The Relationship Between Gifted Students’ Readiness to Learn and their Attitudes Towards Research/Inquiry in Connectivist Learning Environments

Tuğba Bağdat Kılıç; Demet Hatice Somuncuoğlu Özerbaş

doi:10.17275/per.25.69.12.5

The Relationship Between Gifted Students’ Readiness to Learn and their Attitudes Towards Research/Inquiry in Connectivist Learning Environments

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between the readiness of gifted students to learn in connective learning environments and their attitudes towards research/inquiry. The research was designed with the relational survey model, one of the quantitative research methods. The study group of the research consists of 227 gifted students who attend Çorum Science and Art Center, Türkiye. “Readiness for Learning in Connective Environments Scale” and “Attitude Scale Towards Research/Inquiry for Secondary School Students” were used as data collection tools. Descriptive statistics, Pearson Correlation Coefficient and multiple linear regression analysis were performed using SPSS program in the analysis of the data. The findings show that there is a low-level, positive and significant relationship between the readiness of gifted students to learn in connective environments and their attitudes towards research/inquiry. It was concluded that their attitudes towards research/inquiry have a low-level, positive and significant relationship with contextualization and navigation skills, which are the sub-dimensions of readiness for learning in connective environments. In addition, a low-level, positive and significant relationship was found between curiosity and contextualization and navigation skills, between avoidance and resource management, and between valuing and navigation skills. In the study, it was found that the levels of readiness to learn in a connective environment of gifted students and all sub-dimensions of this structure significantly predicted "curiosity", which is a sub-dimension of attitudes towards research/inquiry.

Keywords

connectionist learning environment, inquiry, attitude, gifted students

References

Akbaş, M., & Çetin, P. S. (2018). Investigating the argumentative quality and informal thinking skills of gifted students on various socioscientific issues. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 339–360.
Atay, B. (2019). A study on developing a connectivist learning readiness scale (Unpublished master’s thesis). Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Avcı Doğan, G., & Tamul, Ö. F. (2024). Identification and education of gifted students in Turkey. Ordu University Faculty of Education Journal, 1(1), 12–34.
Babadoğan, C., & Gürkan, T. (2002). The effect of inquiry teaching strategy on academic achievement. Educational Sciences and Practice, 1(2), 149–180.
Bagdat, T., & Ozerbas, D. H. (2022). A learning design model in connectivism theory: Learning development cycle. In H. F. Odabasi, A. Isman, & B. Akkoyunlu (Eds.), Educational technologies readings 2022 (pp. 47–67). Pegem Academy Publishing.
Baldan, B., Hamzaj, Y. A., & Çardak, Ç. S. (2018). A connectivist learning activity supporting creative thinking: Analogy wall. Elementary Education Online, 17(4), 2049–2074.
Baque, S. R., Mas’ud, F., & Ningsih, R. S. (2020). Connectivism learning theory: A philosophical view in digital learning. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 7(5), 82–87.
Boyraz, S. (2021). Online foreign language listening skills teaching with connectivism-based information and communication technologies support in fifth grades (Doctoral dissertation). Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey.
Bozkurt, A. (2014). Network society and learning: Connectivism. Academic Informatics, 601–606.
Bozkurt, Ö. A. (2015). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) and lifelong learning opportunity in the digital information age. Open Education Applications and Research Journal, 1(1), 56–81.

