School Principals’ Perspective on Technological Leadership, Technostress and Information and Communication Technology: A scoping review

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 5, 147 - 167, 01.09.2023

Erol Ata Fatih Saltan

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.79.10.5

Öz

School principals act as the leader of students and teachers and always focuses on the academic achievement of students while making decisions in different areas of the school. A school principal's leadership skills, communication skills, analytical thinking skills, co-operation skills, creativity, flexibility, and openness to learning are important keys to success in schools and thus in education. In this last century, it has become impossible to think of all these skills independently of technology. With this quick glance in mind, the aim of this scoping review was to present a thorough analysis of pertinent theses and dissertations completed in Turkey that addressed the viewpoint of school principals on technological leadership, technostress, and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) proficiency. The five-stage framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) serves as the basis for the scoping review. Research questions are first determined. Second, the Council of Higher Education (HEC) database's most recent 20 years are investigated using the search term "School Principal." Third, studies are examined using inclusion and exclusion criteria, and articles are chosen using the PRISMA (2009) approach. Fourth, selected articles are analyzed in terms of a variety of metrics and summaries. In light of the study questions, the findings are then provided. The results of the scoping review are described in relation to a number of dimensions examined by the research questions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

school principal, technological leadership, technostress, ICT competence, school administrators

Kaynakça

• Açıkalın, A. (1998). Toplumsal kurumsal ve teknik yönleriyle okul yöneticiliği[Social, organisational and technical aspects of school management]. Pegem Yayıncılık,Ankara.
• Ağar, M. (2009). The opinions of the school principals about the use of information technologies. Master Thesis, Gaziosmanpaşa University.
• Akbaba-Altun, S. (2004). Information technology classrooms and elementary school principals' roles: Turkish experience. Education and Information Technologies, 9, 255-270.
• Akkaya, A. E. (2010). Development of school managers? skills and attitudes of information technologies: An educational application. Master Thesis, Akdeniz University
• Akdemir, E. (2015). Determination of in-service training needs of school administrators for technology and a proposal for the in-service training program. Doctoral Dissertation, Necmettin Erbakan University.
• Aktaş, N. (2016). The evaluati̇on of the secondary school principals' technological leadership roles. Master Thesis, Marmara University.
• Aktaş, N., and Karaca, F. (2022). The relationship between Turkish high school administrators' technology leadership self-efficacies and their attitudes and competencies towards technology use in education. Participatory Educational Research, 9(5), 430-448.
• Almasri, F. (2022). Simulations to teach science subjects: Connections among students’ engagement, self-confidence, satisfaction, and learning styles. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 7161-7181.
• Arpa, M.(2020). School administrators and teachers' views on educational technologies and autonomy perceptions. Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi University.
• Arksey, H., and O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology, 8(1), 19-32.
• Atay, K. (2001). İlköğretim okulu müdürlerinin genel ve iş tutum ve davranışları[General and work attitudes and behaviours of primary school principals]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 28(28), 471-482.
• Ayşin-Altun, N. (2009). School administrators and teachers' views on educational technologies and autonomy perceptions. Master Thesis, Gazi University.
• Balaban, N.U. (2012). Assesing the relationship between technology leadership roles and computer anxiety levels of aministrators. Master Thesis, Anadolu University.
• Balmes, S. R. (2022). Technology Integration and Transformative Innovation in Education. Technology Integration and Transformative Innovation in Education, 106(1), 5-5.
• Biberoğlu, A. B.(2022). Evalution of the situtaion of school administrator's use of technological leadership behaviors during the pandemic. Master Thesis, İstanbul Aydın University.
• Bibri, S. E. (2022). The social shaping of the metaverse as an alternative to the imaginaries of data-driven smart Cities: A study in science, technology, and society. Smart Cities, 5(3), 832-874.
• Bolaji, H. O., and Bolaji, T. O. (2022). Information and Communication Technology Utilization for Managerial Planning Among Educational Administrators in Secondary Schools in Ilorin Metropolis. International Journal of Informatics, Information System and Computer Engineering, 3(2), 50-64.
• Bostancı, H. (2010). A review on school principals in terms of technology leadership adequacy. Gazi University, Ankara.
• Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2002). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış [ New structure and behaviour in school management]. Pegem Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Cantürk, G. (2007). The usage of computer technology in school administration, primary school administrators' attitudes towards computer technology, administrators' and teachers' computer usage level. Master Thesis, Akdeniz University
• Cantürk, G. (2016). School administrators' technological leadership behaviours and the relationship among usage of information and communication technology at management processes. Doctoral Dissertation, Akdeniz University.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc.
• Çağtaş, Ö. (2019). Investigation of self competencies of school managers using information technologies. Master Thesis, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University.
• Çetin,D. (2017). Investigation of the relationship between school administrators' technostress perceptions and their individual innovative features (Edirne case). Master Thesis, Trakya University.
• Demiraçan, A. (2019). Investigation of the relationship between technology leadership strategies and innovation management beliefs of school administrators. Master Thesis, Trakya University.
• Durak, D.(2022). School principals' technological leadership self-efficacies and 21st century teacher skills. Master Thesis, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University.
• Dülgar, M. (2020). A study on school administrators 'technology leadership self competences . Master Thesis, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University.
