The Mediating Role Of Self-Efficacy In The Relationship Between Problem Solving And Hope

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 47 - 58, 19.02.2020

Zekeriya Çam , Mustafa Eşkisu , Ferhat Kardaş , Özkan Saatçioğlu Sedat Gelibolu

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.4.7.1

Cited By: 4

Öz

The
current study aims to investigate the relationship among problem solving, hope,
and self-efficacy and to test a model for determining the role of self-efficacy
in the relationship between problem solving and hope. It adopted convenience
sampling and consisted of 494 undergraduate students (369 females; 125 males).
The Hope Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale and Problem Solving Inventory were
applied in order to collect the data. Pearson correlation analysis and two-step
Structural Equation Modelling were used for data analysis. Findings revealed
that while a high level of positive correlation existed among problem solving,
self-efficacy and hope, a moderate positive relationship was found between
self-efficacy and hope. As a result of Structural Equation Modelling,
self-efficacy was found to be significantly predicted by problem solving
whereas hope was observed to be significantly predicted by problem-solving and
self-efficacy. In addition, mediation analysis demonstrated that the
relationship between problem solving and hope emerged through the development
of self-efficacy. As a result, this paper exhibited that individuals with
developing problem solving ability had also developing self-efficacy, which in
turn leads to an increase in hope. Therefore, it may be effective to take into
account the components that will improve individuals' problem solving skills
and perceptions about themselves while conducting the studies to raise the hope
level, which is an important concept of psychological health.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hope, Problem solving, Self-efficacy

Kaynakça

• Abdollahi, A., Talib, M. A., Yaacob, S. N., & Ismail, Z. (2016). Problem-solving skills and suicidal ideation among malaysian college students: the mediating role of hopelessness. Academic Psychiatry, 40(2), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-015-0383-0Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
• Atik, G., & Erkan Atik, Z. (2017). Predicting hope levels of high school students: The role of academic self-efficacy and problem solving. Eğitim ve Bilim, 42(190), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.5348
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
• Bandura, Albert. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
• Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). Moderator-mediator variables distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
• Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
• Carr, A. (2013). Positive psychology : The science of happiness and human strengths. London: Routledge.
• Cheng, S. K. (2001). Life stress, problem solving, perfectionism, and depressive symptoms in Chinese. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25(3), 303–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010788513083
• Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300343
• D’Zurilla, T. J., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (1995). Conceptual and methodological issues in social problem-solving assessment. Behavior Therapy, 26(3), 409–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80091-7
• Duan, W., Ho, S. M. Y., Bai, Y., & Tang, X. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese virtues questionnaire. Research On Social Work Practice, 23(3), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731513477214
• Erözkan, A. (2014). Analysis of social problem solving and social self-efficacy in prospective teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(2), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.2.2014
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guliford.Hefferon, K., Boniwell, I. (2011). Positive psychology: Theory, research and applications. New York: McGraw Hill.
• Heppner, P. P., & Lee, D. (2002). Problem-solving appraisal and psychological adjustment. In S. J. Snyder, C. R., & Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 288–298). Oxford University Press.
• Heppner, P. P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.29.1.66
• Heppner, P. P., Pretorius, T. B., Wei, M., Lee, D., & Wang, Y.-W. (2002). Examining the generalizability of problem-solving appraisal in Black South Africans. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49(4), 484–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.49.4.484
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
• Huen, J. M. Y., Ip, B. Y. T., Ho, S. M. Y., & Yip, P. S. F. (2015). Hope and hopelessness: the role of hope in buffering the impact of hopelessness on suicidal ideation. Plos One, 10(6), e0130073. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130073
• Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software.
• Kandemir, M. (2015). Öz yeterlik. In Ş. Ergüner Tekinalp, B., Işık Terzi (Ed.), Eğitimde pozitif psikoloji uygulamaları (pp. 39–69). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Third edition). New York: Guliford.
• Korkut, F. (2002). Lise öğrencilerinin problem çözme becerileri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 177–184.
• Li, M., Eschenauer, R., & Persaud, V. (2018). Between avoidance and problem solving: resilience, self-efficacy, and social support seeking. Journal of Counseling & Development, 96(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12187
• Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Rawski, S. L. (2011). A tale of two paradigms: the impact of psychological capital and reinforcing feedback on problem solving and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 31(4), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2011.619421
• MacKinnon, D. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Routledge.
• Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562
• Nezu, A. M. (2004). Problem solving and behavior therapy revisited. Behaviour Therapy, 35, 1–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80002-9
• O’Sullivan, G. (2011). The relationship between hope, eustress, self-efficacy, and life satisfaction among undergraduates. Social Indicators Research, 101(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9662-z
• Oğuztürk, Ö., Akça, F., Şahin, G. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinde umutsuzluk düzeyi ile problem çözme becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin bazı değişkenler üzerinden incelenmesi. Klinik Psikiyatri, 14, 85–93.
• Pardo, A., & Román, M. (2013). Reflections on the Baron and Kenny model of statistical mediation. Anales de Psicología, 29(2), 614–623. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.2.139241
• Paterson, T. S. E., Yeung, S. E., & Thornton, W. L. (2016). Positive affect predicts everyday problem-solving ability in older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 20(8), 871–879. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2015.1043619
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
• Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Shapiro, D. L., & Watson, A. (2000). Using the theory of planned behavior to induce problem solving in schools. Negotiation Journal, 16(2), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2000.tb00212.x
• Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.
• Snyder, C. R., Cheavens, J., Michael, S. T. (1999). Hoping. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping: The psychology of what works (pp. 205–231). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., & Sigmon, D. R. (2005). Hope theory: A member of the positive psychology family. In Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 257–276). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Snyder, C. R. (1995). Conceptualizing, measuring, and nurturing hope. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73(3), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1995.tb01764.x
• Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 249–275. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1304_01
• Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., … Harney, P. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.570
• Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Sixth edition). Boston: Pearson.
• Teo, D. C. H., Suárez, L., & Oei, T. P. S. (2018). Psychometric properties of the problem solving inventory in a Singapore young male adult sample. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0073-7
• Valle, M. F., Huebner, E. S., & Suldo, S. M. (2006). An analysis of hope as a psychological strength. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.03.005
• Vatan, S., Dağ, İ. (2009). Problem çözme, umutsuzluk, çaresizlik ve talihsizlik MMPI-2 ile ölçülen psikopatolojinin yordayıcıları olabilir mi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 10, 187–197.
• Witty, T. E., Heppner, P. E., Bernard, C. B., & Thoreson, R. W. (2001). Problem-solving appraisal and psychological adjustment of persons with chronic low-back pain. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 8(3), 149–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011361418436
• Yıldırım, F., İlhan, İ. Ö. (2010). Genel özyeterlilik ölçeği Türkçe formunun geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 21(4), 301–308.