THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON GREEN LOGISTICS IN EMERGING OECD COUNTRIES: A PANEL ARDL APPROACH

Year 2025, Volume: 21 Issue: 1, 22 - 27, 30.07.2025

Meltem Yangın Ebru Demirci

Abstract

Purpose- This study examines the dynamic relationship between financial development and green logistics in emerging OECD countries by applying a panel ARDL approach. Inspired by Özaytürk and Özekenci (2024), the main goal is to understand how financial development contributes to green logistics transformation in economies with evolving financial infrastructures.
Methodology- The analysis covers nine emerging OECD countries (Turkey, Poland, Mexico, Hungary, Slovakia, Colombia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia) from 2002 to 2021. The dependent variable is the ratio of transport-related CO₂ emissions to GDP, used as a proxy for green logistics performance (Fan et al., 2022). Financial development (FD), foreign direct investment (FDI), and trade openness (TO) serve as explanatory variables. Panel ARDL modeling is employed to capture both long-run and short-run effects, with cross-sectional dependence tested using Pesaran CD (2004), stationarity examined via Levin-Lin-Chu (2002), and common factor structure assessed using PANIC (Bai & Ng, 2004).
Findings- Empirical findings suggest that financial development has a statistically significant and negative effect on CO₂ emissions in the long term, confirming its role in supporting green logistics (Jinru et al., 2022; Xu & Li, 2024). In contrast, FDI and TO do not exhibit significant long-run effects. The short-term impacts of all variables were found to be statistically insignificant, highlighting the crucial importance of institutional quality and environmental governance (Agyabeng-Mensah & Tang, 2021; Barut et al., 2023).
Conclusion- The study underscores the pivotal role of financial development in facilitating green logistics by easing access to environmentally friendly investments. However, financial mechanisms alone are not sufficient; complementary policy tools such as strong environmental regulations, institutional capacity, and governance reforms are necessary to ensure sustainable green logistics transitions in emerging economies (Xu & Li, 2024)..

Keywords

Green logistics , financial development , foreign direct investment , trade openness , panel ARDL

References

• Abukhader, S. M., & Jönson, G. (2004). Logistics and the environment: Is it an established subject? International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 7(2), 137–149.
• Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., & Tang, L. (2021). Green human capital, dynamic capabilities, and sustainable supply chain performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 329, 129676.
• Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2015). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329–341.
• Alshubiri, F. (2017). Green logistics and financial performance: Evidence from Oman. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(34), 26550–26563.
• Asif, M., Rehman, A., Usman, M., Ozturk, I., & Hafeez, M. (2024). Financial development, renewable energy, and green growth in BRICS countries. Sustainability, 16(2), 978.
• Bai, J., & Ng, S. (2004). A PANIC attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica, 72(4), 1127–1177.
• Barut, M., Citil, M., Ahmed, M., Sinha, A., & Abbas, G. (2023). Financial development, foreign direct investment, and green logistics: Comparative analysis between G7 and E7 countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 347, 119123.
• Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica, 47(5), 1287–1294.
• Climate Bonds Initiative. (2025). Annual Report 2025. Retrieved from https://www.climatebonds.net/
• Cole, M. A., & Elliott, R. J. R. (2003). Determining the trade–environment composition effect: The role of capital, labor, and environmental regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(3), 363–383.
• Dean, J. M., Lovely, M. E., & Wang, H. (2009). Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, 90(1), 1–13.
• Eskeland, G. S., & Harrison, A. E. (2003). Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 70(1), 1–23.
• Famanta, M., Randhawa, K., & Yajing, Y. (2024). Foreign direct investment and environmental performance: Evidence from emerging economies. Sustainability, 16(2), 978.
• Fan, J., Wu, J., Qalati, S. A., He, Q., & Hussain, S. (2022). The effect of green logistics on exports: Evidence from China’s RCEP trade partners. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(4), 5641–5654.
• Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499–516.
• Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic Econometrics (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Jinru, Y., Changbiao, Z., Ahmad, M., Irfan, M., & Nazir, R. (2022). Financial development and environmental performance: Empirical evidence from developing countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(4), 5641–5654.
• Kim, Y., Na, S., & Ha, M. (2024). The role of green logistics in enhancing financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing firms. Heliyon, 10(3), e13251.
• Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24.
• Li, Y., Ullah, S., Ozturk, I., & Usman, M. (2021). Financial development, FDI, and green logistics performance in Belt and Road Initiative economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(1), 5641–5654.
• Li, Y., & Ramanathan, R. (2020). Exploring the relationships between different types of environmental regulations and environmental performance: The role of foreign direct investment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119125.
• Liu, Z., Li, Q., Chen, X., Huang, J., & Ju, Y. (2022). Green supply chain practices and trade competitiveness: Evidence from emerging economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 370, 133466.
• Loumioti, M., & Serafeim, G. (2022). Accountability and incentives in sustainability-linked debt. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 21-071.
• Nguyen, T. (2021). Green logistics adoption and its impact on operational performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123971.
• OECD. (2020). Green growth and sustainable development: OECD green growth studies. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2024). Financing green transitions: Sustainability-linked instruments and policy frameworks. OECD Publishing.
• Özaytürk, M. S., & Özekenci, Y. (2024). What is the role of financial development on green logistics? Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 22(1), 45–68.
• Pao, H. T., & Tsai, C. M. (2010). CO₂ emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7850–7860.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper Series, No. 1229.
• Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621–634.
• Piecyk, M. I., & McKinnon, A. C. (2010). Forecasting the carbon footprint of road freight transport in 2020. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 31–42.
• Pop, A., & Atanasov, A. (2021). Sustainability-linked loans: A new form of green financing. Sustainability, 13(5), 2564.
• Sandberg, E. (2021). Dynamic capabilities for green logistics: Developing resilience through sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring. Sustainability, 13(1), 394.
• Sarkis, J. (2003). A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(4), 397–409.
• Sbihi, A., & Eglese, R. W. (2007). Combinatorial optimization and green logistics. 4OR, 5(2), 99–116.
• Sezer, A. (2023). Financial development and green logistics in BRICS and Gulf countries: A panel data analysis. Energy Economics, 115, 106392.
• Wang, K., Dong, K., Peng, Z., Khan, M. A., & Tarasov, A. (2018). The impact of environmental regulation on green productivity growth: Empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing industries. Energy Economics, 68, 254–263.
• Wang, Y., Liu, X., Zhou, L., Zang, Y., & Shen, Y. (2023). Trade openness and green logistics performance: Evidence from emerging economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 386, 135762.
• Xu, M., & Li, L. (2024). Financial transparency and green logistics: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 348, 119323.
• Yang, C., Rehman, A., Ma, H., & Alvarado, R. (2023). Trade openness, renewable energy, and green logistics performance in BRICS and Gulf countries. Sustainability, 15(3), 1245.
• Zaman, K., & Shamsuddin, S. (2017). Green logistics and environment: A global perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 314–327.
• Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265–289.