BOOSTING ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN GEORGIA DEVELOPMENT OF FAB LABS

Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 29 - 33, 30.06.2017

Giorgi Benashvili

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.512

Abstract

Boosting
entrepreneurship has a crucial meaning for long-term economic development. It
is taken as axiomatic that innovative activity has been the single, most
important component of long-term economic growth. The Fab Lab concept is to
provide spaces open to the public where people can access tools, training and
designs in digital fabrications, and to base this around a global network of
physical workshops with access to on-line and other support services, as well
as being networked with one others. Fab Labs take advantage of increasing
accessibility to versatile and powerful digital design and fabrication tools.
During the last few years Georgian government increase funding and state
support to diffusion innovations into the economy. It’s evident if we count
launching the innovative laboratories in the different cities of Georgia. The
network consists more than 20 labs in the country. All of them are located at
the public spaces and are funding by state government. Fabrication Laboratories
offer to all entrepreneurs, students, and citizens full service of product
prototyping and business consulting. The article considered and discusses about
the role of this innovative laboratories into the economic growth, stimulation
of entrepreneurship and startup developments. 

 

Keywords

entrepreneurship

References

• Smith, A & Hielscher, S & Fressoli, M (2015) Transformative Social Innovation Narrative: FabLabs. TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169 | 31st of March 2015” Accessed at WWW: http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/content/original/Book%20covers/Local%20PDFs/145%20TSI%20Narrative_Fablabs_Upload.pdf
• Fonda, C & Canessa, E (2015) “Making Ideas at Scientific Fabrication Laboratories” The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics.
• Kuriakose, S (2013) Fostering Entrepreneurship in Georgia, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington, USA.
• OECD (2007) INNOVATION AND GROWTH RATIONALE FOR AN INNOVATION STRATEGY, OECD Publishing, Accessed at WWW: http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/39374789.pdf
• Gerguri, S and Ramadani, R (2010) “The Impact of Innovation into the Economic Growth” South East European University at Tetovo, Faculty of Business Administration, Accessed at WWW: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/22270/1/MPRA_paper_22270.pdf Drucker P. F. (1993), Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Harper & Row Publishers Inc., New York, USA.
• Fingar, P. (2006), Extreme Competition: Innovation and the Great 21st Century Business Reformation, Meghan-Kiffer Press, Florida, USA
• Horn, P., Maxwell, E. and Crawford, S. (2004), Promoting Innovation and Economic Growth: the special problem of digital intellectual property, A Report by the Digital Connections Council of the Committee for Economic Development.
• Zuleeg, F. Green, J. and Schubert, B. C. (2007), Cultivating a Market for Innovation in Europe, Policy Brief of the European Policy Centre.
• OECD (2012) Innovation for Development, OECD Publishing, Accessed at WWW: http://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/50586251.pdf
• Agenda.ge (2015) “New laboratory turns dreams into reality for Tbilisi entrepreneurs”, News agency, Accessed at WWW: http://agenda.ge/news/46271/eng
• Blikstein, P. (2013). “Digital Fabrication and ’Making’ in Education: The Democratization of Invention”. In J. Walter-Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors. Bielefeld: Transcript Publishers.
• Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO (2015): The Global Innovation Index 2015: Effective Innovation Policies for Development, Fontainebleau, Ithaca, and Geneva.
• Cameron, G (1996) INNOVATION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH, Centre for Economic Performance London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
• Benashvili, G. and Asanidze, N. (2016) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE SOUTHCAUCASUSEAST-WEST CROSSROAD, The 2016 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings