How Social Studies Teachers Reflect Their Immediate Environment: Kırıkkale Case

Gün Erol Şahin; Çağrı Öztürk Demirbaş

doi:10.17275/per.21.17.8.1

EN

How Social Studies Teachers Reflect Their Immediate Environment: Kırıkkale Case

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate how social studies teachers give information about the immediate environment in lessons and determine course objectives through non-formal school activities. The study sample consisted of 38 social studies teachers working in Kırıkkale province in the 2018-2019 academic year. The data were analyzed with content analysis methods. The data were collected with a semi-structured interview form, were processed in SPSS 17 and Microsoft Excel software and interpreted in relation to the relevant the literature. In the interview form, the teachers were grouped by certain variables: gender, professional experience, and settlement type of school. The study concluded that social studies teachers did not have adequate knowledge about the immediate environment and thus they could not transfer it to students. Although participant social studies teachers claimed to give information and examples during the course, their students expressed that their teachers did not give any examples. The study results also indicated that teachers did not sufficiently organize non-formal school activities to teach the immediate environment. Thusly, it is suggested that social studies teachers should be assisted in learning the immediate environment and should participate in training on non-formal teaching methods.

Keywords

Geography, geography education, social studies, social studies teacher, immediate environment, local geography

References

Agboola, B., & Offong, D. E. (2018) Occupational ıncentives and teacher retention in private secondary schools in akwa ıbomstate, nigeria. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 7(3), 263-277.
Aksoy, B., & Ablak, S. (2019). An evaluation of map literacy of social studies preservice teachers. Participatory Educational Research, 6(2), 158-168.
Alkan, V. (2016). Teaching Methods and Techniques in Social Studies Education. S. Şimşek (Eds.) Social Studies Teaching for Social Studies and Classroom Teachers. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
Ayas, C., & Taştan, B. (2015). Geographical Areas in out-of-school Social Studies Education. A. Şimşek and S. Çakmakçı. (Eds.) Out-of-school Social Studies Education. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
Çengelci, T. (2013). Social Studies teachers’ opinion about out-of-classroom learning. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice. 13(3), 1823-1841.
Çifçi, T., & Dikmenli, Y. (2016). Geography teachers’ views on out-of-school geography education, Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Education Faculty Journal (KEFAD), 17(1) 363-382.
Doğanay, H., & Doğanay, S. (2015). An Introduction to Geography. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
Dogutas, A. (2019). Place of some cultural objects in 7th grade social sciences textbooks. Participatory Educational Research, 6(1), 27-35.
Dolan, A. M. (2016). Place-based curriculum making: devising a synthesis between primary geography and out door learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 16(1), 49-62.
EBA (2013). Geographical features of our immediate environment. Retrieved from https://www.eba.gov.tr/video/izle/5347582f5360593a84c6b9df5f58dfea992902d09c001

Emekauwa, E. (2004). The star with my name: the alaska rural systemic ınitiative and the ımpact of place-based education on native student achievement. The Case for Place-Based. Rural Trust White Paper on Place-Based Education. Washinton: Rural School and Community Trust.
Gençtürk, E. & Sarpkaya, G. (2015). Qualifications of Social Studies Teachers, M. Safran (Eds.) Social Studies Education. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
İnce, Z. (2015). Investigation of Contribution of Secondary School Geography Lesson 10th Class Curriculum to Recognize the Environment in Which We Live. Marmara Geography Journal. 31 (1), 330-344.
James, J. K., & Williams, T. (2017). School-based experiential out door education. Journal of Experiential Education, 40(1), 58–71.
Kaya E., Akıllı, M. & Sezek, F. (2009). An Investigation of High School Students’ Environmental Attitudes In Terms of Gender. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Education Faculty Journal, (18), 43-54.
Kimaryo, L. (2011). Integrating environment aleducation in primary school education in Tanzania: teachers’ perceptions and teaching practices. (Unpublished master dissertation). Åbo Akademi University, Åbo. Retrieved from https://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/67481/kimaryo_lydia.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Köşker, N., & Karabağ, S. (2012). Teachers’ views on place based education approach in the education of geography. The Journal of Turkish Social Research, 2(163).
Lakin, L. (2006). Science beyond the classroom. Journal of Biological Education, 40 (2), 89-90.
The Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2018). Social Studies Curriculum: Primary and Secondary Schools 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th Grades. Ankara.
The Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2019). Social Studies Course book 6th Grade [Secondary and Imam Hatip Secondary School], Ankara: Public Books.
Myers, C. B., Adler, S., Brandhorst, A., Dougan, A. M., Dumas, W., Huffman, L. & Helmkamp, C. J. (2002). National standards for social studies teachers. Silver Spring, Md: National Council For The Social Studies.
Nagra, V. (2010). Environmental education awareness among school teachers. The Environmentalist, 30(2), 153-162.
Öner, G. (2016). Teaching Local Geography in Social Studies: Evaluation of Teachers’ Opinions. (Unpublished master dissertation). Abant İzzet Baysal University Institute of Educational Sciences Primary Education Department, Bolu.
Öztürk, Ç. (2004). Secondary School Geography Teachers’ Ability of Using Teaching Methods and Techniques. Gazi Üniversitesi Kırşehir Education Faculty. 5 (2), 75-83.
Öztürk Demirbaş, Ç. & Şahin, G. E. (2019, April). Geographical Information in Social Studies Textbooks from Local to Global.1st International Cappadocia Congress of Philosophy and Social Sciences (CAPASS2019). Nevşehir Hacı Bektaşi Veli University, Nevşehir. Retrieved from http://www.capasscongress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/CAPASS2019-Proceedings-ISBN-2.pdf
Peterson, S. S., McIntyre, L., & Heppner, D. (2018). Northern rural and ındigenous teachers’ experiences and perceptions of rural teaching and teachere ducation. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 7(3), 189-205.
Sağdıç, M., & Demirkaya, H. (2015). Learning Settings Based on Geographical Places in Social Studies Education. R, Sever and E, Koçoğlu (Eds.) Spatial Learning Environments in Social Studies. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
Scott D., & Louie D. (2020) Reconsidering rural education in the light of canada’s ındigenous reality. In: Corbett M., Gereluk D. (Eds.) Rural Teacher Education. Springer, Singapore.
Seefelt, C. Castle, S., & Falconer, R. C. (2015). People, Places, Environments: Geography. S. Ç. Keskin (trans.) Social Studies Education for Preschool and Primary Scholl Students, Ankara: Nobel Publications
Semken, S.,Ward, E. G., Moosavi, S., & Chinn, P. W. U. (2017). Place-based education in geoscience: Theory, Research, Practiceand Assessment, Journal Of Geoscience Education, 65:4, 542-562.
Smith, G. A. (2002). Place-baseded ucation: learning to be where we are. PhiDelta Kappan, 83(8), 584-594.
Stapp, A.,Prior, L., & Harmon, C . (2019). There lationship between wellness and physical activity ıntegration coursework and pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy. Journal of Teacher Educationand Educators, 8 (3) , 247-264 .
Şahin, G. E. (2019). Determination of Local Geographical Knowledge Levels of Students in Social Studies, (Unpublished master dissertation). Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Institute of Social Sciences Turkish and Social Studies Education Department, Kırşehir.
Şahin, G. E., & Öztürk Demirbaş, Ç. (2019, October). Local Geographical Knowledge Levels of Students in Social Studies Course: Kırıkkale Example. II. International Congress of Geographical Education (ICGE2019). Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir. Retrieved from http://2019.ucek.org/bildiriler-kitabi/
Tan, M., & Pedretti, E. (2010). Negotiating the complexities of environmental education: A study of Ontario teachers. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(1), 61-78.
Terzian, M.,Giesen, L., & Mbwana, K. (2009). Why teens are not involved in out-of-school time programs: They outh perspective. Child Trends, 38, 1-9.
Tuncel, G., & Dolanbay, H. (2017). Social studies education with out-of-class techniques. R. Sever, M. Aydın and E. Koçoğlu (Eds.) Alternative Approaches to Social Studies Education. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
Uslu, S. (2015). Qualifications of Social Studies Teachers, C. Dönmez and K. Yazıcı (Eds.). Social Studies Teaching. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences. (9th Edition). Ankara: Seçkin Publications.
Yıldırım, H. I. (2020). The effect of using out-of-school learning environments in science teaching on motivation for learning science. Participatory Educational Research, 7(1), 143-161.
Yıldırım, R. (2012). Study of Application for Excursion Observation Method in Primary School 2nd Grade Social Studies (Unpublished master dissertation). Afyon Kocatepe University, Institute of Social Sciences Primary Education Department. Afyonkarahisar.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Other Fields of Education, Studies on Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Gün Erol Şahin ^*
0000-0003-0932-7221
Türkiye

Çağrı Öztürk Demirbaş
0000-0001-8719-4167
Türkiye

Publication Date

January 1, 2021

Submission Date

May 25, 2020

Acceptance Date

September 20, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 8 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.17.8.1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA92DA85ZM

APA

Şahin, G. E., & Öztürk Demirbaş, Ç. (2021). How Social Studies Teachers Reflect Their Immediate Environment: Kırıkkale Case. Participatory Educational Research, 8(1), 292-308. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.17.8.1

AMA

1.Şahin GE, Öztürk Demirbaş Ç. How Social Studies Teachers Reflect Their Immediate Environment: Kırıkkale Case. PER. 2021;8(1):292-308. doi:10.17275/per.21.17.8.1

Chicago

Şahin, Gün Erol, and Çağrı Öztürk Demirbaş. 2021. “How Social Studies Teachers Reflect Their Immediate Environment: Kırıkkale Case”. Participatory Educational Research 8 (1): 292-308. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.17.8.1.

EndNote

Şahin GE, Öztürk Demirbaş Ç (January 1, 2021) How Social Studies Teachers Reflect Their Immediate Environment: Kırıkkale Case. Participatory Educational Research 8 1 292–308.

IEEE

[1]G. E. Şahin and Ç. Öztürk Demirbaş, “How Social Studies Teachers Reflect Their Immediate Environment: Kırıkkale Case”, PER, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 292–308, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.17275/per.21.17.8.1.

ISNAD

Şahin, Gün Erol - Öztürk Demirbaş, Çağrı. “How Social Studies Teachers Reflect Their Immediate Environment: Kırıkkale Case”. Participatory Educational Research 8/1 (January 1, 2021): 292-308. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.17.8.1.

JAMA

1.Şahin GE, Öztürk Demirbaş Ç. How Social Studies Teachers Reflect Their Immediate Environment: Kırıkkale Case. PER. 2021;8:292–308.

MLA

Şahin, Gün Erol, and Çağrı Öztürk Demirbaş. “How Social Studies Teachers Reflect Their Immediate Environment: Kırıkkale Case”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 292-08, doi:10.17275/per.21.17.8.1.

Vancouver

1.Gün Erol Şahin, Çağrı Öztürk Demirbaş. How Social Studies Teachers Reflect Their Immediate Environment: Kırıkkale Case. PER. 2021 Jan. 1;8(1):292-308. doi:10.17275/per.21.17.8.1