The Role of Online Information Searching Strategies and Digital Literacy Levels in Predicting Students' Lifelong Learning Competencies

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 1 - 15, 01.07.2023

Hakan Tekedere Hanife Göker

Öz

Lifelong learning (LL), which emphasizes the spread of learning throughout life, is a continuous process that aims to develop or change the competencies that individuals have or want to have throughout their lives. This study focused to investigate the extent to which online information-searching strategies (OISS) and digital literacy (DL) can predict LL competencies. The sample consists of 1658 high school students. The convenience sampling approach was used to select the sample. The dataset was collected using the “Key Competencies Scale in Lifelong Learning”, “Online Information Searching Strategies Inventory”, and “Digital Literacy Scale”. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients, and stepwise multiple regression analysis. The results indicated that DL levels and OISS significantly predicted LL competencies. In predicting LL competencies, it was concluded that the best predictor was DL levels. DL independent variable explained 27.7% of the total variance. Also, it was determined that DL levels and OISS explained 34.2% of the total variance of LL competencies and that independent variables affected the dependent variable at a large level (R2 = .342 > .26). In line with the findings of the research, suggestions were made to determine and increase DL levels and OISS to increase their LL competencies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

: lifelong learning, online information searching, information searching strategies, digital literacy, regression analysis

Kaynakça

• Adams, D. (2007). Lifelong learning competencies and attributes: The perceptions of Australian secondary school teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 17(2), 149-160. doi:10.3316/ielapa.200801714
• Araniri, N., Nahriyah, S., Jamaludin, G. M., & Jatisunda, M. G. (2021, March). The impact of digital literacy ability of Islamic religious education students on FIQH learning achievements. In 1st Paris Van Java International Seminar on Health, Economics, Social Science and Humanities (PVJ-ISHESSH 2020) (pp. 254-257). Atlantis Press. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.210304.053
• Aşkar, P. & Mazman, S.G. (2013). Adaptation of online information searching strategy inventory into Turkish. Education and Science, 38(168), 167-182. Retrieved from http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/1288/588
• Chae, S.E. & Kang, G. (2018). Determinants of older Korean adults’ participation in life-long learning programmes and life satisfaction. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 37(6), 689-700. doi: 10.1080/02601370.2018.1528306
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
• Chen, Z. & Liu, Y. (2019). The different style of lifelong learning in China and the USA based on influencing motivations and factors. International Journal of Educational Research, 95, 13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2019.03.005
• Çoklar, A.N., Yaman, N.D., & Yurdakul, I.K. (2017). Information literacy and digital nativity as determinants of online information search strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.050
• Dinata, K. B. (2021). Literasi digital dalam pembelajaran daring. Eksponen, 11(1), 20-27. doi: 10.47637/eksponen.v11i1.368
• Çebi, A. & Özdemir, T.B. (2019). The role of digital nativity and digital citizenship in predicting high school students’ online information searching strategies. Education and Science, 44(200). 47-57. doi: 10.15390/EB.2019.8379
• Çetin, F. & Demirtaş, Z. (2022) The relationship of lifelong learning competencies with learning approaches and self-efficacy. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 12(3), 748-768. doi: 10.19126/suje.1158777
• Demirel, M. (2011). Lifelong learning and its reflections on Turkish elementary education curricula. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 1(1), 87-105. Retrieved from
• https://www.ijocis.com/index.php/ijocis/article/view/55
• Derrick, M.G. (2003). Creating environments conductive for lifelong learning. New directions for adult and continuing education. Wiley Periodicals. 100-101. doi:10.1002/ace.115
• Deveci, T. & Ayish, N. (2017). Correlation between critical thinking and lifelong learning competencies of freshman students. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 6(1), 282-303. doi: 10.14686/buefad.291775
• Dhamanitayakul, C. (2019). Innovative multiplatform media for digital citizenship promotion among Thai digital natives. RSU International Research Conference. 1385-1393.
• Durak, H. Y., Saritepeci, M., & Dünya, B. A. (2021). Examining the relationship between computational thinking, lifelong learning competencies and personality traits using path analysis. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 10(2), 281-292. Retrieved from
• https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/buefad/issue/62268/888374
• Erdogan, D. G. & Ayanoglu, Ç. (2021). The examination of relationship between lifelong learning trends of school administrators and teachers, and their innovative and entrepreneurial behavior levels. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(2), 331-351. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2020.332.21
• Erwin, K., & Mohammed, S. (2022). Digital literacy skills instruction and increased skills proficiency. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 6(2), 323-332. doi: 10.46328/ijtes.364
• European Commission. (2018). A memorandum on lifelong learning. Brussels. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018S C0014
• Garzón-Artacho, E., Sola-Martínez, T., Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., & Gómez-García, G. (2021). Teachers' perceptions of digital competence at the lifelong learning stage. Heliyon, 7(7), e07513. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07513
• Guess, A. M., & Munger, K. (2023). Digital literacy and online political behavior. Political Science Research and Methods, 11(1), 110-128. doi:10.1017/psrm.2022.17
• Habibzadeh, A., & Abdolrahmani, R. (2020). The information literacy model of faculty members: A case of Amin University. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 18(1), 49-64.
• Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson Education Limited. 197-200.
