Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES FOR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION: AN EXAMPLE FOR TURKEY

Year 2017, , 163 - 168, 30.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.585

Abstract

Communication
is the way for people exchanging information with each other by using various
tools. Electronic communication or Ecommunication is the process of sending,
receiving and processing information or messages electronically. Electronic
communication that is closely related to the development levels of countries,
has made considerable progress especially in terms technology, innovation and
entrepreneur. In this study, it is investigated whether electronic
communication in Turkey is used effectively using the data published by
Information and Communication Technologies Authority. For this purpose, different
decision making techniques in data mining have been used. Obtained results are
discussed.



 

References

  • Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-Making under Fuzzy Environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol: 114.
  • Clementine User Guide, https://web.kku.ac.th/wichuda/DMining/ClementineUsersGuide_11.1.pdf
  • Hokkanen, J. and P. Salminen (1997), ELECTRE III and IV decision aids in an environmental problem, Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, 6, 215-226.
  • Hwang, C. L. ve Yoon, K., Multiple Attribute Decision Making: A State of the Art Survey, Springer-Verlag, New York 1981.
  • Roy, B. (1968), Classement et choix en présence de critères multiples (la méthode ELECTRE), RIRO, 8, 57-75.
  • Roy, B. (1991), The outranking approach and the foundation of ELECTRE methods, Theory and Decision, 31, 49-73.
  • Roy, B., M. Présent and D. Silhol (1986), A programming method for determining which Paris Metro stations should be renovated, European Journal of Operational Research, 24, 318- 334.
  • http://www.meammarketing.com/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-electronic-communication/
  • Feldman, M. S.; Sarbaugh-Thompson, M. Information Infrastructure and Policy, v5 n1 p1-14 Jul 1996
  • Büyüközkan, Gülçin, and Sezin Güleryüz. "Multi Criteria Group Decision Making Approach for Smart Phone Selection Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS." International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 9.4 (2016): 709-725.
  • Ertugrul, Irfan, and Tayfun Oztas. "Business mobile-line selection in Turkey by using fuzzy TOPSIS, one of the multi-criteria decision methods." Procedia Computer Science 31 (2014): 40-47.
  • Petrović, Marijana, et al. "An ELECTRE-based decision aid tool for stepwise benchmarking: An application over EU Digital Agenda targets." Decision Support Systems 59 (2014): 230-241.
  • Kaya, Tolga, and Cengiz Kahraman. "A fuzzy approach to e-banking website quality assessment based on an integrated AHP-ELECTRE method." Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17.2 (2011): 313-334.
  • CHEN, Ya-ding, Shao-qian LI, and Yu-fan CHENG. "Effectiveness Evaluation of Integrated Anti-Jamming for Wireless Communication System." Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China 39.3 (2010): 196-199.
  • Asghari, Fatemeh, et al. "A fuzzy ELECTRE approach for evaluating mobile payment business models." Management of e-Commerce and eGovernment (ICMeCG), 2010 Fourth International Conference on. IEEE, 2010.
Year 2017, , 163 - 168, 30.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.585

Abstract

References

  • Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-Making under Fuzzy Environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol: 114.
  • Clementine User Guide, https://web.kku.ac.th/wichuda/DMining/ClementineUsersGuide_11.1.pdf
  • Hokkanen, J. and P. Salminen (1997), ELECTRE III and IV decision aids in an environmental problem, Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, 6, 215-226.
  • Hwang, C. L. ve Yoon, K., Multiple Attribute Decision Making: A State of the Art Survey, Springer-Verlag, New York 1981.
  • Roy, B. (1968), Classement et choix en présence de critères multiples (la méthode ELECTRE), RIRO, 8, 57-75.
  • Roy, B. (1991), The outranking approach and the foundation of ELECTRE methods, Theory and Decision, 31, 49-73.
  • Roy, B., M. Présent and D. Silhol (1986), A programming method for determining which Paris Metro stations should be renovated, European Journal of Operational Research, 24, 318- 334.
  • http://www.meammarketing.com/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-electronic-communication/
  • Feldman, M. S.; Sarbaugh-Thompson, M. Information Infrastructure and Policy, v5 n1 p1-14 Jul 1996
  • Büyüközkan, Gülçin, and Sezin Güleryüz. "Multi Criteria Group Decision Making Approach for Smart Phone Selection Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS." International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 9.4 (2016): 709-725.
  • Ertugrul, Irfan, and Tayfun Oztas. "Business mobile-line selection in Turkey by using fuzzy TOPSIS, one of the multi-criteria decision methods." Procedia Computer Science 31 (2014): 40-47.
  • Petrović, Marijana, et al. "An ELECTRE-based decision aid tool for stepwise benchmarking: An application over EU Digital Agenda targets." Decision Support Systems 59 (2014): 230-241.
  • Kaya, Tolga, and Cengiz Kahraman. "A fuzzy approach to e-banking website quality assessment based on an integrated AHP-ELECTRE method." Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17.2 (2011): 313-334.
  • CHEN, Ya-ding, Shao-qian LI, and Yu-fan CHENG. "Effectiveness Evaluation of Integrated Anti-Jamming for Wireless Communication System." Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China 39.3 (2010): 196-199.
  • Asghari, Fatemeh, et al. "A fuzzy ELECTRE approach for evaluating mobile payment business models." Management of e-Commerce and eGovernment (ICMeCG), 2010 Fourth International Conference on. IEEE, 2010.
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Semra Erbolat Tasabat

Olgun Aydin This is me

Publication Date June 30, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017

Cite

APA Erbolat Tasabat, S., & Aydin, O. (2017). DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES FOR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION: AN EXAMPLE FOR TURKEY. PressAcademia Procedia, 5(1), 163-168. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.585
AMA Erbolat Tasabat S, Aydin O. DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES FOR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION: AN EXAMPLE FOR TURKEY. PAP. June 2017;5(1):163-168. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.585
Chicago Erbolat Tasabat, Semra, and Olgun Aydin. “DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES FOR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION: AN EXAMPLE FOR TURKEY”. PressAcademia Procedia 5, no. 1 (June 2017): 163-68. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.585.
EndNote Erbolat Tasabat S, Aydin O (June 1, 2017) DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES FOR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION: AN EXAMPLE FOR TURKEY. PressAcademia Procedia 5 1 163–168.
IEEE S. Erbolat Tasabat and O. Aydin, “DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES FOR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION: AN EXAMPLE FOR TURKEY”, PAP, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 163–168, 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.585.
ISNAD Erbolat Tasabat, Semra - Aydin, Olgun. “DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES FOR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION: AN EXAMPLE FOR TURKEY”. PressAcademia Procedia 5/1 (June 2017), 163-168. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.585.
JAMA Erbolat Tasabat S, Aydin O. DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES FOR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION: AN EXAMPLE FOR TURKEY. PAP. 2017;5:163–168.
MLA Erbolat Tasabat, Semra and Olgun Aydin. “DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES FOR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION: AN EXAMPLE FOR TURKEY”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 5, no. 1, 2017, pp. 163-8, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.585.
Vancouver Erbolat Tasabat S, Aydin O. DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES FOR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION: AN EXAMPLE FOR TURKEY. PAP. 2017;5(1):163-8.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.