Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

EVALUATION OF CARBON FOOTPRINT FOR WOOD BASED PANEL INDUSTRY IN TURKEY

Year 2017, , 10 - 18, 30.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.564

Abstract

In wood-based panel industry, the importance of carbon footprint has
increased due to global warming and climate change all around the world. So
this topic has been studied extensively in the world, especially in developed
countries. Eventhough wood based panel industry is one of the most important
industry in Turkey there is not any comprehensive study in this field so this
study was planned to meet the requirement in industry which release a lot of
emissions to the environment. In recent years the use of wood-based panels such
as fiber board, particleboard, oriented strand board, plywood etc., have been
increased due to the fast growth in bulding trade in Turkey. The world’s
largest board producers are China, USA, Germany and Turkey respectively. This
charges the industry a great responsibility for the environment because
sustainable development is a development that meets the needs of the present
without making a concession the ability of future 
generations
to meet their own needs. From this perspective, it is essential to know the current
status of the sector concerning CO
2 footprint, energy footprint and
water footprint. This study is aimed to investigate one of the largest board
producer industry of Turkey whether clean production (less emission) is carried
out or not. Besides, it is aimed to present some improvements to decrease the
emission. Carbon footprint values are calculated as statistically with Tier
method during the particle board production, and Pareto anaysis method is used
for determine the footprint’ problem.
 
Consequently, a liveable environment will be provided and environmental
oriented production will be supported to contribute to these properties
  in the industry for this issue in the scope
of this research. Also, this study shall provide a general view and perception
for the importance of the carbon footprint in the industrial sector.



 

