THE EFFECT OF AUTHENTIC LEADERSHIP ON ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING PROVIDING ORGANIZATION THE ABILITY TO ADAPT QUICKLY AND CONVENIENTLY TO CHANGING CIRCUMSTANCES
Abstract
Since the beginning of the 21st century business world and society in
general is changing rapidly as never before. The uncertainty of the new
competitive environment is dynamic, short-term, uncertain and replacing the
natural foundations of the competition.
Organizations have to cope with all pressures and have to find their
success path through the increasingly complex environment. Organizational
learning is one of the crucial processes that facilitate to adapt quickly and
conveniently to changing circumstances and enhance survival chance of the
organization. Leaders are expected to encourage organizational learning to
attain competitive advantage. Organizational learning and transformation
affected by positive behaviors of a leader and leads to affirmative upward
spirals on them. Previous research represent that organizational learning is
associated with different kinds of leadership styles. However, in literature
there is not any encountered relationship between Organizational Learning and
Authentic Leadership style. The aim of this study is to provide an
understanding of the relationship between Organizational Learning and Authentic
Leadership style. This research bears the distinction of being the first study
that argues the relationship between Authentic Leadership and Organizational
Learning; therefore it is an important contribution to the relevant literature
in this area. Study was conducted in private sector organizations that operate
in banking and insurance sector. The sample of the study is consisted of
200 white collar employees. The results indicated that Authentic Leadership
significantly has influence on Organizational Learning.
Keywords
References
- Arago´n-Correa. J. A.. Garcı´a-Morales. V. J.. & Cordo´n-Pozo. E. (2007). Leadership and organizational learning's role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain. Industrial Marketing Management. vol. 36 pp. 349 – 359.
- Argyris. C.. & Schön. D. A. (1996). Organizational Learning II Theory. Method and Practice. United States: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Inc.
- Ataman. G. (2002). İşletme Yönetimi Temel Kavramlar ve Yeni Yaklaşımlar . İstanbul: Türkmen Kitabevi.
- Avolio. B. J.. & Gardner. W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly. Vol 16 pp.315–338.
- Avolio. B. J.. & Gardner. W. L. (2005). Authentic Leadership Development: Getting to the Root of Positive Forms of Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly. 16. 315-338.
- Avolio. B. J.. Luthans. F.. & Walumbwa. F. O. (2004). Authentic Leadership: Theory Building for Veritable Sustained Performance. Working Paper. Gallup Leadership Institute: University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
- Avolio. B. J.. O.Walumbwa. F.. & J.Weber. T. (2009). Leadership: Current Theories. Research. and Future Directions. Annual Review of Psychology. 60:421-449.
- Avolio. B. J.. Walumbwa. F.. & Weber. T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current Theories. Research and Future Directions. The Annual Review of Psychology. 421-449.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
June 30, 2017
Submission Date
March 19, 2017
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2017 Volume: 3 Number: 1