The Effect of Computer-Supported Stem Applications on Secondary Students' Achievement and Computational Thinking Skills

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 4, 160 - 183, 07.07.2024

Gizem Berk , Aslan Gülcü

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.54.11.4

Abstract

In this study, the effect of STEM applications integrated with computer- supported materials on mathematics achievement in the subject of ratio-proportion and percentages was examined. In addition, it was aimed to reveal the effect of these applications on computational thinking skills. Furthermore, we aimed to reach the opinions of the experimental group students about the materials they used, STEM applications, and the application process. A mixed method was used with a sample consisting of 89 students in grade 7 of a secondary school. An achievement test, a scale of levels of computational thinking, and learning diaries were used as tools for data collection. The data were analyzed using t-test and content analysis. It was found that there was a significant difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of achievement in favor of the experimental groups. In terms of computational thinking, there was a significant difference in favor of the experimental groups, except for the creativity aspect of computational thinking skills. Based on the findings obtained with the computational thinking skills scale the study had a positive impact on most aspects of computational thinking. Accessed through the learning diaries students' views on learning with STEM applications were generally positive. In particular, the opinions on computer-supported materials pointed to a very satisfactory process. The findings suggest that the inclusion of STEM activities and the use of computer technology in education contribute to students' computational thinking skills and learning.

Keywords

academic success, STEM, computational thinking skills, computer assisted mathematics learning object

