Research Article

The Impact of Reading Strategy Training and Extensive Reading on L2 Reading Process

Volume: 12 Number: 5 September 1, 2025

The Impact of Reading Strategy Training and Extensive Reading on L2 Reading Process

Abstract

Readers can improve their comprehension, self-efficacy beliefs, and perceptions by choosing and applying specific strategies. Through explicit training in reading strategies, this study aims to explore the impact of an extensive reading (ER)- integrated reading course on reading comprehension, reading self-efficacy (RSE), perceived utility of reading strategies (PURS), and perceived utility of extensive reading (PUER). Seventy-six university students participated in a semester-long course integrating a reading strategy model with ER activities. The students’ reading comprehension, RSE, PURS, and PUER scores, and perceptions of reading strategy use were measured before and after the intervention. Significant improvements were observed across all measures between the pre- and post-test applications. Qualitative analyses of open-ended questions yielded important results regarding the students’ awareness of the reading strategies taught and ER exercises implemented. Specifically, students’ elaborations on what strategies they utilized and how, when, and why they employed these strategies were found to be improved following the training sessions. The findings suggest that integrating explicit strategy instruction with ER practices can enhance both comprehension and metacognitive awareness, while also encouraging autonomous reading behaviors. Pedagogical implications include designing university-level reading courses that combine systematic strategy training with ER to foster active engagement, strengthen vocabulary development, and support lifelong reading practices.

Keywords

L2 reading, strategy training, perceived utility, extensive reading, reading self-efficacy

Ethical Statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Yildiz Technical University (approval number: 2021l08).

References

  1. Afflerbach, P., & Cho, B. (2009). Identifying and describing constructively responsive comprehension strategies in new and traditional forms of reading. In S.E., Israel & G.G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (69-90). Routledge.
  2. Afflerbach, P., Hurt, M., & Cho, B.-Y. (2020). Reading comprehension strategy instruction. In D.L. Dinsmore, L.K. Fryer, & M.M. Parkinson (Eds.), Handbook of strategies and strategic processing (pp. 99–118). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429423635-7
  3. Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364-373. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.5.1
  4. Anggia, H., & Habók, A. (2025). The efficacy of online extensive reading among university students and the relationship between affective variables and English reading comprehension. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 8373. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92326-9
  5. Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2012). Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students’ reading performance and strategy transfer. Instructional Science, 40, 1063-1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9202-5
  6. Ajideh, P., Zohrabi, M., & Pouralvar, K. (2018). The effect of explicit instruction of metacognitive reading strategies on ESP reading comprehension in academic settings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(4), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.4p.77
  7. Akkakoson, S. (2013). The effects of strategy instruction on Thai university students’ reading comprehension and strategy use. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(3), 562 570. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.3.562-570
  8. Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 460-472. https://doi.org/10.2307/329495
  9. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
  10. Antoniou, F., & Souvignier, E. (2007). Strategy instruction in reading comprehension: an intervention study for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 5(1), 41-57.
APA
Özata, H., & Ünal, B. (2025). The Impact of Reading Strategy Training and Extensive Reading on L2 Reading Process. Participatory Educational Research, 12(5), 154-185. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.68.12.5
AMA
1.Özata H, Ünal B. The Impact of Reading Strategy Training and Extensive Reading on L2 Reading Process. PER. 2025;12(5):154-185. doi:10.17275/per.25.68.12.5
Chicago
Özata, Hatice, and Burcu Ünal. 2025. “The Impact of Reading Strategy Training and Extensive Reading on L2 Reading Process”. Participatory Educational Research 12 (5): 154-85. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.68.12.5.
EndNote
Özata H, Ünal B (September 1, 2025) The Impact of Reading Strategy Training and Extensive Reading on L2 Reading Process. Participatory Educational Research 12 5 154–185.
IEEE
[1]H. Özata and B. Ünal, “The Impact of Reading Strategy Training and Extensive Reading on L2 Reading Process”, PER, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 154–185, Sept. 2025, doi: 10.17275/per.25.68.12.5.
ISNAD
Özata, Hatice - Ünal, Burcu. “The Impact of Reading Strategy Training and Extensive Reading on L2 Reading Process”. Participatory Educational Research 12/5 (September 1, 2025): 154-185. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.68.12.5.
JAMA
1.Özata H, Ünal B. The Impact of Reading Strategy Training and Extensive Reading on L2 Reading Process. PER. 2025;12:154–185.
MLA
Özata, Hatice, and Burcu Ünal. “The Impact of Reading Strategy Training and Extensive Reading on L2 Reading Process”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 12, no. 5, Sept. 2025, pp. 154-85, doi:10.17275/per.25.68.12.5.
Vancouver
1.Hatice Özata, Burcu Ünal. The Impact of Reading Strategy Training and Extensive Reading on L2 Reading Process. PER. 2025 Sep. 1;12(5):154-85. doi:10.17275/per.25.68.12.5