The Impact of Reading Strategy Training and Extensive Reading on L2 Reading Process

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 5, 154 - 185, 01.09.2025

Hatice Özata , Burcu Ünal

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.68.12.5

Abstract

Readers can improve their comprehension, self-efficacy beliefs, and perceptions by choosing and applying specific strategies. Through explicit training in reading strategies, this study aims to explore the impact of an extensive reading (ER)- integrated reading course on reading comprehension, reading self-efficacy (RSE), perceived utility of reading strategies (PURS), and perceived utility of extensive reading (PUER). Seventy-six university students participated in a semester-long course integrating a reading strategy model with ER activities. The students’ reading comprehension, RSE, PURS, and PUER scores, and perceptions of reading strategy use were measured before and after the intervention. Significant improvements were observed across all measures between the pre- and post-test applications. Qualitative analyses of open-ended questions yielded important results regarding the students’ awareness of the reading strategies taught and ER exercises implemented. Specifically, students’ elaborations on what strategies they utilized and how, when, and why they employed these strategies were found to be improved following the training sessions. The findings suggest that integrating explicit strategy instruction with ER practices can enhance both comprehension and metacognitive awareness, while also encouraging autonomous reading behaviors. Pedagogical implications include designing university-level reading courses that combine systematic strategy training with ER to foster active engagement, strengthen vocabulary development, and support lifelong reading practices.

Keywords

L2 reading , strategy training , perceived utility , extensive reading , reading self-efficacy

Ethical Statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Yildiz Technical University (approval number: 2021l08).

