The Refugee in Law and Practice: In the Face of Western States’ Pushback Policies

Öz

The present Article revisits the refugee definition and the non-refoulement principle in the context of some western states’ pushback policies under international law. Recent incidents have shown that some western states have pushed back refugees by employing a nativist approach for political ends. In addition, mentioned western states in many situations have made references to produced false narratives about refugees to justify their illicit actions. By bringing the refugee definition of international law to light, this Article aims to set forth the illegality of these states’ goal of manipulating the existing legal definitions. To this end, the Article first explains what a refugee is in international law, freeing it from the above-mentioned false narratives. Second, the analysis establishes the illegality of refugees’ pushback under international law, which contradicts the non-refoulement principle. Furthermore, potential solutions to suppress the states’ illegal actions within the scope of pushbacks will be discussed separately by this Article. Finally, to conclude, the Article points that states find ways to create legal loopholes by ignoring the recognized rights of refugees. But it also underlines that being determined to find solutions that will deactivate pushback policies is essential to ensure that every alien has the right to seek asylum.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Refugee
• non-refoulement
• international law
• pushback policies
• western states

Batılı Devletlerin Geri İtme Politikaları Karşısında Hukuk ve Uygulamada Mülteci

Öz

Bu makale, bazı batılı devletlerin geri itme politikaları bağlamında uluslararası hukuk kapsamında mülteci tanımını ve geri göndermeme ilkesini yeniden gözden geçirmektedir. Son olaylar, bazı batılı devletlerin siyasi amaçlar için ulusun yerli halkının hak ve çıkarlarını gözeten bir yaklaşım kullanarak mültecileri geri ittiğini göstermiştir. Birçok durumda adı geçen batılı devletler, yasadışı eylemlerini haklı çıkarmak için mülteciler hakkında yanlış anlatılara atıfta bulunmuşlardır. Bu makale, uluslararası hukukun mülteci tanımını gün ışığına çıkararak, bu devletlerin mevcut yasal tanımları manipüle etme hedefinin hukuka aykırılığını ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu yönde, ilk olarak, makale uluslararası hukukta mültecinin ne olduğunu, yukarıda belirtilen yanlış anlatılardan bağımsızlaştırarak açıklamaktadır. Devam eden analiz, ikinci olarak, mültecilerin uluslararası hukuka göre geri itilmesinin yasadışı olduğunu ve bu durumun geri göndermeme ilkesiyle çeliştiğini tespit etmektedir. Devletlerin geri itme kapsamında hukuka aykırı eylemlerinin bastırılmasına yönelik olası çözümler makale kapsamında ayrıca ele alınacaktır. Nihayetinde, makale sonuç olarak, devletlerin mültecilerin haklarını görmezden gelerek, yasal boşluklar yaratma yollarını bulabileceğine işaret eder. Ancak, makale -her yabancının sığınma hakkı olduğundan emin olunması için- devletlerin geri itme politikalarını devre dışı bırakacak çözümlerde ısrar edilmesinin önemli olduğu hususunun da altını çizmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mülteci
• uluslararası hukuk
• geri itme politikaları
• batılı devletler

Kaynakça

1. Asian-African Legal Consultative Organization (AALCO), ‘Bangkok Principles on the Status and Treatment of Refugees (Bangkok Principles)’, (UNHCR, 31 December 1966) accessed 8 April 2021 google scholar
2. Cartagena Declaration on Refugees and the Protection of People Fleeing Armed Conflict and Other Situations of Violence in Latin America (22 November 1984) OAS Doc OEA/Ser L/V/II 66/doc 10 google scholar
3. Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (adopted 28 July 1951, entered into force 22 April 1954) 189 UNTS 137 (Refugee Convention) google scholar
4. Council of the European Union, Council Directive Supplementing the Provisions of Article 26 of the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 [2001] 2001/51/EC google scholar
5. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (adopted 10 December 1984, entered into force 26 June 1987) 1465 UNTS 85 (CAT) google scholar
6. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights, as amended) (ECHR), amended by Protocols nos 11 and 14, 4 November 1950, ETS 5 google scholar
7. European Union Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on Common Procedures for Granting and Withdrawing International Protection (Recast) [2013] OJ L 180 60-94. google scholar
8. European Commission, ‘Migration and Asylum Package: New Pact on Migration and Asylum Documents Adopted on 23 September 2020’ (23 September 2020) accessed 26 August 2021 google scholar

9. Global Compact on Refugees, UN doc A/73/12 (Part II) (2 August 2018) google scholar
10. Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, UN doc A/RES/73/195 (19 December 2018) google scholar
11. Human Rights Council Report of the Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman Degrading Treatment or Punishment A/HRC/37/50 google scholar
12. International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (adopted 21 December 1965, entered into force on 4 January 1969) 660 UNTS 195 google scholar
13. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976) 999 UNTS 171 (ICCPR) google scholar
14. Organization of African Unity Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (1001 UNTS 45) done 10 September 1969, entered into force 20 June 1974 google scholar
15. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, CCPR General Comment No. 15: The Position of Aliens Under the Covenant (Twenty-seventh session of the Human Rights Committee, 11 April 1986) accessed 7 April 2021 google scholar
16. Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (adopted 31 January 1967, entered into force 4 October 1967) 606 UNTS 267 (The 1967 Protocol) google scholar
17. Protocol 4 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, securing certain Rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the First Protocol thereto, 16 September 1963, ETS 46 google scholar
18. UNHCR, ‘Provision on International Protection Including Through Complementary Forms of Protection’ Executive Committee of The UNHCR Programme Conclusions on International Protection (2005) 56th Session 274 < https://www.refworld.org/ type,EXCONC,UNHCR,,5a2ead6b4,0.html> accessed on 24 May 2021 google scholar
19. UNHCR, ‘Glossary’ (UNHCR, 30 June 2006) accessed 24 February 2021 google scholar
20. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (adopted 10 December) 1948 UNGA Res 217 A(III) (UDHR) google scholar
21. UNHCR, ‘Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status and Guidelines on International Protection Under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol Relating to The Status of Refugees’ (The UNHCR Handbook, 2019), 21 accessed 25 May 2021 google scholar
22. United Nations General Assembly Human Rights Council, ‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions on the Right to Life and the Use of Force by Private Security Providers in Law Enforcement Contexts’ (2016) A/HRC/32/39 accessed 28 May 2021 google scholar
23. United Nations General Assembly, ‘Unlawful death of refugees and migrants Note by the Secretary-General’, Seventy-second session, Item 73 (b) of the provisional agenda, A/72/335, (15 August 2017) accessed 5 January 2021 google scholar
24. UNHCR Executive Committee Conclusion No 25 XXXIII (1982) para (b) google scholar
25. ——, ‘Guidance On Racism and Xenophobia How UNHCR Can Address and Respond to Situations of Racism and Xenophobia Affecting Persons under Its Mandate’ (2020) accessed 21 August 2021 google scholar
26. ——, ‘Figures at a Glance’ (18 June 2021) accessed 19 August 2021 google scholar
27. Amuur v France 19776/92 (European Court of Human Rights, 1996) google scholar
28. Asady and others v Slovakia App no 24917/15 (ECHR, 24 March 2020) google scholar
29. Court of Justice of the European Union, ‘EU Law Precludes a National Supreme Court, Following an Appeal in the Interests of the Law Brought by the Prosecutor General, from Declaring a Request for a Preliminary Ruling Submitted by a Lower Court Unlawful on the Ground That the Questions Referred Are Not Relevant and Necessary for the Resolution of the Dispute in the Main Proceedings’ (Court of Justice of the European Union, 23 November 2021) Press Release No: 207/21 accessed 26 November 2021 google scholar
30. C-808/18 European Commission v Hungary [2020] EU: C:1029 google scholar
31. Chahal v The United Kingdom App no 22414/93 (ECHR, 15 November 1996) google scholar
32. Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy App no. 27765/09 (ECHR, 23 February 2012) google scholar
33. John Doe et al v Canada, Report N. 78/11 - Case 12.586 (Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, 21 July 2011) accessed 6 April 2021 google scholar
34. Khlaifia and Others v. Italy App no 16483/12 (ECHR, 15 December 2016) google scholar
35. Plaintiff M70/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship; and Plaintiff M106 of 2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] Australia: High Court 2011] HCA 32, 2011] HCA 32 google scholar
36. Prosecutor v Katanga et al [2013] International Criminal Court (ICC) ICC-01/04 - 01/07 google scholar
37. M K and Others v Poland Applications no 40503/17, 42902/17 and 43643/17 (ECHR, 23 July 2020) google scholar
38. M A and Others v Lithuania Application no 59793/17 (ECHR, 11 December 2018) google scholar
39. Namah v Pato [2016] Papua New Guinea [In the Supreme Court of Justice] SCA No 84 of 2015 SC1497 google scholar
40. N D & N T v Spanish App no 8675/15 and 8697/15 (ECHR, 13 February 2020) google scholar
41. 11 A 1564/20A (Oberverwaltungsgericht NRW, 21 January 2021) accessed 25 November 2021. google scholar
42. Australia Federal Register of Legislation, ‘Migration Act 1958’ (1958) accessed 24 November 2021. google scholar
43. Allport G W, The Nature of Prejudice (25th Anniversary Edition, Addison -Wesley Publishing Company 1954) google scholar
44. Arendt H, The origins of totalitarianism (Harcourt Publishing, 1976) google scholar
45. Balibar E, We, The People of Europe? Reflections on Transnational Citizenship (Princeton University Press 2004) google scholar
46. Benhabib S, The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens (1st edn, Cambridge University Press 2004) google scholar
47. Betts A and Collier P, Refugee: Rethinking Refugee Policy in a Changing World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017) google scholar
48. Carastathis A and Tsilimpounidi M, Challenging Migration Studies - Reproducing Refugees_ Photographia of A Crisis (Rowman Littlefield 2020) google scholar
49. Chomsky A, Undocumented How Immigration Became Illegal (MA: Beacon Press 2014) google scholar
50. Davies S E, Legitimising Rejection International Refugee Law in Southeast Asia (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2008) google scholar
51. Dummett M, On Migration and Refugees (Routledge 2001) google scholar
52. Fiske L, Human Rights, Refugee Protest and Immigration Detention (Palgrave Macmillan 2016) google scholar
53. Feller E, Türk V and Nicholson F (edn), Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR’s Global Consultations on International Protection (Cambridge University Press 2003) google scholar
54. Foster M, International Refugee Law and Socio-Economic Rights Refuge from Deprivation (Cambridge University Press 2007) google scholar
55. Gammeltoft T, Access to Asylum International Refugee Law and the Globalisation of Migration Control (Cambridge University Press 2013) google scholar
56. Goodwin-Gill G S, The Refugee in International Law (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2007) google scholar
57. Goodwin-Gill G S, ‘Forced Migration: Refugees, Rights and Security’ in McAdam J (eds), Forced google scholar
58. Migration, Human Rights and Security (Hart Publishing 2008) google scholar
59. Gordenker L, Refugees in International Politics (Beckenham: Croom Helm 1987) google scholar
60. Haddad E, ‘Who Is (Not) a Refugee?’ The Refugee in International Society: Between Sovereigns (Cambridge University Press 2008) google scholar
61. Hart H L A, The Concept of Law (Penelope A. Bulloch and Joseph Raz eds, Clarendon Press 1994) google scholar
62. International Organisation for Migration, Glossary on Migration, International Migration Law Series No. 25 (2nd edn, IOM 2011) google scholar
63. Lauterpacht H, The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Stevens & Sons, Ltd.; New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1958) google scholar
64. Lauterpacht S E and Bethlehem D, ‘The Scope and Content of the Principle of Non- Refoulement’ in UNHCR (eds) Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR’s Global Consultations on International Protection (Cambridge University Press 2003) google scholar
65. Martin D, ‘The New Asylum Seekers’ in Martin (ed) D A, The New Asylum Seekers: Refugee Law in the 1980s The Ninth Sokol Colloquium on International Law International Studies in Human Rights (Springer Science Business Media, B V 2014) google scholar
66. Schabas W A, The Customary International Law of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2021). google scholar
67. Tom K, Towards A Definition of Refugees (Oxford: Refugee Studies Centre, 1991) google scholar
68. Türk V and Down R, ‘Protection Gaps’ in Qasmiyeh E F, Loescher G and Long K et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies (Oxford Handbooks Online, 2014) google scholar
69. Wilson E (tr), The Odyssey (WW Norton and Company Ltd 2018) google scholar Yakushko O, Modern-Day Xenophobia Critical Historical and Theoretical Perspectives on the Roots of Anti-Immigrant Prejudice (Palgrave Macmillan 2018) google scholar
70. Achiume T, ‘Beyond Prejudice: Structural Xenophobic Discrimination against Refugees’ (2014) 45 Georgetown Journal of International Law google scholar
71. Aksel D B and İçduygu A, ‘Borders and the Mobility of Migrants in Turkey’ (CEASEVAL Research on The Common European Asylum System, 2019) accessed 25 October 2021 google scholar
72. Allain J, ‘The Jus Cogens Nature of Non-Refoulement’ (2001) 13 International Journal of Refugee Law 533 google scholar
73. Cohen A, ‘The Aims of The International Refugee Organization as Regards Legal and Political Protection’ (Speech at IRO and Voluntary Organizations Conference, Geneva 18-21 January 1949), Wiener Library, London, Its Digital Archive, 6.1.1/82509659#1, accessed 6 April 2021 google scholar
74. Dowd R, ‘Dissecting Discrimination in Refugee Law: An Analysis of Its Meaning and Its Cumulative Effect’ (2011) 23 Int’l J Refugee L google scholar
75. Da-Boi R K, ‘Origins, political, economic, and discursive contexts of Europe’s “refugee crisis,” and the 2020 Moria camp disaster’ (2021) 282 Academia Letters google scholar
76. Dauvergne C, ‘Sovereignty, Migration and the Rule of Law in Global Times’ (2004) 67 The Mod L Rev. google scholar
77. Fabry A, ‘Neoliberalism, Crisis and Authoritarian-Ethnicist Reaction: The Ascendancy of the Orban Regime’ (2019) 23 Sage Journals accessed 23 November 2021 google scholar
78. Gammeltoft-Hansen T and Hathaway J C, ‘Non-Refoulement in a World of Cooperative Deterrence’ (2015) 53 Colum J Transnat’l L google scholar
79. Garip F, Shannon Gleeson and Mathew Hall, How the State Criminalizes Immigrants and to What Effect: A Multi-Disciplinary Account (Cornell University 2019) google scholar
80. Ghezelbash D, ‘Hyper-legalism and Obfuscation: How States Evade Their International Obligations Towards Refugees’ [2020] American Journal of Comparative Law google scholar
81. Goodwin-Gill G S, ‘The Right to Seek Asylum: Interception at Sea and the Principle of Non-Refoulement’ (2011) 23 Int’l J Refugee L google scholar
82. Goodwin-Gill G S, ‘The Dynamic of International Refugee Law’ (2013) 25 Int’l J Refugee google scholar
83. Gibney M J and Hansen R, ‘Asylum Policy in the West: Past Trends, Future Possibilities’ (UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research, 2003) accessed 23 August 2021 google scholar
84. Hathaway J C, ‘Leveraging Asylum’ (2010) 3-45 Tex. Int’l L J google scholar
85. Hathaway J C and Storey H, ‘What Is the Meaning of State Protection in Refugee Law - A Debate’ (2016) 28 Int’l J Refugee L google scholar
86. Hudson B, ‘Migration in the Mediterranean: Exposing the Limits of Vulnerability at the European Court of Human Rights’ (2018) 4 Maritime Safety and Security Law Journal google scholar