• Doğruöz, O. (2021). An investigation of school managers information technologies leadership and self efficacy in terms of different variables. Master Thesis, Bolu İzzet Baysal University.
• Ergişi, K. (2005). Identification of technological competencies of school administrators related with the active usage of information technologies in schools .Master Thesis, Kırıkkale University.
• Ermiş U.F.(2021). Investigation of information and communication technologies selfefficacy perceptions of school administrators and teachers. Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi University.
• Fowler Jr, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage publications.
• Gonzales, M. M. (2020). School technology leadership vision and challenges: Perspectives from American school administrators. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(4), 697-708.
• Görgülü, D. (2013). The research of the school administrators' technologic leadership competence in the course of transition to information society: A case study of Konya. Master Thesis, , Atatürk University.
• Gürsel, R. S. (2020). Relationship between school administrators' technology leadership competencies and media and technology use and attitudes. Master Thesis, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University.
• Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers.
• Kanber, A. (2021). A research of the relationship between managerial powerfullness and technology literacy levels of school administrators. Master Thesis, İstanbul Aydın University.
• Kiroğlu, O. (2014). Determination of school admi̇ni̇strators qualification on information technologies. Master Thesis, Bahçeşehir University.
• Koyuncuoğlu, A. (2021). Views of school administrators about duties and responsibilities on technology integration in education. Master Thesis, Gazi University.
• Kuday, N. (2020). Evaluation of school administrators' views on technology-based stress according to various variables. Master Thesis, Harran University.
• Koszalka, T. A., and Wang, X. (2002). Integrating technology into learning: A summary view of promises and problems. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 179-183.
• Maala, E. B., & Lagos, F. D. (2022). Technological Leadership of School Heads and Teachers’ Technology Integration: Basis for the Development of a Training Program. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(10), 2074-2089.
• Meet, R. K., Kala, D., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2022). Exploring factors affecting the adoption of MOOC in Generation Z using extended UTAUT2 model. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 10261-10283.
• Meyers, E. M., Erickson, I. and Small, R. V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: An introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 355-367. doi:10.1080/ 17439884.2013.783597
• Mullen, C. A., and Cairns, S. S. (2010). The principal's apprentice: Mentoring aspiring school administrators through relevant preparation. Mentoring and Tutoring.
• Sayracı, N. (2018). School administrators' managing alteration competencies and technological leadership. Master Thesis, Yıldız Teknik University.
• Seven, T. (2021). The relationship between school managers' technological leadership self-efficiency and their distance education attitudes. Master Thesis, İstanbul Kültür University.
• Şahin, H. (2015). Assessment of school administrators of technology leadership views regarding the role of principals and teachers. Master Thesis ,Zirve University.
• Şahin, M. (2023). A study on the role of school administrators in school improvement. The Journal of International Education Science, 10 (34), 382-398.
• International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2014). ISTE standards for administrators. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/Standards.
• Tan, C. Y., Gao, L., & Shi, M. (2020). Second-order meta-analysis: Synthesising the evidence on associations between school leadership and different school outcomes. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership. doi: 10.1177/1741143220935456
• Turhan, E. (2005). Opinions of school administrators on managerial processes and distance education technologies-the province Eskişehir case- .Doctoral Dissertation, Anadolu University.
• Uğur, C. (2010). The effect of computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety to computer technology using levels of school principals (Case of Burdur province) . Master Thesis, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University.
• Ulukaya, F. (2015). The relationship between the self efficacy levels about school directors and the levels of performing education. Master Thesis, Gazi Osman Paşa University.
• Utomo, S. (2022). Leadership Role of School Principles to Motivate Teachers Promotion at Public Junior High School 4 Kudus in 2021. ANP Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 3, 30-39.
• Sen, K., Prybutok, G., & Prybutok, V. (2022). The use of digital technology for social wellbeing reduces social isolation in older adults: A systematic review. SSM-population health, 17, 101020.
• Sunal, G. (2015). The determination of the secondary school administors' competence use of information technologies (an example of Uşak city). Master Thesis, Ayfon Kocatepe University.
• Öz, H. (2015). Assessment by the school administrators'perspective of the issues regarding application process of the FATİH Project: Tekirdağ / Süleymanpaşa example. Master Thesis, Namık Kemal University.
• Öz, Ö., and Arastaman, G. (2022). School Principals' Opinions on Data-based School Management: A Case Study. Participatory Educational Research, 9(3), 132-147.
• Özdoğru, M. (2022). School Administrators' Behaviors in the Professional Belonging of Teachers. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(2).
• Valentine, J. (2001). Frameworks for continuous school improvement: A synthesis of essential concepts. Middle Level Leadership Center publications (MU).
• Vanblaere, B., & Devos, G. (2016). Relating school leadership to perceived professional learning community characteristics: A multilevel analysis. Teaching and teacher education, 57, 26-38.
• Wang, Q., and Woo, H. L. (2007). Systematic planning for ICT integration in topic learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(1), 148-156.
• Yu, C. and Durrington, V. A. (2006). Technology Standards for School Administrators: An Analysis of Practicing and Aspiring Administrators’ Perceived Ability to Perform the Standards. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F019263650629539
• Yumlu, E. (2020). Investigation of the relationship between of school administrators' technological leadership qualifications and school efficiency. Master Thesis, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University.
• Yumuşak, Ş.(2022). The relationship between school managers' perceptions of technological leadership self-efficiency and perceptions to manage change. Master Thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University.