References

• Acar, D., Tertemiz, N., & Taşdemir, A. (2018). The Effects of STEM Training on the Academic Achievement of 4th Graders in Science and Mathematics and their Views on STEM Training. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(4), 505-513. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018438141
• Akgündüz, D., Aydeniz, M., Çakmakçı, G., Çavaş, B., Corlu, M. S., Öner, T. &. Özdemir, S. (2015). A report on STEM Education in Turkey: A provisional agenda or a necessity?[White Paper]. : Aydın University. Istanbul, Turkey. http://www.aydin.edu.tr/belgeler/IAUSTEM-Egitimi-Turkiye-Raporu2015.pdf
• Ashford, V. D. (2016). STEM After School Programming: The Effect on Student Achievement and Attitude (Publication No. 1790627591)[Doctoral dissertation, Wingate University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
• Aydın, G., Saka, M., & Guzey, S. (2017). Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematic (STEM) Attitude Levels in Grades 4 - 8. Mersin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 13(2), 787-802. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.290319
• Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Integrative Approaches Among Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Subjects on Students’ Learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(5), 23-37.
• Bicer, A. & Capraro, R. M. (2019). Mathematics Achievement in The Secondary High School Context of STEM and Non‐STEM Schools. School Science and Mathematics, 119(2), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12321
• Biklen, S. K., & Bogdan, R. (2007). Qualitative Research For Education: An İntroduction to Theories and Methods. Boston, MA: Pearson A & B.
• Boling S. E., & Boling, J.L. (1993). Creativity and Birth Order/Sex Differences in Children. Education, 114(2), 224-226.
• Bransford, J., Brown, A. & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
• Brown, R., Brown, J., Reardon, K., & Merrill, C. (2011). Understanding STEM: current perceptions. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(6), 5-9.
• Cohen, L. M., & Manion, L. (1998). L.(1989) Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.
• Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM Education: İmplications for Educating Our Teachers for The Age of İnnovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74-85.
• Cotabish, A., Dailey, D., Robinson, A., & Hughes, G. (2013). The Effects of a STEM İntervention on Elementary Students' Science Knowledge And Skills. School Science and Mathematics, 113(5), 215-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12023
• Creswell, J.W. (2017). Karma yöntem araştırmalarına giriş[Introduction to Mixed Methods Research] (Sozbılır, M., Trans.). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
• Çakır, R., & Ozan, C. E. (2018). The Effect of STEM Applications on 7th Grade Students’ Academic Achievement, Reflective Thinking Skills and Motivations. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty GUJGEF, 38(3), 1077-1100. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.346067
• Çimentepe, E. (2019). The Effect of STEM Activities on Academic Achievement, Scientific Process Skills and Computational Thinking Skills (Publication No. 552833) [Master's thesis, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University].
• Daşdemir, İ., Cengiz, E., Uzoğlu, M., & Bozdoğan, A. E. (2012). Examination of Science Teachers' Opinions Related to Tablet Pcs Using in Science and Technology Courses. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9(20), 495-511.
• Davis, S. J. H. (1997). How mastering technology can transform math class. Educational Leadership, 55(3), 49-51.
• Elliott, B., Oty, K., McArthur, J., & Clark, B. (2001). The effect of an interdisciplinary algebra/science course on students' problem solving skills, critical thinking skills and attitudes towards mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(6), 811-816. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390110053784
• Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Dershimer, R. C., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Design based science and real world problem-solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 855-879. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500038165
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th Ed.). New York: Mcgraw-Hill Education.
• Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM integration in middle school life science: Student learning and attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 550-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9612-x
• Güleryüz, H., Dilber, R., & Erdoğan, İ. (2019). Prospective teachers' Views on 3D Printer Use in Stem Applications. Journal of Agri Ibrahim Cecen Universirty Institute of Social Sciences, 5(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.31463/aicusbed.592061
• Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). How science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089-1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0
• Han, S., Rosli, R., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2016). The effect of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) on students’ achievement in four mathematics topics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13, 3-29. doi:10.12973/tused.10168a
• Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking (Second ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
• Judson, E. (2014). Effects of transferring to STEM-focused charter and magnet schools on student achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 107(4), 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.823367
• Karışan, D. & Yurdakul, Y. (2017). The effects of microprocessors based science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) investigations on 6th grade students’ attitudes towards these subject areas. Adnan Menderes University Education Faculty Journal of Education Science, 8(1), 37-52.
• Keçeci, G., Alan, B., & Kırbağ Zengin, F. (2017). STEM education practices with 5th grade students. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Educational Faculty (KEFAD), 18, 1-17.
• Korkmaz, Ö., Çakır, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2015). Computational Thinking Levels Scale (CTLS) Adaptation for Secondary School Level. Gazi Journal of Educational Science, 1(2), 67-86.
• Kurt, M., & Benzer, S. (2020). An investigation on the effect of STEM practices on sixth grade students' academic achievement, problem solving skills, and attitudes towards STEM. Journal of Science Learning, 3(2), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i2.21419
• Lau, S., & Li, W. L. (1996). Peer status and perceived creativity: Are popular children viewed by peers and teachers as creative. Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 347-352. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0904_6
• Macun, Y. (2019). Effect of problem-based STEM activities on 7th grade students' mathematics achievements, attitudes, and views on teaching ratio-proportion and percentage(Publication No. 556387) [Master's thesis, Erciyes University].
• Matud, M. P., Rodríguez, C., & Grande, J. (2007). Gender differences in creative thinking. Personality and individual differences, 43(5), 1137-1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.006
• McClain, M. L. (2015). The effect of STEM education on mathematics achievement of fourth-grade underrepresented minority students (Publication No.372328) [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
• Morrison, J. (2006). Attributes of STEM education: The student, the school, the classroom. Baltimore, MD: The Teaching Institute For Excellence in STEM.
• Olivarez, N. (2012). The impact of a STEM program on academic achievement of eighth grade students in a south Texas middle school (Publication No. 3549798) [Doctoral Dissertation, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christ]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
• Ozben, Ş. & Argun, Y. (2005). Comparison of Creativity Dimension Scores of Buca Education Faculty Students. Journal of Dokuz Eylul University Buca Faculty of Education,18, 16-23.
• Ozcan, H., & Koca, E. (2019). The impact of teaching the subject “pressure” with STEM approach on the academic achievements of the secondary school 7th grade students and their attitudes towards STEM. Education and Science, 44(198), 201-227. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.7902
• Ozyurt, M., Kayiran, B. K., & Başaran, M. (2018). Analysis of Primary School Students’ Attitudes Towards Stem in Terms of Various Variables. Turkish Studies, 13(4), 65-82.
• Patel, N. (2010, September 25). Gagan Goyal: Roboteacher. India Today. https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/20101004-gagan-goyal-roboteacher-744200-2010-09-25.
• Phillips, C. R., & Trainor, J. E. (2014). Millennial students and the flipped classroom. Journal of Business and Educational Leadership, 5(1), 102-112.
• Prawvichien, S., Siripun, K., & Yuenyong, C. (2018, January). Developing teaching process for enhancing students’ mathematical problem solving in the 21st century through STEM education. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1923, No. 1, p. 030069). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019560
• Psycharis, S., & Kotzampasaki, E. (2019). The impact of a stem inquiry game learning scenario on computational thinking and computer self-confidence. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(4), em1689. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103071
• Riskowski, J. L., Todd, C. D., Wee, B., Dark, M., & Harbor, J. (2009). Exploring the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary water resources engineering module in an eighth grade science course. International journal of engineering education, 25(1), 181.
• Ruth, J. E., & Birren, J. E. (1985). Creativity in adulthood and old age: Relations to intelligence, sex and mode of testing. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 8(1), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502548500800107
• SRI International. (2010). Evaluation of the Texas high school project: Second comprehensive annual report. Austin, TX: Author.
• Stotts, C. D. (2019). The effect of AdvancED STEM certification on elementary achievement [Doctoral Dissertation, Lincoln Memorial University]. https://digitalcommons.lmunet.edu/edddissertations/20
• Swaid, S. I. (2015). Bringing computational thinking to STEM education. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 3657-3662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.761
• Tolliver, E. R. (2016). The effects of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education on elementary student achievement in urban schools (Publication No. 10251650)[Doctoral dissertation, Grand Canyon University] ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
• Wade-Shepherd, A. (2016). The effect of middle school STEM curriculum on science and math achievement scores (Publication No. 10307073)[ Doctoral dissertation, Union University). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
• Weese, J. L., Feldhausen, R., & Bean, N. H. (2016). The impact of stem experiences on student self-efficacy in computational thinking. Proceedings of the 123rd American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (ASEE 2016). New Orleans, LA, USA. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26179
• White, D. W. (2014). What is STEM education and why is it important? Florida Association of Teacher Educators Journal, 1(14), 1-9.
• Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
• Yıldırım, B., & Selvi, M. (2017). An Experimental Research on Effects of STEM Applications and Mastery Learning. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 13(2), 183-210. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.310143
• Young, V. M., House, A., Wang, H., Singleton, C., & Klopfenstein, K. (2011). Inclusive STEM Schools: Early Promise in Texas and Unanswered Questions. Highly Successful Schools or Programs for K-12 STEM Education: A Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academies. (Vol. 1, p. 2014)