• Hamutoğlu, N.B., Güngören, Ö.C., Uyanık, G.K., & Erdoğan, D.G. (2017). Adapting digital literacy scale into Turkish. Ege Journal of Education, 18(1), 408-429. doi: 10.12984/egeefd.295306
• Kesici, A. (2022). The effect of digital literacy on creative thinking disposition: the mediating role of lifelong learning disposition. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 7(2), 260-273.
• Kim, K. T. (2019). The structural relationship among digital literacy, learning strategies, and core competencies among South Korean college students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 19(2), 3-21. doi: 10.12738/estp.2019.2.001
• Kline, R.B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press. 73-75.
• Kozikoglu, I., & Onur, Z. (2019). Predictors of lifelong learning: Information literacy and academic self-efficacy. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(4), 492-506. doi: 10.18844/cjes.v11i4.3460
• Kuek, A., & Hakkennes, S. (2020). Healthcare staff digital literacy levels and their attitudes towards information systems. Health Informatics Journal, 26(1), 592-612. doi: 10.1177/1460458219839613
• Lazić, S., Talić, T., & Marinković, D. (2021). The importance of information technologies in knowledge management. In The 1st International Conference on Maritime Education and Development: ICMED (pp. 237-244). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-64088-0_22
• Malykhin, O., Aristova, N., & Alieksieieva, S. (2022, May). Boosting lifelong learning for general secondary schoolteachers: Digital competence development amid blended learning. In Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 819-827). doi: 10.17770/sie2022vol1.6859
• Mehdi, M. (2023). Saving the world through technology: The aspect of e-learning in education. International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, 8(6), 7-11. doi: 10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.86.2001
• Moustakas, L. (2018). Motivation and obstacles to adult participation in lifelong learning programs: The effect of gender and age. Open Journal for Educational Research, 2(1), 45-56. doi: 10.32591/coas.ojer.0201.04045m
• Neculau, B. C., & Anghel, G. A. (2022). Requirements of lifelong learning in the knowledge society. Journal of Education, Society & Multiculturalism, 3(1), 169-180. doi: 10.2478/jesm-2022-0010
• Neves, C., & Henriques, S. (2020). Exploring the impacts of distance higher education on adult learners' lives and reclaiming lifelong learning as a human development process. Open Praxis, 12(4), 439-456. doi: 10.5944/openpraxis.12.4.1084
• Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives’ digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065-1078. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
• Oberländer, M., Beinicke, A., & Bipp, T. (2020). Digital competencies: A review of the literature and applications in the workplace. Computers & Education, 146, 103752. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103752
• Ocak, G., & Karakuş, G. (2019). An investigation of digital literacy self-efficacy skills of pre-service teachers in terms of different variables. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences, 21(1), 129-147. doi: 10.32709/akusosbil.466549
• Parisi, G.I., Kemker, R., Part, J.L., Kanan, C., & Wermter, S. (2019). Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: A review. Neural Networks, 113, 54-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.01.012
• Partnership for 21st Century Competencies (P21). (2015). P21 framework definitions. Retrieved from http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_ Definitions_ New_Logo_2015 9pgs.pdf.
• Reid, L., Button, D., & Brommeyer, M. (2023). Challenging the myth of the digital native: A narrative review. Nursing Reports, 13(2), 573-600. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13020052
• Roberts, A., & Roberts, J. M. (2021). Multiple regression: A practical introduction. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Rogers, A. (2014). The base of the iceberg: Informal learning and its impact on formal and non-formal learning. Verlag Barbara Budrich. 15-30.
• Sarı, Ü., Türker, H., & Coşan, C.A. (2019). A study on digital literacy levels: Turkey’s first digital literacy map. Current Debates in Film & Media Studies, 59-74.
• Semerci, Ç., & Semerci, N. (2021). Development of the digital literacy barriers scale: A validity and reliability study. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 10(3), 471-481. doi: 10.14686/buefad.934504
• Shrestha, N. (2020). Detecting multicollinearity in regression analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 8(2), 39-42. doi: 10.12691/ajams-8-2-1
• Singh, J. & Ramaiah, C. K. (2021). Media and information literacy. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 41(4), 237-239. doi: 10.14429/djlit.41.4.17381
• Şahin, M., Akbaşlı, S., & Yanpar-Yelken T. (2010). Key competences for lifelong learning: The case of prospective teachers. Educational Research and Review, 5(10), 545-556. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ911877
• Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2018). Using multivariate statistics. 7th Edition. Boston: Pearson.
• Taşçı, G. & Titrek, O. (2020). Evaluation of lifelong learning centers in higher education: a sustainable leadership perspective. Sustainability, 12(1), 1-18. doi:10.3390/su12010022
• Topal, A.D., & Süner, M. (2021). Information searching and commitment strategies of maritime faculty students on the web. Information Development, 37(3), 431-443. doi: 10.1177/0266666920903782
• Tsai, M.J. (2009). Online information searching strategy inventory (OISSI): A quick version and a complete version. Computers & Education, 53, 473-483. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.006
• Tsai, M.J. & Tsai, C.C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43-50. doi:10.1080/1355800032000038822
• Üstündağ, M.T., Güneş, E., & Bahçivan, E. (2017). Turkish adaptation of digital literacy scale and investigating pre-service science teachers’ digital literacy. Journal of Education and Future, 12, 19-29. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12513/1728
• Yap, J. S., & Tan, J. (2022). Lifelong learning competencies among chemical engineering students at Monash University Malaysia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 38, 60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ece.2021.10.004