Bozkurt, A. (2016). Determination of interaction patterns and teacher-learner roles in connectivist massive open online courses (Doctoral dissertation). Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Demirel, F., Karadeniz, Ş., & Çakmak, E. K. (2021). Scientific research methods. Ankara.
Çalışkan, H. & Turan, R. (2008). The Effect of Research-Based Learning Approach on Academic Success and Permanence Level in Social Studies Course. Turkish Educational Sciences Journal, 6(4), 603-627.
Chatti, M. A., Dyckhoff, A. L., Schroeder, U., & Thüs, H. (2012). A reference model for learning analytics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5/6), 318–331.
Ceylan, E., & Elmalı, H. (2021). Readiness for connective learning and social media usage skills. Theory and Practice in Education, 17(1), 45-62.
Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M., & Frosch-Wilke, D. (2007). The future of e-learning: A shift to knowledge networking and social software. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(4/5), 404–420. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2007.016316
Çoban, B. T., & Ay, Ş. Ç. (2023). Learning from a Connectivist Perspective: Learning Process, Principles, and Learner Roles. Düzce University Journal of Social Sciences, 13(2), 253-271.
Cormier, D., & Siemens, G. (2010). Through the open door: Open courses as research, learning, and engagement. Educause Review, 45(4), 30–39.
Davis, S. A. (2005). Inquiry-based learning templates for creating online educational paths (Master’s thesis). A&M University, Texas.
Downes, S. (2007). What connectivism is [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.html
Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/files/books/Connective_Knowledge%2019May2012.pdf
Dunaway, K. M. (2011). Connectivism: Learning theory and pedagogical practice for networked information landscapes. Reference Services Review, 39(4), 675–685.
Eryılmaz, M., & Dikici, A. (2021). The relationship between contextual learning skills and critical thinking and inquiry competencies. Journal of Education and Teaching Research, 10(3), 23-34.
Eren, Z. (2018). Connectivism Theory and Social Network Analysis of Prospective Teachers' Learning Networks. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(19).
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.
Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064–1069. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661
Has Erdoğan, B. Development of high-level mathematics skills in connectivist learning environments (Doctoral Thesis). Ankara University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
Hocaoğlu, N., & Akkuş-Baysal, E. (2019). Quantitative research models and designs. In G. Ocak (Ed.), Scientific research methods in education (pp. 66–125). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
Jirout, J. J., & Klahr, D. (2012). Children's scientific curiosity: In search of an operational definition of an elusive concept. Developmental Review, 32(2), 125–160.
Justice, C., Rice, J., Roy, D., Hudspith, B., & Jenkins, H. (2009). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: Administrators’ perspectives on integrating inquiry pedagogy into the curriculum. Higher Education, 54(6), 853–864.
Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). Multivariate statistical techniques with SPSS applications. Asil Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
Karaduman, G. (2018). Applicability of connectivism-based microlearning in foreign language learning: Voscreen example (Master's thesis, Anadolu University (Turkey)).
Karamustafaoğlu, S., & Havuz, A. C. (2016). Investigation of prospective science teachers' perceptions of inquiry-based learning. Amasya University Faculty of Education Journal, 5(1), 233-247.
Kaya, N. G., Mertol, H., Turhan, G., Araz, D., & Uçar, H. (2022). An analysis of postgraduate theses on differentiation and enrichment practices in the education of gifted students. Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, (41), 102–114.
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach. New York: Springer.
Koc, M., & Erdem, M. (2018). The effect of social media tools on research processes: A qualitative study. Education and Science, 43(193), 321-339. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7479
Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.523
Korkmaz, Ö., Ozan, C. E., & Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2016). The scale of attitudes of middle school students towards research-inquiry. Amasya University Education Journal, 5(2), 483-509.
Köksal, M. S. (2021). Science and Art Centers. In M. S. Köksal & M. R. Barın (Eds.), Giftedness and Science and Art Centers (BİLSEM) (pp. 165–187). Ministry of National Education Publications.
Lim, B. R. (2001). Guidelines for designing inquiry-based learning on the web: Online Professional development of educators. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Indiana University, USA.
Lim, C. P. (2001). Computer-based constructivist learning environments: a review of the literature. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 222–243. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1784
MoNE, (2018). Special Education Services Regulation. Retrieved from https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/07/20180707-8.htm on 05.01.2024.
MoNE, (2024). Special Education Services Regulation. Retrieved from
https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/upload/kilavuz/modul-6-yayin.pdf
Ozan, C. E., Korkmaz, Ö., & Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2016). Attitude scale of middle school students towards research-inquiry. Amasya University Education Journal, 5(2), 483–509.
Ozan, Ö. (2013). Directive support in connectivist mobile learning environments (Doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University, Turkey).
Özmen, H., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2019). Research methods in education (2nd ed.). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
Özerbaş, D. H., & Bağdat Kılıç, T. (2022). A learning design model in connectivist theory: Learning development cycle. In Educational Technology Readings 2022 (pp. 47–67). Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
Pandya, R., Buettner, K., & Linder, J. (2024). Building a learning ecosystem through connectivism: Cultivating knowledge in digital spaces. Journal of Education for Business. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629241256317
Perry, V. R., & Richardson, C. P. (2001). New Mexico Tech science graduate curriculum: An exemplary model of inquiry-based learning. In 31st Annual Conference on Frontiers in Education. Its Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. T3E-1). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2001.963734
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1–2), 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 1–9.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: Learning as network-creation. ASTD Learning News, 10(1). Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/networks.htm
Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Vancouver: Lulu Press.
Türegün Çoban, B., & Çeviker Ay, Ş. (2023). Learning from the perspective of connectivism: Learning process, principles, and learner roles. Düzce University Journal of Social Sciences, 13(2), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.55179/dusbed.1332953
Wang, F., Kinzie, M. B., McGuire, P., & Pan, E. (2010). Applying technology to inquiry-based learning in early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37, 381–389.
Yaşar, Ş., & Duban, N. (2009). Student opinions on inquiry-based learning approach. Primary Education Online, 8(2), 485–491.
Yıldırım, M., & Türker Altan, S. (2017). The effect of research and inquiry-based learning approach on primary school students’ scientific process skills. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 14(38), 71–89.
Yıldız, S., & Şahin, A. (2020). The relationship between connectivist learning readiness and ways of accessing information. Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Faculty of Education Journal (KEFAD), 21(2), 765-784.
Yurdugül, H., & Alsancak Sirakaya, D. (2013). Online learning readiness scale: Validity and reliability study. Education and Science, 38(169), 391–406.
Yurdugül, H., & Demir, Ö. (2017). Examining the readiness of teacher candidates for e-learning in teacher training undergraduate programs: Hacettepe University example. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 32(4), 896–915.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Specialist Studies in Education (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Tuğba Bağdat Kılıç ^*
0000-0001-8781-0222
Türkiye