87. Harris J, ‘Xenia: Refugees, Displaced Persons and Reciprocity’ (2020) 29 Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics google scholar
88. Kritzman-Amir T and Spijkerboer T, ‘On the Morality and Legality of Borders: Border Policies and Asylum Seekers’ (2013) 26-1 Harvard Human Rights Journal google scholar
89. Mann I, ‘Maritime Legal Black Holes: Migration and Rightlessness in International Law’ (2018) 29 The European Journal of International Law google scholar
90. Mercier A, ‘İnsan Haklarının Temelleri’, in Kucuradi I (eds), İnsan Haklarının Felsefi Temelleri (4th edn, Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu 2009) google scholar
91. McNeil W H, ‘What We Mean by the West’ [1997] Western Civ in World Politics google scholar
92. Newth G, ‘Rethinking “Nativism”: Beyond the Ideational Approach’ [2021] Taylor & Francis Identities Global Studies in Culture and Power accessed 25 December 2021. google scholar
93. Oberoi P, ‘Words Matter. But Rights Matter More’ (2018) 11 Anti-Trafficking Review google scholar
94. Posner E A, ‘Do States Have a Moral Obligation to Obey International Law’ 56 Stan L Rev 1 google scholar
95. Rich S M, ‘Against Prejudice’ (2011) 80-1 Geo Wash L Rev google scholar
96. Riedel R, ‘Nativism versus nationalism and populism - bridging the gap’ (2018) 2 Central European Papers 18 google scholar
97. Storey H, ‘Armed Conflict in Asylum Law: The “War-Flaw”’ (2012) 31 Refugee Survey Quarter google scholar
98. Storey H and Wallace R, ‘War and Peace in Refugee Law Jurisprudence’ (2001) 95 The American Journal of International Law google scholar
99. Spinelli F, ‘United against the Pact: The Fatal Flaws in the EU’s Plans to Reform its Asylum System’ (Green European Journal, 17 March 2021) accessed 7 April 2021 google scholar
100. Türk V, ‘The Promise and Potential of the Global Compact on Refugees’ (2018) 30 International Journal of Refugee Law google scholar
101. Webber F, ‘Europe’s unknown war Race and Class’ (2017) 59 Sage Journals 1 google scholar
102. Wood T and McAdam J, ‘Australian Asylum Policy All at Sea: An Analysis Of “Plaintiff M70/2011 V Minister for Immigration and Citizenship” And the Australia-Malaysia Arrangement’ 61 The International and Comparative Law Quarterly google scholar
103. Zavala A G, Guerra R, and Simâo C, ‘The Relationship between the Brexit Vote and Individual Predictors of Prejudice: Collective Narcissism, Right Wing Authoritarianism, Social Dominance Orientation’ [2017] Frontiers in Psychology accessed 21 August 2021 google scholar
104. Zheng Y, Goh E, and Wen J, ‘The Effects of Misleading Media Reports About COVID-19 on Chinese Tourists’ Mental Health: A Perspective Article’ (2020) 31 Anatolia Taylor & Francis Online accessed 24 November 2021 google scholar
105. Zimmermann S E, ‘Reconsidering the Problem of “Bogus” Refugees with “Socio-Economic Motivations” for Seeking Asylum’ (2011) 6 Mobilities accessed 23 August 2011 google scholar
106. Cambridge Dictionary, ‘Western Adjective (Also Western)’ accessed 20 August 2021. google scholar
107. Court of Justice of the European Union Press Release, ‘Hungary Has Failed to Fulfil Its Obligations under EU Law in the Area of Procedures for Granting International Protection and Returning Illegally Staying Third-Country Nationals’ (2020) Press Release 161/20 accessed 25 May 2021 google scholar
108. Günaydın E, ‘Avusturya Başbakanı Kurz: Benim Dönemimde Afgan Mülteci Almayacağız’ Euronews (22 August 2021) accessed 23 August 2021 google scholar
109. International Review of the Red Cross, ‘Note on Migration and the Principle of Non-Refoulement’ (2018) accessed 22 April 2021 google scholar
110. IOM UN Migration, ‘Alarming Loss of Life on Way to Canaries Worsens in 2021’ (24 September 2021) accessed 25 November 2021 google scholar
111. Lexico Dictionary, ‘Western World Pronunciation /ıwest(a)n 'wa:ld/’ accessed 20 August 2021. google scholar
112. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, ‘Xenophobia’ accessed 20 August 2021 google scholar
113. The Hon Karen Andrews MP, ‘Joint Media Release with the Hon. Westly Nukundj MP - Finalization of the Regional Resettlement Arrangement’ (Australian Government, 6 October 2021) accessed 26 November 2021 google scholar