References

  • Akın, B.1996, “ISO 9000 Uygulamasında İşletmelerde İstatistik Proses Kontrol Teknikleri”, Istanbul: Bilim Teknik Yayınevi, pp 49-50.
  • Akın, B., Öztürk, E. 2005, “Istatistiksel Proses Kontrol Tekniklerinin Bilgisayar Ortamında Uygulanması”, VII.Ulusal Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sempozyumu Bildiriler CD, Istanbul, pp 1-15.
  • Atabey, T. 2013, “Karbon Ayak İzinin Hesaplanması: Diyarbakır Örneği”, Fırat Üniversitesi Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Elazığ.
  • Bergman, R., Taylor, A., Skog, K.E., Puettmann, M.E. 2014, “The Carbon Impacts of Wood Products”, Forests Products Journal Vol 64 No. 7, 14 October.
  • Best Available Techniques (BAT) 2014, “Reference Document for the Production of Wood-based Panels”
  • Calculating our carbon footprint convert kWh electricity to kg CO2; draft, Url-2 http://www.leicsgov.ukcalculating_our_carbon_footprint.pdf
  • Carbon Trust, 2007, “Carbon Footprint Measurement Methodolgy” (Draft) www.carbontrust.co.uk
  • Cetin, T., Colak, M., Yılmaz, S., Yılmaz, T., Korkmaz, Y. 2014, “The Scope and Extent of Extra Work Caused by Management and Workers’ Issues In The Turkish Furniture Industry”, Journal of Asian Scientific Research 4 (12): pp 729-740, Muğla.
  • Cravener, T.L., Roush, W.B., Jordan, H., 1993, “Pareto Assessment of Quality Control in Poultry Processing Plants”, Applied Poultry Science, 2: pp 297-302.
  • DEFRA,2010, biomass emission factors.
  • Federal Environment Agency, Brigitte Zletlow. lichtl Ethıcs& Brands, May 2011, “Environmental Standards In The Textile And Shoe Sector-A Guideline On The Basis Of The Brefs-Best Available Techniques Reference Documents Of The EU-Umwelt Bundes Amt”
  • Garcia, R., Freire, F., 2013, Carbon footprint of particleboard: a comparison between ISO/TS 14067, GHG Protocol, PAS 2050 and Climate Declaration.
  • Gitlow, H.S., Openheim, A.J., Oppenheim, R., Levine, D.M. 2005, “Quality Management”, Third Edition, McGrawHill, USA, pp 366-367.
  • Görener, A., Toker, K. 2013, “Quality Improvement in Manufacturing Process to Defective Products using Pareto Analysis and FMEA”, Beykent University Journal of Social Sciences-BUJSS Vol.6 No.2, ISSN:1307-5063, Istanbul.
  • Grubb and Ellis, 2007, “Meeting the Carbon Challenge: The Role of Commercial Real Estate Owners”, Users & Managers, Chicago.
  • Guidelines for Measuring and Managing CO2 emission from Freight Transport Operations, March 2011(draft) Url-1 http://www.cefic.org/Documents/IndustrySupport/Transport-and-Logistics/Best%20Practice%20Guidelines&20-%20General%20 Guidelines/CeficECTA%20Guidelines%20for%20measuring%20and%20managing%20CO2%20emissions%20from%20transport%20operation s%20Final%20,30.03.2011.pdf
  • Hammond, G. 2007, "Time to give due weight to the 'carbon footprint' issue". Nature 445(7125): 256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/445256b.
  • IPCC Climate Change, 2007: “Synthesis Report.Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)”, Geneva
  • IPCC, 2006, “Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Chapter 10: Emissions from livestock and manure management”, Retrieved from http://www.ipcc nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/4_10_Ch10_Livestock.pdf.
  • IPCC 2007 Revised 2007” IPCC Guideliness for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Revence Manual Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  • İlter, E.; Ok, K. 2007, “Ormancılık ve Orman Endüstrisinde Pazarlama İlkeleri ve Yönetimi” (Forestry and Forest Industry Marketing Principles and Management), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Leavengood, S. and Reeb, J.,2002, “Part 3: Pareto Analysis and Check Sheets, Performance excellence in the wood products industry Statistical Process Control”, EM 8771, January 2002.
  • Lelyveld, T., Woods, P., AECOM 2010, “Carbon emission factors for fuels -Methodology and values for 2013-2016”, 6 October 2010.
  • Lippke, B., Gustafson, R., Venditti, R., Steele, P., Volk, T.A., Oneil, E., Johnson, L.,Puettmann,M.E., Skog,K. 2012, “Comparing Life-Cycle Carbon and Energy Impacts for Biofuel, Wood Product, and Forest Management Alternatives” , Forest Products Journal Volt.62 (4): pp 247257.
  • Mahapatra, A.; Mitchell, C.P. 1997, “Sustainable development of non-timber forest products: implication for forest Management in India”, Forest Ecology and Management 94: pp 15–29.
  • Managers net, Pareto analysis( the 80:20 rule),(draft) Url-3 http://www.managers-net.com/paretoanalysis.html
  • Morşanu, C., Dumitraşcu, A., E., Ciobanu, V. 2011, “The Influence of Oak Raw Timber Defects on Decorative Veneer Cutting” , Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Series II Foresty Wood Industry Agricultural Food Engineering Vol 4(53) No. 2
  • Muthu, S.S. 2014, “Assessment of Carbon Footprint in Different Industrial Sectors”, Volume 1, Springer, Environemntal Issues in Logistics and Manufacturing, ISBN 978-981-4560-41-2, London.
  • Ok, K. 2005, “Idea Marketing in Forestry: Some Implications from the Turkish Forestry Experience”. Forest Policy and Economics 7(4): pp 493-500.
  • Özcan, S. 2001, “İstatistiksel Proses Kontrol Tekniklerinden Pareto Analizi ve Çimento Sanayiinde Bir Uygulama” , C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2 (2): pp 151-174.
  • Pekin, M., 2006, “Ulaştırma Sektöründen Kaynaklanan Sera Gazı Emisyonları Yüksek Lisans Tezi”, Haziran 2006, İTÜ
  • POST, 2006, "Carbon footprint of electricity generation". POSTnote 268, October 2006, Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, London, UK. http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/postp n268.pdf.
  • Turanlı, A. 2015, “Estimation of carbon footprint: A case study for Middle East Technical University Mastar Thesis” , May 2015, Middle East Technical University.
  • UN, 1998, “Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change”, United Nations.
  • Wackernagel, M., and Rees, W. 1996, “Urban ecological footprints Why cities cannot be sustainable-And why they are a key to sustainability”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review Volume 16, Issues 4-6, July-November 1996, pp223-248.
  • What is a Carbon Footprint? Report presented to The Swedish Forest Industries Federation and Timcon by The Edinburg Centre for Carbon Management ECCM-EM-483-2007, February 2008 (Draft) http://www.timcon.orgCarbonCalculatorCarbon%20Footprint.pdf Wiedmann, T., and Minx, J. 2007,” A Definition of ‘Carbon Footprint’ “, ISA UK Research Report 07-01, June 2007.
  • Yildirim, T., Candan, Z. and Korkut.S. 2014, “Wood-Based Panels Industry In Turkey: Future Raw Material Challenges And Suggestions. Maderas. Ciencia y tecnología 16 (2): pp 175-186.
Year 2017, , 10 - 18, 30.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.564

