Research Article

The History of Turkish Education Course Based on Technopedagogical Education: An Action Research

Volume: 8 Number: 3 August 1, 2021
EN

The History of Turkish Education Course Based on Technopedagogical Education: An Action Research

Abstract

This study aimed to (a) determine how The History of Turkish Education course was taught under the current conditions, (b) identify the current status of the second-year student teachers (hereafter student) of preschool education regarding the technopedagogical education, (c) design history of Turkish education course activities based on technopedagogical education and specify its effect on the learning-teaching process, and (d) specify the opinions of students on the subject. Action research was applied to achieve this purpose. The researcher designed an action plan and implemented it into a two-hour history of Turkish education course that lasted 12 weeks in the 2018-2019 spring term. The study was conducted with 30 students. Content analysis was used to analyze the data obtained through semi-structured interviews and open-ended questionnaire forms. Findings displayed that traditional methods were used to teach the history of the Turkish education course. Besides, students were passive and had no training based on technopedagogical education. The course designed based on these findings positively affected the learning environment. The students became active, collaborated with their classmates, and communicated constantly with their friends and lecturers even outside the class through social media. However, those who were familiar with traditional teaching methods had difficulty in adopting technopedagogical methods at the first stage; they were adapted to these innovations over time. It was suggested that a course with emphasis on theoretical knowledge (e.g., the history of Turkish education) should be taught based on technopedagogical education in such a way that students could be active.

Keywords

technopedagogical education, quality of teaching in higher education, action research

References

  1. Akyüz, Y. (2015). Türk Eğitim Tarihi M.Ö. 1000-M.S.2015 [History of Turkish Education 1000 B.C 2015 A.C]. Ankara: Pegem. Alabas, R. (2016). Türk Eğitim Tarihi dersinin önemi hakkında öğretmen adaylarının görüşleri [Prospective teachers’ perceptions about the importance of History of Turkish Education]. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 5(4), 89-102. doi: 10.30703/cije.321417
  2. Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71-88.
  3. Arıkan, A, Ünver, Ş. & Saraç Süzer, H. S. (2007). Yabancı dil eğitimi programlarında Türk Eğitim Tarihi dersinin önemi ve içeriğine ilişkin öğrenci görüşleri [Students’ views on the importance and content of “Turkish History of Education” course in German and English language teaching curricula]. H. U. Journal of Education, 33, 24-32.
  4. Aslan, E. (2005). Türkiye’de tarih eğitiminin sorunları [Problems of history education in Turkey]. Buca Faculty of Education Journal, 18, 106-114.
  5. Brinkley-Etzkorn, K. E. (2018). Learning to teach online: Measuring the influence of faculty development training on teaching effectiveness through a TPACK lens. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 28-35.
  6. Canbazoğlu-Bilici, S., Yamak, H., & Kavak, N. S., & Guzey, S. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacy scale (TPACK-SeS) for preservice science teachers: Construction, validation and reliability. Eurasian Journal of Education Research, 52, 37-60.
  7. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63-73.
  8. Doğru, E., & Aydın, F. (2017). Examining the skills of geography teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(2), 485-506. doi: 10.7596/taksad.v6i2.686
  9. Ersoy, M., Kabakçı Yurdakul, I. , & Ceylan, B. (2016). Investigating preservice teachers’ TPACK competencies through the lenses of ICT skills: An experimental study. Education and Science, 41(186), 119-135. doi: 10.15390/EB.2016.6345
  10. Graham, R. C., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends, 53(5), 70-79.
APA
Çam, Ş. (2021). The History of Turkish Education Course Based on Technopedagogical Education: An Action Research. Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.51.8.3
AMA
1.Çam Ş. The History of Turkish Education Course Based on Technopedagogical Education: An Action Research. PER. 2021;8(3):1-23. doi:10.17275/per.21.51.8.3
Chicago
Çam, Şefika. 2021. “The History of Turkish Education Course Based on Technopedagogical Education: An Action Research”. Participatory Educational Research 8 (3): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.51.8.3.
EndNote
Çam Ş (August 1, 2021) The History of Turkish Education Course Based on Technopedagogical Education: An Action Research. Participatory Educational Research 8 3 1–23.
IEEE
[1]Ş. Çam, “The History of Turkish Education Course Based on Technopedagogical Education: An Action Research”, PER, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1–23, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.17275/per.21.51.8.3.
ISNAD
Çam, Şefika. “The History of Turkish Education Course Based on Technopedagogical Education: An Action Research”. Participatory Educational Research 8/3 (August 1, 2021): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.51.8.3.
JAMA
1.Çam Ş. The History of Turkish Education Course Based on Technopedagogical Education: An Action Research. PER. 2021;8:1–23.
MLA
Çam, Şefika. “The History of Turkish Education Course Based on Technopedagogical Education: An Action Research”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 8, no. 3, Aug. 2021, pp. 1-23, doi:10.17275/per.21.51.8.3.
Vancouver
1.Şefika Çam. The History of Turkish Education Course Based on Technopedagogical Education: An Action Research. PER. 2021 Aug. 1;8(3):1-23. doi:10.17275/per.21.51.8.3