Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

PEER COMMUNICATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA AND EFFECT ON PURCHASE INTENTION

Year 2017, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 640 - 645, 30.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.640

Abstract

Social media started a new market and became an
essential element of marketing as individuals share their thoughts, experiences
and opinions globally. Social media effects consumers’ thoughts about
unfamiliar brands more than ever now. The comments and opinions of peers about
product/services on social media affects purchase intentions of the consumers.
The aim of this study is to examine the effect of peer communication on social
media over attitudes towards products and purchase intention. Previous studies
mostly have concentrated on the effects of firm communication over consumers’
purchase intention. In communication the effect of virtual world has increased
significantly on the other hand personal relations and peer communication still
maintains its importance. In academy and business world research and investment
on social media increases. Social media usage of the business world aims the
final result of purchase intention. In this study also a model leading to
purchase intention is examines. In the study peer group identification, peer
communication, attitude towards product and purchase intention through the
utilization of scales by Algesheimer, Dholakia and Hermann (2005), Moschis and
Churchill (1978), Crites, Fabrigar and Petty (1994) and Houlahan and Gabriel
(1975). According to the results of the study social media peer identification,
identification the group increases purchase based peer communication. 

References

  • Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Herrmann, A. (2005). The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of marketing, 69(3), 19-34.
  • Baird, C. H., & Parasnis, G. (2011). From Social Media to Social Customer Relationship Management. Strategy & Leadership,, 30-37.
  • Brim, Orville Gilbert, and Stanton Wheeler. Socialization after childhood: Two essays. J. Wiley, 1966.
  • Bush, A. J., Smith, R., & Martin, C. (1999). The influence of consumer socialization variables on attitude toward advertising: A comparison of African-Americans and Caucasians. Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 13-24.
  • Churchill, G. A. and Moschis G. P. (1979). Television and ınterpersonal ınfluences on adolescent consumer learning. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 23-35.
  • Crites Jr, S. L., Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Measuring the affective and cognitive properties of attitudes: Conceptual and methodological issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(6), 619-634.
  • De Bruyn, A., & Lilien, G. L. (2008). A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence through viral marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(3), 151-163.
  • Gupta, G. (2013). Assessing the Influence of Social Media on Consumers' Purchase Intentions. Asia-Pacific Marketing Review, 31-39.
  • Hameed, B. (2011). Social media usage exploding amongst fortune 500 companies. Social Times. https://www.megesoft.com.tr/2016-dunyada-turkiyede-kullanim-istatistikleri/
  • Isler, L., Popper, E. and Ward, S. (1987). Children’s purchase requests and parental responses: result from a diary study. Journal of Advertising Research, 27, 28-39.
  • Kozinets, R., Wojnicki, A. C., Wilner, S. J., & Valck, K. D. (2010). Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities. Journal of Marketing, 71-89.
  • Lueg, J. E., & Finney, R. Z. (2007). Interpersonal communication in the consumer socialization process: scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(1), 25-39.
  • Lueg, J. E., Ponder, N., Beatty, S. E., & Capella, M. (2006). Teenagers’ use of alternative shopping channels: A consumer socialization perspective. Journal of Retailing, 137-153.
  • Moschis , G. P., & Churchill , G. A. (1978). Consumer Socialization: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 599609.
  • Moschis, G. P., and Moore, R. L. (1979). Decision making among the young: A socialization perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 101-112.
  • Naylor, R. W., Lamberton, C. P., & West, P. M. (2012). Beyond the “like” button: the impact of mere virtual presence on brand evaluations and purchase intentions in social media settings. Journal of Marketing, 105-120.
  • Olbrich, R., & Holsing, C. (2011). Modeling consumer purchasing behavior in social shopping communities with clickstream data. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15–40.
  • Shin, S. (2008). Understanding purchasing behaviors in a virtual economy: Consumer behavior involving virtual currency in Web 2.0 communities. Interacting with Computers, 433-446.
  • Shim, S., & Gehrt, K. C. (1996). Hispanic and Native American adolescents: An exploratory study of their approach to shopping. Journal of Retailing, 72(3), 307-324.
  • Sin, S. S., Nor, K. M., & Al-Agaga, A. M. (2012). Factors Affecting Malaysian Young Consumers' Online Purchase Intention in Social Media Websites. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 326-333.
  • Smith, D., Menon, S., & Sivakumar, K. (2005). Online peer and editorial recommendations, trust, and choice in virtual markets. Journal of interactive marketing, 19(3), 15-37.
  • Südaş, H. D., & Töge, B. Sosyal Ağlarda Tüketim Temelli Akran İletişiminin İncelenmesi: Adana İlinde Bir Uygulama. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 309-327
  • Taylor, J. W., Houlahan, J. J., & Gabriel, A. C. (1975). The purchase intention question in new product development: a field test. The Journal of Marketing, 90-92.
  • Trusov, M, M., Bucklin, R. E., & Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an Internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 90–102.
  • Ülger, G.(2012). Siber alemde çocukluğun yeniden üretimi. (Ed.) Sosyal Medya Akademi, İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
  • Valkenburg, P. M. & Buijen, M. (2005). Identifying determinants of young children’s brand awareness: Television, parents and peers. Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 456-468.
  • Wang, X. Yu, C. & Wei, Y. (2012). Social media peer communication and impacts on purchase intentions: A consumer socialization framework. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26, 198-208.
  • Ward, S. (1974). Consumer Socialization. Consumer Socialization, 1-16.
  • Xie, K., & Lee, Y. J. (2015). Social Media and Brand Purchase: Quantifying the Effects of Exposures to Earned and Owned Social Media Activities in a Two-Stage Decision Making Model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 204-238.
  • Zhang, J., & Daugherty, T. (2009). Third-person effect and social networking: implications for online marketing and word-of-mouth communication. American Journal of Business, 24(2), 53-64.
Year 2017, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 640 - 645, 30.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.640

