Investigation of Preservice Science Teachers’ Scientific Literacy Skills in terms of Academic Achievement, University Entrance Exam Scores and Grade Level

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 6, 124 - 139, 01.11.2023

Halil Turgut , Merve Lütfiye Şentürk

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.92.10.6

Abstract

The first aim of this research is to investigate preservice science teachers’ scientific literacy skills in terms of university entrance exam scores, academic achievement average scores, grade levels and academic achievement levels. And the second one is to determine the predictive power of university entrance exam scores and academic achievement average scores on scientific literacy skills. In line with these listed aims of the research, this study was carried out in survey design of the quantitative paradigm. 154 preservice science teachers constituted the participants of this research. The participants’ skills scores were obtained with “Scientific Literacy Skills Test” and the research hypotheses were tested statistically. Results revealed that participants’ scientific literacy skills differed in favor of upper classes, there was significant but low relationship between their skills and academic achievement average scores. In addition, it was found that participants’ university entrance exam scores did not significantly predict their skills, academic achievement average scores significantly predicted their skills but at a low rate (7%) and there was no significant relationship between their university entrance exam scores and skills. In line with these results, suggestions were made regarding the revision of universities' science teaching programs with the object to advance preservice science teachers' scientific literacy skills.

Keywords

academic achievement, higher education, preservice science teacher, science education, scientific literacy skills.