References

• Afflerbach, P., & Cho, B. (2009). Identifying and describing constructively responsive comprehension strategies in new and traditional forms of reading. In S.E., Israel & G.G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (69-90). Routledge.
• Afflerbach, P., Hurt, M., & Cho, B.-Y. (2020). Reading comprehension strategy instruction. In D.L. Dinsmore, L.K. Fryer, & M.M. Parkinson (Eds.), Handbook of strategies and strategic processing (pp. 99–118). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429423635-7
• Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364-373. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.5.1
• Anggia, H., & Habók, A. (2025). The efficacy of online extensive reading among university students and the relationship between affective variables and English reading comprehension. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 8373. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92326-9
• Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2012). Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students’ reading performance and strategy transfer. Instructional Science, 40, 1063-1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9202-5
• Ajideh, P., Zohrabi, M., & Pouralvar, K. (2018). The effect of explicit instruction of metacognitive reading strategies on ESP reading comprehension in academic settings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(4), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.4p.77
• Akkakoson, S. (2013). The effects of strategy instruction on Thai university students’ reading comprehension and strategy use. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(3), 562 570. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.3.562-570
• Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 460-472. https://doi.org/10.2307/329495
• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
• Antoniou, F., & Souvignier, E. (2007). Strategy instruction in reading comprehension: an intervention study for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 5(1), 41-57.
• Bandura, E. (1997). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
• Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M.W., & Anderson, M.C. (2009). Memory. Psychology Press.
• Bamford, J., & Day, R. R. (2004). Extensive reading for teaching language. Cambridge University Press.
• Beglar, D., Hunt, A., & Kite, Y. (2012). The effect of pleasure reading on Japanese university EFL learners’ reading rates. Language Learning, 62(3), 665-703. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00651.x
• Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans, Green.
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.
• Briggs, J. & Walter, C. (2013). Read on! Extensive reading and young second language learners’ motivation and attitudes. Oxford University Press.
• Burrows, L. (2012). The effects of extensive reading and reading strategies on reading self-efficacy [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Temple University, Osaka, Japan.
• Chamot A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130.
• Chinpakdee, M., & Gu, P. Y. (2021). The impact of explicit strategy instruction on EFL secondary school learners’ reading. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 296-319.
• Chumworatayee, T. (2017). The effect of reading strategy instruction on Thai EFL adult learners' reading strategy awareness. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 10 (1), 135-148.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge.
• Dabarera, C., Renandya, W. A., & Zhang, L. J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. System, 42, 462-473.
• Day, R., & Bamford, J. (2002). Top ten principles for teaching extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(2), 136-141.
• Divya John & Sandhiya Devi, G. (2023). Reassessing reading strategies in the engineering classroom. Reading Psychology, 44(3), 326-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2147610
• Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., & Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 262–300. 10.3102/0034654308325998
• Fitri, D. R., Sofyan, D., & Jayani, F.G. (2015). The correlation between reading self-efficacy and reading comprehension. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 3(1), 1-12.
• Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Routledge.
• Graham, S., Woore, R., Porter, A., Courtney, L., & Savory, C. (2020). Navigating the challenges of L2 reading: Self-efficacy, self-regulatory reading strategies, and learner profiles. The Modern Language Journal, 104(4), 693-714. 0.1111/modl.12672
• Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Educational International.
• Holligan, A. (2018) Dutch language besieged by English at university. BBC News. 31 October 2018. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46030112
• Karbalaei, A. (2011). Assessing reading strategy training based on CALLA model in EFL and ESL context. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 16(27), 167-187.
• Koda, K. (2012). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. CUP.
• Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Lake, J., & Holster, T. (2014). Developing autonomous self-regulated readers in an extensive reading program. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 5(4), 394-403.
• Li, H., Gan, Z., Leung, S. O., & An, Z. (2022). The impact of reading strategy instruction on reading comprehension, strategy use, motivation, and self-efficacy in Chinese university EFL students. Sage Open, 12(1). 10.1177/21582440221086659
• Li, Y., & Wang, C. (2010). An empirical study of reading self-efficacy and the use of reading strategies in the Chinese EFL context. Asian EFL Journal, 12(2), 144-162.
• Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313-327.
• Macalister, J. (2011). Today’s teaching, tomorrow’s text: Exploring the teaching of reading. ELT Journal, 65, 161–169.
• Magogwe, J. M., & Oliver, R. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35, 338–352.
• Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Motivation, and Reading Comprehension Performance of Saudi EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 117-129. 10.5539/elt.v9n3p117
• McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R. G. K. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 218–253.
• Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Motivation, and Reading Comprehension Performance of Saudi EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 117-129.
• Milkulecy, B.S. and Jeffries, L. (2007). Advanced reading power: Extensive reading, vocabulary building, comprehension skills, reading faster. Pearson Education.
• Mohammed, G. M. S. (2022). The impact of reading strategies and self-efficacy on reading comprehension: The case of Saudi EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(Special Issue 1), 627-639.
• Mokhtari, K., Reichard, C.A. & Sheorey, R. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and use of reading strategies among adolescent readers. In K. Mokhtari & R. Sheorey (Eds.), Reading strategies of first- and second-language learners: See how they read (pp. 99–112). Rowman and Littlefield.
• Nicaise, M., & Gettinger, M. (1995). Fostering reading comprehension in college students. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 16(3), 283-337.
• Okyar, H. (2021). Turkish EFL learners’ reading strategy use and its relation to reading self-efficacy and gender. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 21(1), 116-130.
• Oranpattanachai, P. (2023). Relationship between the Reading Strategy, Reading Self-Efficacy, and Reading Comprehension of Thai EFL Students. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(1), 194-220.
• Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House Publishers.
• Park, J., & Ro, E. (2015). The core principles of extensive reading in an EAP writing context. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(2), 308-313.
• Phillips, D. (2001). Longman preparation course for the TOEFL test. Longman.
• Salataci, R., & Akyel, A. (2002). A study of Turkish EFL students’ use of learning strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 35(6), 685-692.
• Schöber, C., Schütte, K., Köller, O., McElvany, N. & Gebauer, M. M. Reciprocal effects between self-efficacy and achievement in mathematics and reading. Learn. Individ. Differ. 63, 1-11 (2018). 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.01.008
• Schunk, D. H. & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement:Theoretical perspectives. Psychology Press.
• Seymour, P., & Walsh, M. (2006). Reading for academic purposes: Guidelines for the ESL classroom. TESL-EJ, 10(3), 1-17.
• Shehzad, M. W., Lashari, T. A., Lashari, S. A., & Hasan, M. K. (2020). The interplay of self-efficacy sources and reading self-efficacy beliefs in metacognitive reading strategies. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 523-544.
• Shih, Y. C., Chern, C. L., & Reynold, B. L. (2018). Bringing extensive reading and reading strategies into the Taiwanese junior college classroom. Reading in a Foreign Language, 30(1), 130-151.
• Shorten, A. & Smith, J. (2017). Mixed methods research: Expanding the evidence base. Evid Based Nurse, 20(3). 74-75. 10.1136/eb-2017-102699.
• Solheim, O. J. (2011). The impact of reading self-efficacy and task value on reading comprehension scores in different item formats. Reading Psychology, 32(1), 1-27.
• Spears, D. (2013). Improving reading skills: Contemporary readings for college students. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
• Tavakoli, H., & Koosha M. (2016). The effect of explicit metacognitive strategy instruction on reading comprehension and self-efficacy beliefs: The case of Iranian university EFL students. Porta Linguarum, 25, 119–133.
• Tavşancıl, E. (2006). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Measurement of Attitudes and Data Analysis with SPSS]. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım [Nobel Publishing].
• Tobing, I. R. A. (2013). The relationship of reading strategies and self-efficacy with the reading comprehension of high school students in Indonesia [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation]. University of Kansas.
• Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (2014). Reading in a second language: Process, product, and practice. Routledge.
• Yang, G., Badri, M., Al Rashedi, A., & Almazroui, K. (2018). The role of reading motivation, self-efficacy, and home influence in students’ literacy achievement: A preliminary examination of fourth graders in Abu Dhabi. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 6, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-018-0063-0
• Yang, K., & Gan, Z. (2024). A systematic review of reading self-efficacy in second or foreign language learning. System, 125, 103436. 10.1016/j.system.2021.103436
• Zhang, L. J. (2008). Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: Exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classroom. Instructional Science, 36, 89-116.
• Zhang, P. (2024). Effects of highlights and annotations on EFL learners’ Reading comprehension: an application of computer-assisted interactive reading model. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2410166