Abstract

References

  • Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Herrmann, A. (2005). The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of marketing, 69(3), 19-34.
  • Baird, C. H., & Parasnis, G. (2011). From Social Media to Social Customer Relationship Management. Strategy & Leadership,, 30-37.
  • Brim, Orville Gilbert, and Stanton Wheeler. Socialization after childhood: Two essays. J. Wiley, 1966.
  • Bush, A. J., Smith, R., & Martin, C. (1999). The influence of consumer socialization variables on attitude toward advertising: A comparison of African-Americans and Caucasians. Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 13-24.
  • Churchill, G. A. and Moschis G. P. (1979). Television and ınterpersonal ınfluences on adolescent consumer learning. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 23-35.
  • Crites Jr, S. L., Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Measuring the affective and cognitive properties of attitudes: Conceptual and methodological issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(6), 619-634.
  • De Bruyn, A., & Lilien, G. L. (2008). A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence through viral marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(3), 151-163.
  • Gupta, G. (2013). Assessing the Influence of Social Media on Consumers' Purchase Intentions. Asia-Pacific Marketing Review, 31-39.
  • Hameed, B. (2011). Social media usage exploding amongst fortune 500 companies. Social Times. https://www.megesoft.com.tr/2016-dunyada-turkiyede-kullanim-istatistikleri/
  • Isler, L., Popper, E. and Ward, S. (1987). Children’s purchase requests and parental responses: result from a diary study. Journal of Advertising Research, 27, 28-39.
  • Kozinets, R., Wojnicki, A. C., Wilner, S. J., & Valck, K. D. (2010). Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities. Journal of Marketing, 71-89.
  • Lueg, J. E., & Finney, R. Z. (2007). Interpersonal communication in the consumer socialization process: scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(1), 25-39.
  • Lueg, J. E., Ponder, N., Beatty, S. E., & Capella, M. (2006). Teenagers’ use of alternative shopping channels: A consumer socialization perspective. Journal of Retailing, 137-153.
  • Moschis , G. P., & Churchill , G. A. (1978). Consumer Socialization: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 599609.
  • Moschis, G. P., and Moore, R. L. (1979). Decision making among the young: A socialization perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 101-112.
  • Naylor, R. W., Lamberton, C. P., & West, P. M. (2012). Beyond the “like” button: the impact of mere virtual presence on brand evaluations and purchase intentions in social media settings. Journal of Marketing, 105-120.
  • Olbrich, R., & Holsing, C. (2011). Modeling consumer purchasing behavior in social shopping communities with clickstream data. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15–40.
  • Shin, S. (2008). Understanding purchasing behaviors in a virtual economy: Consumer behavior involving virtual currency in Web 2.0 communities. Interacting with Computers, 433-446.
  • Shim, S., & Gehrt, K. C. (1996). Hispanic and Native American adolescents: An exploratory study of their approach to shopping. Journal of Retailing, 72(3), 307-324.
  • Sin, S. S., Nor, K. M., & Al-Agaga, A. M. (2012). Factors Affecting Malaysian Young Consumers' Online Purchase Intention in Social Media Websites. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 326-333.
  • Smith, D., Menon, S., & Sivakumar, K. (2005). Online peer and editorial recommendations, trust, and choice in virtual markets. Journal of interactive marketing, 19(3), 15-37.
  • Südaş, H. D., & Töge, B. Sosyal Ağlarda Tüketim Temelli Akran İletişiminin İncelenmesi: Adana İlinde Bir Uygulama. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 309-327
  • Taylor, J. W., Houlahan, J. J., & Gabriel, A. C. (1975). The purchase intention question in new product development: a field test. The Journal of Marketing, 90-92.
  • Trusov, M, M., Bucklin, R. E., & Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an Internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 90–102.
  • Ülger, G.(2012). Siber alemde çocukluğun yeniden üretimi. (Ed.) Sosyal Medya Akademi, İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
  • Valkenburg, P. M. & Buijen, M. (2005). Identifying determinants of young children’s brand awareness: Television, parents and peers. Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 456-468.
  • Wang, X. Yu, C. & Wei, Y. (2012). Social media peer communication and impacts on purchase intentions: A consumer socialization framework. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26, 198-208.
  • Ward, S. (1974). Consumer Socialization. Consumer Socialization, 1-16.
  • Xie, K., & Lee, Y. J. (2015). Social Media and Brand Purchase: Quantifying the Effects of Exposures to Earned and Owned Social Media Activities in a Two-Stage Decision Making Model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 204-238.
  • Zhang, J., & Daugherty, T. (2009). Third-person effect and social networking: implications for online marketing and word-of-mouth communication. American Journal of Business, 24(2), 53-64.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Hande Begum Bumin Doyduk This is me

