Abstract
References
- de Berti, G., “Mandatory mediation: the Italian experience, two years on”, http://www.internationallawoffice.com/Newsletters/Arbitration-ADR/I (Erişim tarihi: 01.03.2017).
- Drummond, I., “Should mediation be mandatory?”, http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=68019975-f314-4d43-8966483af9e95667 (Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2017).
- Germane, C., Johnson, M., Lemon, N., (2013), “Mandatory Custody Mediation and Joint Custody Orders in California: The Danger for Victims of Domestic Violence”, Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, Vol. 1, No. 1.
- Hanks, M., (2012), “Perspectives On Mandatory Mediation” , UNSW Law Journal Volume 35(3).
- Hardy, W., “Mandatory Mediation”, http://willhardy.com.au/legal-essays/mandatory-mediation/view/ (Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2017).
- Hensler, D.R., (2010), “USA National Report“, The Costs and Funding of Civil Litigation (Editors: C. Hodges, S. Vogenauer, M. Tulibacka), Oxford.
- Maxeiner, J.R., (2012), “The American ‘Rule’: Assuring the Lion His Share”, Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure (Editor: M. Reimann), New York.
- Morek, R., “Mandatory Mediation in Italy – Reloaded”, http://kluwermediationblog.com/2013/10/09/mandatory-mediation-in-italyreloaded/ (Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2017).
- Özbek, M., (2013), Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü, 3. Baskı, Ankara.
- Quek, D., (2010), “Mandatory Mediation: An Oxymoron? Examining The Feasibility Of Implementing A Court-Mandated Mediation Program”, Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 11, No. 2.
- Svatos, M., “Mandatory Mediation Strikes Back”, http://www.mediate.com/articles/SvatosM1.cfm (Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2017).
- Winestone, J., “Mandatory Mediation: A Comparative Review of How Legislatures in California and Ontario are Mandating the Peacemaking Process In Their Adversarial Systems”, http://www.mediate.com/articles/WinestoneJ4.cfm (Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2017).
Abstract
It is now a
well established fact that the number of disputes brought before courts and
therefore the caseload of the courts are extremely high in Turkey. Labour
disputes comprise a large portion of said disputes. Labour disputes, which
should be dealt quickly due to their nature, might be dragged on for years in
courts owing to the courts’
extraordinary docket sizes. With the aim to reduce the burden on courts
and promote amicable dispute resolution, the Ministry of Justice introduced the
concept of mandatory mediation in certain labour disputes as part of the Labour
Courts Law Draft. Early success statistics regarding modern mediation, which is
in use in Turkey since 2013, was a factor in strengthening this notion.
However, the idea of a mandatory use of mediation is an international subject
of debate, since it must be established that whether this complies with its
nature. This debate, as well as the current state of mediation in Turkey and
whether this state may warrant mandatory mediation is discussed in this paper.
Keywords
References
- de Berti, G., “Mandatory mediation: the Italian experience, two years on”, http://www.internationallawoffice.com/Newsletters/Arbitration-ADR/I (Erişim tarihi: 01.03.2017).
- Drummond, I., “Should mediation be mandatory?”, http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=68019975-f314-4d43-8966483af9e95667 (Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2017).
- Germane, C., Johnson, M., Lemon, N., (2013), “Mandatory Custody Mediation and Joint Custody Orders in California: The Danger for Victims of Domestic Violence”, Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, Vol. 1, No. 1.
- Hanks, M., (2012), “Perspectives On Mandatory Mediation” , UNSW Law Journal Volume 35(3).
- Hardy, W., “Mandatory Mediation”, http://willhardy.com.au/legal-essays/mandatory-mediation/view/ (Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2017).
- Hensler, D.R., (2010), “USA National Report“, The Costs and Funding of Civil Litigation (Editors: C. Hodges, S. Vogenauer, M. Tulibacka), Oxford.
- Maxeiner, J.R., (2012), “The American ‘Rule’: Assuring the Lion His Share”, Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure (Editor: M. Reimann), New York.
- Morek, R., “Mandatory Mediation in Italy – Reloaded”, http://kluwermediationblog.com/2013/10/09/mandatory-mediation-in-italyreloaded/ (Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2017).
- Özbek, M., (2013), Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü, 3. Baskı, Ankara.
- Quek, D., (2010), “Mandatory Mediation: An Oxymoron? Examining The Feasibility Of Implementing A Court-Mandated Mediation Program”, Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 11, No. 2.
- Svatos, M., “Mandatory Mediation Strikes Back”, http://www.mediate.com/articles/SvatosM1.cfm (Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2017).
- Winestone, J., “Mandatory Mediation: A Comparative Review of How Legislatures in California and Ontario are Mandating the Peacemaking Process In Their Adversarial Systems”, http://www.mediate.com/articles/WinestoneJ4.cfm (Erişim tarihi: 14.02.2017).
Details
| Journal Section | Articles |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 30, 2017 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2017 Volume: 3 Issue: 1 |
Cite
PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.
PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants.
PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.
PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing.
Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.