Comparison of the Theoretical and Practical Knowledge of the Pre-Service Science Teachers in Turkey: The Context of Simple Electrical Circuits
Abstract
Laboratory applications are one of the most essential strategies in science teaching. Therefore, science teachers are expected to advance their laboratory skills. In Türkiye, there are generally applications for construct theoretical knowledge. Literature indicates the need for individuals who can use knowledge. For this reason, there is a need for laboratory skills through which knowledge is used in science teaching. Hence to meet this need, it is expected that theoretical knowledge will be used unitedly with practical knowledge. This research aims to compare pre-service science teachers’ knowledge of simple electrical circuits which is both theorical and practical. The research group consisted of 60 pre-service science teachers studying at a university in Trabzon, Turkey. The study was carried out using the case study method under the category of descriptive research approaches. Data were collected with conducting drawings, observation studies of experimental setups, and clinical interviews. Data were analyzed through content analysis. The data obtained determined that pre-service science teachers had 'theoretical' knowledge within the scope of simple electrical circuits, but they could not put this knowledge into practice 'practically' and could not establish the circuits. In addition, it is one of the findings of the research that pre- service science teachers are theoretically limited in what they learn, and they do not have the opportunity to use the novel forms of knowledge in active learning environments, which indicates they do not have procedural knowledge.
Keywords
Pre-service science teachers, theoretical and practical knowledge, ; electrical circuits, electrical circuits
References
- Akgun, Ö. (2010). The insights and science literacy of teacher candidates for science and technology lab. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Firat University Institute of Social Sciences, Elazig.
- Alkan, F. & Erdem, E. (2013). Self-learning success in the lab, preparation, laboratory skills attitude and impact on concern. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 44, 15-26.
- Aydogan, I. (2009). Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage. Online Submission, 4(1). 19-35.
- Baran, M., Yasar, S. & Maskan, A. (2015). Evaluation of prospective physics teachers’ views towards the teaching practice course. Dicle University Ziya Gokalp Education Faculty Journal, 26, 230-248.
- Berkes, F. (2009). Community conserved areas: policy issues in historic and contemporary context. Conservation letters, 2(1), 20-25.
- Blossfeld, H. P., & Von Maurice, J. (2011). 2 Education as a lifelong process. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 14(2), 19-34.
- Boddey, K. (2012). Chemistry experiences of first-year nursing students: the interplay of self efficacy, anxiety, prior chemistry experience and academic performance – a mixed method approach. Unpublished Master Thesis. Avondale College of Higher Education, Auckland, New Zealand.
- Cardak, O., Onder, K. & Dikmenli, M. (2007). Effect of the usage of laboratory method on primary school education for the achievement of the students’ learning. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 1-11.
- Cavallo, A. M. L. (1996). Meaningful learning, reasoning ability and students’ understanding and problem solving of genetic topics. Journal of Research Science Teaching, 33(6), 625-656.
- Celik, H., Koken, O. & Kanat, B. (2021). Laboratory usage competencies and problems encountered in accordance with the questioning approach of science teachers. Gazi Journal of Education Sciences, 7(2), 196-223.