References

• Adnan, Mulbar, U., Sugiarti, & Bahri, A. (2021). Biology science literacy of junior high school students in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1752(2021) 012084, 1- 9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1752/1/012084
• Al Sultan, A., Henson Jr, H., & Fadde, P. J. (2018). Preservice elementary teachers’ scientific literacy and self-efficacy in teaching science. IAFOR Journal of Education, 6(1), 25-41. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1172004.pdf
• Altun-Yalçın, S., Açışlı, S., & Turgut, Ü. (2011). Determining the levels of pre-service science teachers’ scientific literacy and investigating effectuality of the education faculties about developing scientific literacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 783-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.185
• American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Arduç, M. A., & Kahraman, S. (2021). The content analysis of studies conducted in the field of scientific literacy in Turkey. Inonu University Journal of the Graduate School of Education, 8(16),16-43. https://doi.org/10.29129/inujgse.934792
• Bağcı-Kılıç, G., Haymana, F., & Bozyılmaz, B. (2008). Analysis of the Elementary Science and Technology Curriculum of Turkey with Respect to Different Aspects of Scientific Literacy and Scientific Process. Education and Science, 33(150), 52-63. http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/630
• Baz, M. (2003). Determination of scientific literacy levels of primary school 7th and 8th grade students [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Marmara University.
• Boujaoude, S. (2002). Balance of scientific literacy themes in science curricula: the case of Lebanon. International Journal of Science Education, 24(2), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110066494
• Bybee, R. (2016). Scientific literacy. R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Science Education (pp. 944– 946). Springer
• Bybee, R. W. (2008). Scientific literacy, environmental issues, and PISA 2006: The 2008 Paul F-Brandwein lecture. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 566-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9124-4
• Çağatay, N. (1990). Overview of Turkish higher education history. Belleten, 54(211), 1209-1220. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1802024
• Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
• DeBoer G.E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
• Dillon, J. (2009). On scientific literacy and curriculum reform. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 201-213. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ884393.pdf
• Dombaycı, M. A., & Ercan, O. (2017). Examining the scientific literacy levels and attitudes towards scientific research of the teacher candidates’ in terms of various variables. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty Education, 17(3), 1265-1284. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2017.17.31178-338822
• Firdaus, L., Ibrohim, I., Lestari, S. R., Masiah, M., Primawati, S. N., & Hunaepi, H. (2023). A Quantitative study on the scientific literacy skills of prospective biology teachers. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.1891
• Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., ve Hyun, H. (2014). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
• Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates' evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE-Life Science Education, 11(4), 364– 377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026
• Harefa, E., & Huang, X. (2023). Fostering scientific literacy in university students majoring in elementary education based on mental state. Buana Pendidikan: Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Unipa Surabaya, 19(1), 106-114. https://doi.org/10.36456/bp.vol19.no1.a6803
• Hasançebi, B., Terzi, Y., & Küçük, Z. (2020). Distractor Analysis Based on Item Difficulty Index and Item Discrimination Index. Gümüşhane University Journal of Science, 10(1), 224-240. https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.615465
• Howell, E. L., Brossard, D. (2021). (Mis)informed about what? What it means to be a science-literate citizen in a digital World. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(5), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912436117
• Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82, 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<407::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-G
• Jufrida, J., Basuki, F. R., Kurniawan, W., Pangestu, M. D., & Fitaloka, O. (2019). Scientific literacy and science learning achievement at junior high school. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(4), 630-636. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20312
• Karamustafaoǧlu, O. (2007). Evaluation of novice physics teachers’ teaching skills. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 899(1), 501-502. American Institute of Physics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2733256
• Keskin, H., Tezel, Ö., & Acat, M. (2016). Secondary students’ level of scientific literacy related to science and tecnology course. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 47,1-18. https://doi.org/10.9761/jasss3513
• Kim, S. L., Kim D. (2021). English learners’ science-literacy practice through explicit writing instruction in invention-based learning. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100029
• Kirch, S. A. (2007). Re/Production of science process skills and a scientific ethos in an early childhood classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 785-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100029
• Köklü, N., Büyüköztürk, Ş. & Çokluk Bökeoğlu, Ö. (2006). Statistics for the social sciences. Ankara: Pegem.
• Laugksch, R.C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Scientific thinking and science literacy. In K. A. Renninger, I. E. Sigel, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Child psychology in practice (pp. 153–196). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Liu, X. (2009). Beyond science literacy: Science and the public. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 301-311. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ884399.pdf
• Maranan, V. M. (2017). Basic process skills and attitude toward science: Inputs to an enhanced students’ cognitive performance [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Laguna State Polytechnic University.
• Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science? International Journal of Science Education, 28 (13), 1499–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718344
• Ministry of National Education (2018). Science lesson curriculum (primary and secondary school 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8th grades). Ankara.
• Mukti, W. R., Yuliskurniawati, I. D., Noviyanti, N. I., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2019, June). A survey of high school students’ scientific literacy skills in different gender. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1241(2019) 012043, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012043
• Namal, Y., & Karakök, T. (2011). Atatürk and the university reform (1933). Journal of Higher Education and Science, 1(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2011.003
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Science literacy: Concepts, contexts, and consequences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• Nunes, T. (1999). Mathematics learning as the socialization of the mind. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6, 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524712
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012: Assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014): Student performance in mathematics, reading and science. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015: Assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematics and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Özbay, H. E. (2011). The relationship between understanding of the evolution and the levels of scientific literacy of students in secondary school (the case of Malatya) [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Inonu University.
• Özcan, I., & Turgut, H. (2014). Assessing Preservice Science Teachers’ Nature of Science Understanding: A Study of Scale Development. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 4(2), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.93713
• Özdemir, O. (2010). The state of science literacy of pre-service science and technology teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(3), 42-56. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/5765
• Özmen, H. & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (Ed.) (2019). Research Methods in Education (Eğitimde Araştırma Yöntemleri). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Punch, K. F. (2003). Survey research: The basics. Sage.
• Roth, W. M., & Barton, A. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York & London: Routledge Falmer.
• Ryder J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260108560166
• Salvucci, S., Walter, E., Conley, V., Fink, S., & Saba, M. (1997). Measurement error studies at the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Washington D. C.: U. S. Department of Education.
• Sargın, S. (2007). The development process and regional distribution of universities in Turkey. Journal of Suleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, 3(5), 133-150. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/215613
• Segarra, V. A., Hughes, N. M., Ackerman, K. M., Grider, M. H., Lyda, T., & Vigueira, P. A. (2018). Student performance on the test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS) does not change with assignment of a low-stakes grade. BMC Research Notes, 11(1), 422. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3545-9.
• Shen, B. S. (1975). Views: Science literacy: Public understanding of science is becoming vitally needed in developing and industrialized countries alike. American scientist, 63(3), 265-268. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27845461
• Süren, T. (2008). Scientific literacy levels of elementary school students at primary schools. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Afyon Kocatepe University.
• Tan, S. (2009). Misuses of KR-20 and Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients. Eğitim ve Bilim, 34(152), 101-112. https://acikerisim.uludag.edu.tr/bitstream/11452/23105/2/Tan_2009.pdf
• TDK. Turkish Language Association Dictionaries. Access: 20 March 2023. https://sozluk.gov.tr/. 20.03.2023
• Tekin, N., Aslan, O., & Yağız, D. (2016). Investigation of pre-service science teachers’ scientific literacy level and critical thinking tendency. Amasya Education Journal, 5(1), 23-50. https://doi.org/10.17539/aej.76710
• Turgut, D. (2018). Investigation of class-based to science teacher candidates' bioethical values, scientific literacy levels and empathy skills [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Pamukkale University.
• Turgut, H. & Fer, S. (2006). The effect of social constructivist instructional design application to prospective science teachers’ scientific literacy proficiencies. Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 24(24), 205-229. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2035
• Turgut, H. (2007). Scientific literacy for all. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Science, 40(2), 233-256. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000176
• Turgut, H. (2021). Scientific Literacy. E. K. Memiş (Ed.), Science education for 21st century skills: Deepening learning (pp. 2-27). Ankara: Pegem.
• Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific literacy and social transformation, critical perspectives about science participation and emancipation. Science & Education, 30, 557-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00205-2
• Walag, A. M. P., Fajardo, M. T. M., Bacarrisas, P. G., & Guimary, F. M. (2022). A canonical correlation analysis of filipino science teachers' scientific literacy and science teaching efficacy. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 249-266. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15314a
• Yazıcı, B., & Yolacan, S. (2007). A comparison of various tests of normality. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 77(2), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10629360600678310