Elif Okan This is me

Publication Date June 30, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 3 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Bumin Doyduk, H. B., & Okan, E. (2017). PEER COMMUNICATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA AND EFFECT ON PURCHASE INTENTION. PressAcademia Procedia, 3(1), 640-645. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.640
AMA Bumin Doyduk HB, Okan E. PEER COMMUNICATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA AND EFFECT ON PURCHASE INTENTION. PAP. June 2017;3(1):640-645. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.640
Chicago Bumin Doyduk, Hande Begum, and Elif Okan. “PEER COMMUNICATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA AND EFFECT ON PURCHASE INTENTION”. PressAcademia Procedia 3, no. 1 (June 2017): 640-45. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.640.
EndNote Bumin Doyduk HB, Okan E (June 1, 2017) PEER COMMUNICATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA AND EFFECT ON PURCHASE INTENTION. PressAcademia Procedia 3 1 640–645.
IEEE H. B. Bumin Doyduk and E. Okan, “PEER COMMUNICATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA AND EFFECT ON PURCHASE INTENTION”, PAP, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 640–645, 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.640.
ISNAD Bumin Doyduk, Hande Begum - Okan, Elif. “PEER COMMUNICATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA AND EFFECT ON PURCHASE INTENTION”. PressAcademia Procedia 3/1 (June 2017), 640-645. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.640.
JAMA Bumin Doyduk HB, Okan E. PEER COMMUNICATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA AND EFFECT ON PURCHASE INTENTION. PAP. 2017;3:640–645.
MLA Bumin Doyduk, Hande Begum and Elif Okan. “PEER COMMUNICATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA AND EFFECT ON PURCHASE INTENTION”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017, pp. 640-5, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.640.
Vancouver Bumin Doyduk HB, Okan E. PEER COMMUNICATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA AND EFFECT ON PURCHASE INTENTION. PAP. 2017;3(1):640-5.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.