65, p.83.
  6. Bearden, W.O, Hardesty, D.M., Rese R.L, (2001). Consumer self-confidence: refinements in conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1) June, p. 121-134
  7. George, Martin (2004). Heritage branding helps in global markets, Marketing News, 4 (13), 1.
  8. Hofstede G., Hofstede G. J., Michael M., (2010). Cultures and Organizations Doftware of the mind, Mc Graw Hill.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2017

Submission Date

March 17, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 3 Number: 1

APA
Catli, O., Ermec Sertoglu, A., & Ors, H. (2017). CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS OF TRADITIONAL AND NON-TRADITIONAL BRANDS. PressAcademia Procedia, 3(1), 290-301. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.414
AMA
1.Catli O, Ermec Sertoglu A, Ors H. CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS OF TRADITIONAL AND NON-TRADITIONAL BRANDS. PAP. 2017;3(1):290-301. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.414
Chicago
Catli, Ozlem, Aysegul Ermec Sertoglu, and Husniye Ors. 2017. “CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS OF TRADITIONAL AND NON-TRADITIONAL BRANDS”. PressAcademia Procedia 3 (1): 290-301. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.414.
EndNote
Catli O, Ermec Sertoglu A, Ors H (June 1, 2017) CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS OF TRADITIONAL AND NON-TRADITIONAL BRANDS. PressAcademia Procedia 3 1 290–301.
IEEE
[1]O. Catli, A. Ermec Sertoglu, and H. Ors, “CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS OF TRADITIONAL AND NON-TRADITIONAL BRANDS”, PAP, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 290–301, June 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.414.
ISNAD
Catli, Ozlem - Ermec Sertoglu, Aysegul - Ors, Husniye. “CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS OF TRADITIONAL AND NON-TRADITIONAL BRANDS”. PressAcademia Procedia 3/1 (June 1, 2017): 290-301. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.414.
JAMA
1.Catli O, Ermec Sertoglu A, Ors H. CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS OF TRADITIONAL AND NON-TRADITIONAL BRANDS. PAP. 2017;3:290–301.
MLA
Catli, Ozlem, et al. “CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS OF TRADITIONAL AND NON-TRADITIONAL BRANDS”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 3, no. 1, June 2017, pp. 290-01, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.414.
Vancouver
1.Ozlem Catli, Aysegul Ermec Sertoglu, Husniye Ors. CONSUMERS’ BRAND EQUITY PERCEPTIONS OF TRADITIONAL AND NON-TRADITIONAL BRANDS. PAP. 2017 Jun. 1;3(1):290-301. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.414

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to contact@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.