Abstract

References

  • Akın, B.1996, “ISO 9000 Uygulamasında İşletmelerde İstatistik Proses Kontrol Teknikleri”, Istanbul: Bilim Teknik Yayınevi, pp 49-50.
  • Akın, B., Öztürk, E. 2005, “Istatistiksel Proses Kontrol Tekniklerinin Bilgisayar Ortamında Uygulanması”, VII.Ulusal Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sempozyumu Bildiriler CD, Istanbul, pp 1-15.
  • Atabey, T. 2013, “Karbon Ayak İzinin Hesaplanması: Diyarbakır Örneği”, Fırat Üniversitesi Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Elazığ.
  • Bergman, R., Taylor, A., Skog, K.E., Puettmann, M.E. 2014, “The Carbon Impacts of Wood Products”, Forests Products Journal Vol 64 No. 7, 14 October.
  • Best Available Techniques (BAT) 2014, “Reference Document for the Production of Wood-based Panels”
  • Calculating our carbon footprint convert kWh electricity to kg CO2; draft, Url-2 http://www.leicsgov.ukcalculating_our_carbon_footprint.pdf
  • Carbon Trust, 2007, “Carbon Footprint Measurement Methodolgy” (Draft) www.carbontrust.co.uk
  • Cetin, T., Colak, M., Yılmaz, S., Yılmaz, T., Korkmaz, Y. 2014, “The Scope and Extent of Extra Work Caused by Management and Workers’ Issues In The Turkish Furniture Industry”, Journal of Asian Scientific Research 4 (12): pp 729-740, Muğla.
  • Cravener, T.L., Roush, W.B., Jordan, H., 1993, “Pareto Assessment of Quality Control in Poultry Processing Plants”, Applied Poultry Science, 2: pp 297-302.
  • DEFRA,2010, biomass emission factors.
  • Federal Environment Agency, Brigitte Zletlow. lichtl Ethıcs& Brands, May 2011, “Environmental Standards In The Textile And Shoe Sector-A Guideline On The Basis Of The Brefs-Best Available Techniques Reference Documents Of The EU-Umwelt Bundes Amt”
  • Garcia, R., Freire, F., 2013, Carbon footprint of particleboard: a comparison between ISO/TS 14067, GHG Protocol, PAS 2050 and Climate Declaration.
  • Gitlow, H.S., Openheim, A.J., Oppenheim, R., Levine, D.M. 2005, “Quality Management”, Third Edition, McGrawHill, USA, pp 366-367.
  • Görener, A., Toker, K. 2013, “Quality Improvement in Manufacturing Process to Defective Products using Pareto Analysis and FMEA”, Beykent University Journal of Social Sciences-BUJSS Vol.6 No.2, ISSN:1307-5063, Istanbul.
  • Grubb and Ellis, 2007, “Meeting the Carbon Challenge: The Role of Commercial Real Estate Owners”, Users & Managers, Chicago.
  • Guidelines for Measuring and Managing CO2 emission from Freight Transport Operations, March 2011(draft) Url-1 http://www.cefic.org/Documents/IndustrySupport/Transport-and-Logistics/Best%20Practice%20Guidelines&20-%20General%20 Guidelines/CeficECTA%20Guidelines%20for%20measuring%20and%20managing%20CO2%20emissions%20from%20transport%20operation s%20Final%20,30.03.2011.pdf
  • Hammond, G. 2007, "Time to give due weight to the 'carbon footprint' issue". Nature 445(7125): 256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/445256b.
  • IPCC Climate Change, 2007: “Synthesis Report.Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)”, Geneva
  • IPCC, 2006, “Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Chapter 10: Emissions from livestock and manure management”, Retrieved from http://www.ipcc nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/4_10_Ch10_Livestock.pdf.
  • IPCC 2007 Revised 2007” IPCC Guideliness for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Revence Manual Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  • İlter, E.; Ok, K. 2007, “Ormancılık ve Orman Endüstrisinde Pazarlama İlkeleri ve Yönetimi” (Forestry and Forest Industry Marketing Principles and Management), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Leavengood, S. and Reeb, J.,2002, “Part 3: Pareto Analysis and Check Sheets, Performance excellence in the wood products industry Statistical Process Control”, EM 8771, January 2002.
  • Lelyveld, T., Woods, P., AECOM 2010, “Carbon emission factors for fuels -Methodology and values for 2013-2016”, 6 October 2010.
  • Lippke, B., Gustafson, R., Venditti, R., Steele, P., Volk, T.A., Oneil, E., Johnson, L.,Puettmann,M.E., Skog,K. 2012, “Comparing Life-Cycle Carbon and Energy Impacts for Biofuel, Wood Product, and Forest Management Alternatives” , Forest Products Journal Volt.62 (4): pp 247257.
  • Mahapatra, A.; Mitchell, C.P. 1997, “Sustainable development of non-timber forest products: implication for forest Management in India”, Forest Ecology and Management 94: pp 15–29.
  • Managers net, Pareto analysis( the 80:20 rule),(draft) Url-3 http://www.managers-net.com/paretoanalysis.html
  • Morşanu, C., Dumitraşcu, A., E., Ciobanu, V. 2011, “The Influence of Oak Raw Timber Defects on Decorative Veneer Cutting” , Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Series II Foresty Wood Industry Agricultural Food Engineering Vol 4(53) No. 2
  • Muthu, S.S. 2014, “Assessment of Carbon Footprint in Different Industrial Sectors”, Volume 1, Springer, Environemntal Issues in Logistics and Manufacturing, ISBN 978-981-4560-41-2, London.
  • Ok, K. 2005, “Idea Marketing in Forestry: Some Implications from the Turkish Forestry Experience”. Forest Policy and Economics 7(4): pp 493-500.
  • Özcan, S. 2001, “İstatistiksel Proses Kontrol Tekniklerinden Pareto Analizi ve Çimento Sanayiinde Bir Uygulama” , C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2 (2): pp 151-174.
  • Pekin, M., 2006, “Ulaştırma Sektöründen Kaynaklanan Sera Gazı Emisyonları Yüksek Lisans Tezi”, Haziran 2006, İTÜ
  • POST, 2006, "Carbon footprint of electricity generation". POSTnote 268, October 2006, Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, London, UK. http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/postp n268.pdf.
  • Turanlı, A. 2015, “Estimation of carbon footprint: A case study for Middle East Technical University Mastar Thesis” , May 2015, Middle East Technical University.
  • UN, 1998, “Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change”, United Nations.
  • Wackernagel, M., and Rees, W. 1996, “Urban ecological footprints Why cities cannot be sustainable-And why they are a key to sustainability”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review Volume 16, Issues 4-6, July-November 1996, pp223-248.
  • What is a Carbon Footprint? Report presented to The Swedish Forest Industries Federation and Timcon by The Edinburg Centre for Carbon Management ECCM-EM-483-2007, February 2008 (Draft) http://www.timcon.orgCarbonCalculatorCarbon%20Footprint.pdf Wiedmann, T., and Minx, J. 2007,” A Definition of ‘Carbon Footprint’ “, ISA UK Research Report 07-01, June 2007.
  • Yildirim, T., Candan, Z. and Korkut.S. 2014, “Wood-Based Panels Industry In Turkey: Future Raw Material Challenges And Suggestions. Maderas. Ciencia y tecnología 16 (2): pp 175-186.
There are 37 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mehtap Erdil This is me

