The Analysis of the Efficiency of Digital Education Platforms Based on Various Variables

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 383 - 402, 01.05.2022

Elif Büşra Yazıcı , Mehmet Arif Özerbaş

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.72.9.3

Cited By: 2

Abstract

The present study aimed to determine the proficiencies of digital education platforms employed in mathematics courses instructed by classroom teachers based on various variables. For this purpose, the views of classroom teachers on the sub-dimensions of the Digital Education Platform Evaluation Scale (DEPES) were analyzed based on various variables. Correlational survey model was employed in the study. The study group included 601 classroom teachers employed in public and private primary schools in Istanbul during the 2020-2021 academic year. The Digital Education Platform Evaluation Scale (DEPES) was used in the study. SPSS 23 statistics software was utilized to analyze the study data. The differences between the paired variables were determined with the Mann-Whitney U-test, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine the differences between the other variables. The efficiency levels of the digital education platforms employed in primary school mathematics course were analyzed based on content, design, motivation, and teacher proficiency. The analysis of the views of the teachers on the efficiency of the digital education platforms based on the gender, seniority, age, education level, grade of instruction, school type, in-service training variables revealed significant differences between the scores of various platforms. It was determined that teachers who have seniority and age found EBA sufficient, less seniority and younger teachers found Okulistik sufficient. In general, the content of all platforms should be developed. The present study is considered important since the efficiency of digital education platforms frequently employed in the current learning and instruction processes was determined.

Keywords

digital education, digital platforms, teacher proficiency level, contents, design, motivation

References

• Akman, N. (2013). FATİH (Fırsatları arttırma teknolojiyi iyileştirme hareketi) projesi’nin öğretmenler tarafından değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of FATIH (Movement to increase opportunities and improve technology) project by teachers]. Master Thesis, Istanbul University Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul.
• Alabay, A. (2015). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin ve öğrencilerinin eba (eğitimde bilişim ağı) kullanımına ilişkin görüşleri üzerine bir araştırma [A research on the opinions of secondary school teachers and students on the use of eba (information network in education)]. Master Thesis, Istanbul Aydın University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul.
• Altın, H. M. (2014). Öğrenci, öğretmen, yönetici ve veli bakış açısıyla fatih projesinin incelenmesi [Examining the Fatih project from the perspective of students, teachers, administrators and parents]. Master Thesis, Başkent University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• Arslan, E. (2019). Eğitim bilişim ağına ilişkin okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin görüşleri [Opinions of preschool teachers about educational information network]. Master Thesis, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Institute of Social Sciences, Rize.
• Arslan, Z. (2016). Eğitim bilişim ağındaki matematik dersi içeriğine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri: trabzon ili örneği [Teachers' views on the content of mathematics lessons in the educational information network: The case of Trabzon province]. Master Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (13. b.) [Data analysis handbook for social sciences (13. b.)]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2012). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods in education]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Cabı, E. (2015). Dijital teknolojiye yönelik tutum ölçeği [Scale of attitude towards digital technology]. Kastamonu Journal of Education, 24(3), 1229-1244.
• Ceylan, H. (2019). Fen bilgisi öğretmenlerinin eğitim öğretimde, eğitim bilişim ağından yararlanmaya ilişkin görüşleri [Views of science teachers about using educational information network in education]. Master Thesis, Trakya University Institute of Science and Technology, Edirne.
• FATİH (2019). http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/ retrieved on April 11, 2021.
• Homanova, Z. & Prextova, T. (2018 Kasım 30). Educational networking platforms through the eyes of czech primary school students. AIP Conference Proceedings 2040, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic City.
• İşman, A. (2002). Sakarya’da görev yapan öğretmenlerin eğitim teknolojileri yönünden yeterlikleri [Competences of teachers working in Sakarya in terms of educational technologies]. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 1(10), 72-91.
• Karasar, N. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: kavramlar ilkeler teknikler [Scientific research method: concepts principles techniques]. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Third ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
• Kurt, A. A., Kuzu, A., Dursun, Ö. Ö., Güllüpınar, F., & Gültekin, M. (2013). FATİH projesinin pilot uygulama sürecinin değerlendirilmesi: öğretmen görüşleri [Evaluation of the pilot implementation process of the FATIH project: teacher opinions]. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 1(2), 1-23.
• Kuşak, M. (2014). Kelime öğretimi ve teknoloji. İ. S. Ertem (Ed.), Okuma yazma eğitimi ve teknoloji içinde (61-79) [Vocabulary teaching and technology. NS. In S. Ertem (Ed.), Literacy education and technology (61-79)]. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Özerbaş, M.A. (2020). Öğretim Teknolojileri [Instructional Technologies]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Özerbaş, M. A. ve Yazıcı, E. B. (2021). Dijital Eğitim Platformu Değerlendirme Ölçeği’nin (DEPDÖ) geliştirilmesi çalışması [Development of the Digital Education Platform Evaluation Scale (DEPDS)]. Manas Journal of Social Studies,10(2), 901-917.
• Pamuk, C., Çakır, R., Ergun, M., Yılmaz, H.M. Özerbaş, M.A. & Ayas, C. (2013). The use of tablet pc and interactive whiteboard from the perspective of teachers and students: Evaluation of Fatih Project. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1799-1822.
• Saklan, H., Ünal, C. (2019). Dijital eğitim platformları arasında ebanın yeri ile ilgili fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin görüşleri [Opinions of science teachers about the place of eban among digital education platforms]. Journal of OMU Faculty of Education, 38(1), 19-34. doi:10.7822/omuefd.431247.
• Sarı, M.H. (2015). İlkokul 4. sınıfta dienes ilkelerine göre yapılandırılmış geometri etkinliklerinin öğrenci başarısına, kalıcılığa ve akademik benlik algısına etkisi [The effect of geometry activities structured according to dienes principles on student achievement, permanence and academic self-perception in primary school 4th grade]. Doctoral Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z goes to college: John Wiley & Sons.
• Tutar, M. (2015). Eğitim bilişim ağı (eba) sitesine yönelik olarak öğretmenlerin görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of teachers' opinions about the educational information network (eba) website]. Master Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Trabzon.
• Uzundağ, K. (2016). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin sanal manipülatiflere ilişkin görüşleri [Opinions of classroom teachers about virtual manipulatives]. Master Thesis, Adnan Menderes University Institute of Social Sciences, Aydın.
• Yılmaz, T. (2020). Öğrenme ve öğretimde dijitalleşme ve web araçları. M. A. Özerbaş, (Ed.), Öğretim teknolojileri içinde (181-214) [Digitization and web tools in learning and teaching. M. A. Özerbaş, (Ed.), in Instructional Technologies (181-214)]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Yorgancı, F. (2019). Ortaokul matematik öğretmenlerinin eğitim bilişim ağı projesinden yararlanma düzeyleri ve proje hakkındaki görüşleri [Secondary school mathematics teachers' level of benefit from the educational information network project and their opinions about the project]. Master Thesis, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Van.