Demet Hatice Somuncuoğlu Özerbaş
0000-0002-2050-1182
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

September 6, 2025

Publication Date

September 1, 2025

Submission Date

April 14, 2025

Acceptance Date

July 7, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 12 Number: 5

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.69.12.5

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA66WC56FM

APA

Bağdat Kılıç, T., & Somuncuoğlu Özerbaş, D. H. (2025). The Relationship Between Gifted Students’ Readiness to Learn and their Attitudes Towards Research/Inquiry in Connectivist Learning Environments. Participatory Educational Research, 12(5), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.69.12.5

AMA

1.Bağdat Kılıç T, Somuncuoğlu Özerbaş DH. The Relationship Between Gifted Students’ Readiness to Learn and their Attitudes Towards Research/Inquiry in Connectivist Learning Environments. PER. 2025;12(5):186-204. doi:10.17275/per.25.69.12.5

Chicago

Bağdat Kılıç, Tuğba, and Demet Hatice Somuncuoğlu Özerbaş. 2025. “The Relationship Between Gifted Students’ Readiness to Learn and Their Attitudes Towards Research Inquiry in Connectivist Learning Environments”. Participatory Educational Research 12 (5): 186-204. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.69.12.5.

EndNote

Bağdat Kılıç T, Somuncuoğlu Özerbaş DH (September 1, 2025) The Relationship Between Gifted Students’ Readiness to Learn and their Attitudes Towards Research/Inquiry in Connectivist Learning Environments. Participatory Educational Research 12 5 186–204.

IEEE

[1]T. Bağdat Kılıç and D. H. Somuncuoğlu Özerbaş, “The Relationship Between Gifted Students’ Readiness to Learn and their Attitudes Towards Research/Inquiry in Connectivist Learning Environments”, PER, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 186–204, Sept. 2025, doi: 10.17275/per.25.69.12.5.

ISNAD

Bağdat Kılıç, Tuğba - Somuncuoğlu Özerbaş, Demet Hatice. “The Relationship Between Gifted Students’ Readiness to Learn and Their Attitudes Towards Research Inquiry in Connectivist Learning Environments”. Participatory Educational Research 12/5 (September 1, 2025): 186-204. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.69.12.5.

JAMA

1.Bağdat Kılıç T, Somuncuoğlu Özerbaş DH. The Relationship Between Gifted Students’ Readiness to Learn and their Attitudes Towards Research/Inquiry in Connectivist Learning Environments. PER. 2025;12:186–204.

MLA

Bağdat Kılıç, Tuğba, and Demet Hatice Somuncuoğlu Özerbaş. “The Relationship Between Gifted Students’ Readiness to Learn and Their Attitudes Towards Research Inquiry in Connectivist Learning Environments”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 12, no. 5, Sept. 2025, pp. 186-04, doi:10.17275/per.25.69.12.5.

Vancouver

1.Tuğba Bağdat Kılıç, Demet Hatice Somuncuoğlu Özerbaş. The Relationship Between Gifted Students’ Readiness to Learn and their Attitudes Towards Research/Inquiry in Connectivist Learning Environments. PER. 2025 Sep. 1;12(5):186-204. doi:10.17275/per.25.69.12.5