SAFETY SHOES WEARER'S COMFORT PERCEPTION AND EFFECTS AMONG MANUFACTURING EMPLOYEES

Year 2017, , 270 - 273, 30.06.2017

Baba Md Deros Mohd İezalman Ab Rahman Nurul Huda Baba Ahmed Rithauddeen Yusof

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.599

Abstract

This study investigates ergonomic
problems faced by manufacturing employees due to wearing inappropriate safety
shoes. A total of 30 survey respondents was recruited based on the shoes they
wear. Pedar-X was used in the experiment to measure the pressure that acts on
the wearer’ feet. Survey results showed the wearer’ experienced the highest
pain with the frequency of 80% for right and 83.33% for the left heel for
wearing safety shoes two to three times a week. Meanwhile, Pedar-X recorded
average peak pressure, force and surface area: Amporlo, 90.53 kPa, 259.57 N,
and 67.74 cm2; Land Master, 75.07 kPa, 273.79 N and 72.65 cm2; Jack Parcell
ordinary flat, 67.85 kPa, 170.68 N and 52.08 cm2 respectively. It was found
strain on the front and middle of the feet were lowest. Meanwhile, the back
foot, which locates the heel recorded the highest pressure value of 185 kPa as
a result of wearing inappropriate safety shoes. 

Keywords

Peak pressure, force, surface area, foot, comfort

References

• Cham, R., Redfern, M.S., 2001, “Effect of flooring on standing comfort and fatigue, Human Factors”, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 381–391.
• DeVocht, J.W., Wilder, D.G., Bandstra, E.R., Spratt, K.F., 2006, “Biomechanical evaluation of four different mattresses”, Appl. Ergon., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 297–304.
• Dobson, J.A., Riddiford-Harland, D. L., Bell, A.F. & Steele, J.R. 2017, “Effect of work boot type on work footwear habits, lower limb pain and perceptions of work boot fit and comfort in underground coal miners”, Applied Ergonomics, vol. 60, pp. 146-153.
• Gardner, L.I., Dziados, J.E., Jones, B.H., 1988, “Prevention of lower extremity stress fractures: a controlled trial of a shock absorbent insole”, Am. J. Public Health, vol. 78, pp. 1563–1567.
• Hodge, M.C., Bach, T.M., Carter, G.M., 1999. “Orthotic management of plantar pressure and pain in rheumatoid arthritis, Clin. Biomech, vol. 14, pp. 567–575.
• Hong, W. H., Lee, Y. H., Chen, H. C., Pei, Y. C., & Wu, C. Y. 2005, “Influence of heel height and shoe insert on comfort perception and biomechanical performance of young female adults during walking. Foot & ankle international, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1042-1048.
• Irzmańska, E. 2014, “Footware use at workplace and recomendations for the improvement of its functionality and hygiene”, AUTEX Research Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 89-94.
• ISO 20344, 2012. Personal Protective Equipment. Test Methods for Footwear.
• Kelaher, D., Mirka, G.A., Dudziak, K.Q., 2000. Effects of semi-rigid arch-support orthotics: an investigation with potential ergonomic implications. Appl. Ergon. 31 (5), 515–522.
• King, P.M., 2002, “A comparison of the effects of floor mats and shoe in-soles on standing fatigue”, Appl. Ergon., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 477– 484.
• Koradecka D. 2012, “Use of Personal Protective Equipment in the Workplace. In: Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics”, USA: John Wiley &Sons Press 2012, pp. 895-910.
• Koradecka, D., 2010. Handbook of Occupational Safety and Health. CRP Press Taylor & Francis Group, USA.
• Koradecka, D., Konarska, M., 2002, “Advance in physiology and ergonomics and their impact on th hygiene of work”, Medycyna Pracy (Occup. Med. – in Polish), vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 15-21.
• Na, S., Lim, S., Choi, H.S., Chung, M.K., 2005, “Evaluation of driver’s discomfort and postural change using dynamic body pressure distribution”, Int. J. Ind. Ergon, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1085–1096.
• Ramanathan, A. K., Kiran, P., Arnold, G. P., Wang, W., & Abboud, R. J., 2010, “Repeatability of the Pedar-X® in-shoe pressure measuring system, Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 70-73.
• Witana, C. P., Goonetilleke, R. S., Xiong, S., & Au, E. Y., 2009, “Effects of surface characteristics on the plantar shape of feet and subjects’ perceived sensations”, Applied Ergonomics, vo. 40, no. 2, pp. 267-279.