Research Article

Pre-service science teachers’ processes of establishing simple electric circuits

Volume: 9 Number: 1 January 1, 2022
EN

Pre-service science teachers’ processes of establishing simple electric circuits

Abstract

The aim of this research is to identify pre-service science teachers’ experiences during the simple electrical circuit establishment process, points they were challenged with, and developed strategies they used against the challenges they were experimenting with this process. In this study, embedded single case study, which is one of the qualitative research methods, was used. The case was two weeks of tertiary level Physics Laboratory-2 course, each lasted 1, 5 hours long. 16 female freshman students participated in the study voluntarily. In the laboratory, the students performed their experiments in four groups. The laboratory environment was recorded with one camera, and each group had one audio recorder. The video recordings and sound recordings were then synchronized and evaluated together, descriptive analysis was conducted. In the first week, necessary experimental materials were explained in detail and students made serial and parallel circuits with two resistances, measurements with ammeter and voltmeter. In the second week, students were required to set up different circuits which can be done with 3 resistors, and to make current and potential difference measurements in these circuits. The results of this research were presented with three main headings. First, the students’ processes of establishing simple electrical circuits were described by emphasizing the differences among the groups. Later, students’ difficulties in the process of establishing simple electrical circuits were identified. Finally, examples were given on the strategies of the students to solve the difficulties they were experiencing. It was concluded that systematic procedural techniques like following circuit diagrams or repeated comparisons of diagrams with the circuit may provide productive habits to reduce errors in the process of establishing simple electric circuits.

Keywords

practical skills, physics laboratory, simple electric circuit

References

  1. Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2007). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969.
  2. Abrahams, I., Reiss, M. J., & Sharpe, R. M. (2013). The assessment of practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 209-251.
  3. Abrahams, I., & Reiss M. J.. (2015). The assessment of practical skills. School Science Review, 96 (357), 40-44.
  4. Adler, J., Pournara, C., Taylor, D., Thorne, B., & Moletsane, G. (2009). Mathematics and science teacher education in South Africa: A review of research, policy and practice in times of change. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13, 28–46.
  5. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.
  6. Buffler, A., Allie, S., & Lubben, F. (2001). The development of first year physics students’ ideas about measurement in terms of point and set paradigms. International Journal of Science Education, 23(11), 1137-1155.
  7. Chan, K. K. H., & Hume, A. (2019). Towards a consensus model: Literature review of how science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge is investigated. In A. Hume, R. Cooper & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning PCK in teachers' professional knowledge for teaching science (3–76). Singapore: Springer.
  8. Depaepe, F., & Konig, J. (2018). General pedagogical knowledge, self-efficacy and instructional practice: Disentangling their relationship in pre-service teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 177–190.
  9. Duit, R., Schecker, H., Höttecke, D., & Niedderer, H. (2014). Teaching physics. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (Vol. 2, 434–456). New York, NY: Routledge.
  10. Fadzil, H. M., & Saat, R. M. (2017). Exploring students’ acquisition of manipulative skills during science practical work. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4591-4607.
APA
Ünal, C. (2022). Pre-service science teachers’ processes of establishing simple electric circuits. Participatory Educational Research, 9(1), 271-284. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.15.9.1
AMA
1.Ünal C. Pre-service science teachers’ processes of establishing simple electric circuits. PER. 2022;9(1):271-284. doi:10.17275/per.22.15.9.1
Chicago
Ünal, Cezmi. 2022. “Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Processes of Establishing Simple Electric Circuits”. Participatory Educational Research 9 (1): 271-84. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.15.9.1.
EndNote
Ünal C (January 1, 2022) Pre-service science teachers’ processes of establishing simple electric circuits. Participatory Educational Research 9 1 271–284.
IEEE
[1]C. Ünal, “Pre-service science teachers’ processes of establishing simple electric circuits”, PER, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 271–284, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.17275/per.22.15.9.1.
ISNAD
Ünal, Cezmi. “Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Processes of Establishing Simple Electric Circuits”. Participatory Educational Research 9/1 (January 1, 2022): 271-284. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.15.9.1.
JAMA
1.Ünal C. Pre-service science teachers’ processes of establishing simple electric circuits. PER. 2022;9:271–284.
MLA
Ünal, Cezmi. “Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Processes of Establishing Simple Electric Circuits”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 9, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 271-84, doi:10.17275/per.22.15.9.1.
Vancouver
1.Cezmi Ünal. Pre-service science teachers’ processes of establishing simple electric circuits. PER. 2022 Jan. 1;9(1):271-84. doi:10.17275/per.22.15.9.1