Öz
Amaç- Hükümetler, vatandaşlarının refahı için ulaşım,
sağlık, eğitim gibi sektörlerde çeşitli hizmet ve yatırım faaliyetlerini
çeşitli metodolojiler ile ifa ve icra eder. Kamu Özel İşbirliği modeli finansal
ve işletimsel avantajları nedeniyle Türkiye’de son zamanlarda çok tercih
edilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın ana amacı, Kamu Özel İşbirliği (KÖİ) projelerinin
temel ilkelerinin anlaşılması, uluslararası örnekler ve prensiplerin bir örnek
olay analizi olarak Avrasya Tüneli ile karşılaştırmasının
gerçekleştirilmesidir.
Yöntem- Kamu Özel İşbirliğinin temel ilkeleri ve uygulama
süreçleri açıklayıcı araştırma modeli kullanılarak verilmiştir. Önerilen
organizasyon yapıları, süreç döngüsü ve uygulama süreçleri, karşılaştırmalı
örnek olay analizi modeli kullanılarak teorik bilgi ile pratik uygulamanın kıyaslaması
yapılmıştır.
Bulgular- Karşılaştırma çalışması sonuçlarına göre tespit edilen
benzerlikler ve örnek olay analizi ile ilgili detaylı bilgi paylaşılmıştır.
Ayrıca örnek vaka analizinde proje ile ilgili tespit edilen ek faydalar da bu
çalışmada belirtilmiştir.
Sonuç- Başarılı bir Kamu Özel İşbirliği projesi ve temel
ilkeleri, örnek olay analizi ile belirlenmiştir. Projenin ek faydalarının
tespiti vasıtasıyla yeniden değerleme yaklaşımı geliştirilmesi ve diğer KÖİ
Projelerinin gelecek çalışmalarda kullanması değerlendirilecektir.
Anahtar Kelimeler
KÖİ Projelerinin temel ilkeleri örnek olay analizi Avrasya Tüneli ulaşım
Kaynakça
- Ababutain, A.Y., Bullen, G.R. (2003), “Multicriteria Decision-Making Model for Selection of Build–Operate–Transfer Toll Road Proposals in the Public Sector”, Transportation Research Record 1848 Paper No. 03-2264
- Bettignies, J.E., Ross, T.W., (2010), “Public-Private Partnerships: Economic and International Dimensions”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 67, No. 3 (May - Jun., 2007), pp. 545-558
- CHEN, Z., & DUHAMEL, M. (Eds.). (2010). Industrial Organization in Canada: Empirical Evidence and Policy Challenges. McGill-Queen's University Press
- Farquharson, E., Mästle, C.T., Yescombe, E. R., Encinas, J. (2011). How to Engage with the Private Sector in Public-Private Partnerships in Emerging Markets. Washington, DC: World Bank.
- Grimsey, D., Lewis, M.K. (2004), “The Governance of Contractual Relationships in Public–Private Partnerships”, The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, No. 15, Towards Better Governance and Accountability: Exploring the Relationships between the Public, Private and the Community (Autumn 2004), pp. 91-109
- Hodge, G.A., Greve, C., (2007), “Public-Private Partnerships: An International Performance Review”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 67, No. 3 (May - Jun., 2007), pp. 545-558
- Hodge, G.A., Greve, C., (2007), “On Public–Private Partnership Performance: A Contemporary Review”, Public Works Management & Policy 2017, Vol. 22(1) 55–78
- Mazouz, B., Facal, J., Viola, J.M., (2008), “Public-Private Partnership: Elements for a Project-Based Management Typology”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 2, 98–110
- PPP Knowledge Lab (2019). https://pppknowledgelab.org
- PPPLRC (2019). PUBLIC-PRIVATE-PARTNERSHIP LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER, https://ppp.worldbank.org
- PPIAF (2019). Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility, https://ppiaf.org/
- Republic of Turkey Ministry of Treasury and Finance, Privatization Administration, https://www.oib.gov.tr/
- Siemiatycki, M., (2006), “Implications of Private-Public Partnerships on the Development of Urban Public Transit Infrastructure The Case of Vancouver, Canada”, Journal of Planning Education and Research 26:137-151
- Yescombe, E.R. (2007). Public-Private Partnerships: Principles of Policy and Finance. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Öz
Purpose- Governments perform and observe various services and
investments via various methodologies in several sectors such as
transportation, health, education for the prosperity of the citizens.
Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) model is a commonly applied method by Turkish
Government recently due to financing and operational advantages. The main
purpose of the study is to understand the fundamentals of a PPP Project and
compare international examples and principles with a case analysis of the Eurasia
Tunnel.
Methodology- PPP fundamentals and the application process are defined
in the study with exploratory research methodology. According to the
recommended structures, process cycle and process applications, comparative
case study methodology is used to determine the similarities between
theoretical knowledge and practice.
Findings- As a result of the comparison study the similarities
and detailed information are provided about the case study. Also, the
additional benefits of the project mentioned in the case study is determined.
Conclusion- A
successful PPP Project example and its fundamentals are determined according to
the case study. With the help of additional benefits of the project, a
revaluation approach to be considered for PPP Projects for the future studies.
Anahtar Kelimeler
PPP Project fundamentals case study Eurasia Tunnel transportation
Kaynakça
- Ababutain, A.Y., Bullen, G.R. (2003), “Multicriteria Decision-Making Model for Selection of Build–Operate–Transfer Toll Road Proposals in the Public Sector”, Transportation Research Record 1848 Paper No. 03-2264
- Bettignies, J.E., Ross, T.W., (2010), “Public-Private Partnerships: Economic and International Dimensions”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 67, No. 3 (May - Jun., 2007), pp. 545-558
- CHEN, Z., & DUHAMEL, M. (Eds.). (2010). Industrial Organization in Canada: Empirical Evidence and Policy Challenges. McGill-Queen's University Press
- Farquharson, E., Mästle, C.T., Yescombe, E. R., Encinas, J. (2011). How to Engage with the Private Sector in Public-Private Partnerships in Emerging Markets. Washington, DC: World Bank.
- Grimsey, D., Lewis, M.K. (2004), “The Governance of Contractual Relationships in Public–Private Partnerships”, The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, No. 15, Towards Better Governance and Accountability: Exploring the Relationships between the Public, Private and the Community (Autumn 2004), pp. 91-109
- Hodge, G.A., Greve, C., (2007), “Public-Private Partnerships: An International Performance Review”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 67, No. 3 (May - Jun., 2007), pp. 545-558
- Hodge, G.A., Greve, C., (2007), “On Public–Private Partnership Performance: A Contemporary Review”, Public Works Management & Policy 2017, Vol. 22(1) 55–78
- Mazouz, B., Facal, J., Viola, J.M., (2008), “Public-Private Partnership: Elements for a Project-Based Management Typology”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 2, 98–110
- PPP Knowledge Lab (2019). https://pppknowledgelab.org
- PPPLRC (2019). PUBLIC-PRIVATE-PARTNERSHIP LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER, https://ppp.worldbank.org
- PPIAF (2019). Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility, https://ppiaf.org/
- Republic of Turkey Ministry of Treasury and Finance, Privatization Administration, https://www.oib.gov.tr/
- Siemiatycki, M., (2006), “Implications of Private-Public Partnerships on the Development of Urban Public Transit Infrastructure The Case of Vancouver, Canada”, Journal of Planning Education and Research 26:137-151
- Yescombe, E.R. (2007). Public-Private Partnerships: Principles of Policy and Finance. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Konular | Finans, İşletme |
| Bölüm | Makaleler |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Temmuz 2019 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2019 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1 |
Kaynak Göster
PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.
PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants.
PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.
PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing.
Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.