Nural Yilgor

Yigit Gungor This is me

Publication Date June 30, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017

Cite

APA Erdil, M., Yilgor, N., & Gungor, Y. (2017). EVALUATION OF CARBON FOOTPRINT FOR WOOD BASED PANEL INDUSTRY IN TURKEY. PressAcademia Procedia, 5(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.564
AMA Erdil M, Yilgor N, Gungor Y. EVALUATION OF CARBON FOOTPRINT FOR WOOD BASED PANEL INDUSTRY IN TURKEY. PAP. June 2017;5(1):10-18. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.564
Chicago Erdil, Mehtap, Nural Yilgor, and Yigit Gungor. “EVALUATION OF CARBON FOOTPRINT FOR WOOD BASED PANEL INDUSTRY IN TURKEY”. PressAcademia Procedia 5, no. 1 (June 2017): 10-18. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.564.
EndNote Erdil M, Yilgor N, Gungor Y (June 1, 2017) EVALUATION OF CARBON FOOTPRINT FOR WOOD BASED PANEL INDUSTRY IN TURKEY. PressAcademia Procedia 5 1 10–18.
IEEE M. Erdil, N. Yilgor, and Y. Gungor, “EVALUATION OF CARBON FOOTPRINT FOR WOOD BASED PANEL INDUSTRY IN TURKEY”, PAP, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.564.
ISNAD Erdil, Mehtap et al. “EVALUATION OF CARBON FOOTPRINT FOR WOOD BASED PANEL INDUSTRY IN TURKEY”. PressAcademia Procedia 5/1 (June 2017), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.564.
JAMA Erdil M, Yilgor N, Gungor Y. EVALUATION OF CARBON FOOTPRINT FOR WOOD BASED PANEL INDUSTRY IN TURKEY. PAP. 2017;5:10–18.
MLA Erdil, Mehtap et al. “EVALUATION OF CARBON FOOTPRINT FOR WOOD BASED PANEL INDUSTRY IN TURKEY”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 5, no. 1, 2017, pp. 10-18, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.564.
Vancouver Erdil M, Yilgor N, Gungor Y. EVALUATION OF CARBON FOOTPRINT FOR WOOD BASED PANEL INDUSTRY IN TURKEY. PAP. 2017;5(1):10-8.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.