A sample STEM activity based on the engineering design process: A study on prospective preschool teachers’ views
Abstract
This research aimed to introduce a STEM activity specifically prepared in accordance with the engineering design process and to examine a group of prospective preschool teachers’ views about the activity. A total of 16 prospective teachers studying in the final year of a public university in the West Black Sea Region, Turkey, during the fall semester of the 2021/22 academic year were the participants of the study. The STEM activity was based on the problem of making a fish model that can sink, swim and float in water. At the end of the activity, an open-ended activity opinion form was used to gather the prospective teachers’ views about the activity. The data were analyzed using the descriptive analysis method by taking into consideration the themes related to STEM, as specified in the theoretical framework. The results of the study show that the prospective teachers took the opportunity to experience how a STEM activity is held, that they found the activity fun and interesting, as well as conducive to learning science concepts and higher-order thinking skills. As for the negative aspects of the activity, the respondents stated that the activity was time-consuming, and that it was difficult to decide on and build the design. We believe that this study will provide theoretical and practical contributions to both researchers and preschool teachers.
Keywords
engineering design process, prospective preschool teachers, STEM education
References
- Aldemir, J., & Kermani, H. (2017). Integrated STEM curriculum: Improving educational outcomes for head start children. Early Child Development and Care, 187(11), 1694–1706.
- Aladé, F., Lauricella, A. R., Beaudoin-Ryan, L., & Wartella, E. (2016). Measuring with Murray: Touchscreen technology and pre-schoolers’ STEM learning. Computers in Human Behaviour, 62, 433–441.
- Atiles, J. T., Jones, J. L., & Anderson, J. A. (2013). More than a Read-Aloud: Preparing and Inspiring Early Childhood Teachers to Develop our Future Scientists. Teacher Education and Practice, 26(2), 285-299.
- Baigiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2015). Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: The teacher’s experience. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(1), 112–128.
- Basham, J. D., & Marino, M. T. (2013). Understanding STEM education and supporting students through universal design for learning. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45(4), 8-15.
- Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P‐12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387.
- Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2019). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi Press.
- Cantrell, Pekcan, Itani, & Velasquez-Bryant, 2006 Cantrell, P., Pekcan, G., Itani, A., & Velasquez-Bryant, N. (2006). The effects of engineering modules on student learning in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 301-309
- Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2016). Math, Science, and Technology in the Early Grades. The Future of Children, 26(2), 75–94. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43940582
- Corbett, K. S., & Coriell, J. M. (2014). STEM explore, discover, apply – A middle school elective (curriculum exchange). ASEE Annual Conference. Indianapolis, Indiana. January 2014. [Online: https://peer.asee.org/23034]
